Re: SW 327 Nightguard
Let's say this for about the seven millionth time in a gun forum: recoil is a subjectively experienced phenomenon.
Some guys don't need can openers, and, like Popeye, just squish them open when they needs their spinach. Others, puny humans, have to use can openers. The former are the few who say (and perceive) that there's little or no recoil problem with revolvers that sport stainless steel cylinders spinning inside frames made of Unobtanium or whatever in the hell it is that S&W is marketing this year. The latter are the vast majority of gun-toting humanity who come in three basic varieties: they either lie through their teeth because they don't want to look short-dicked before their buddies, they enjoy intense, painful recoil (and presumably basements that look like LA pawn-shop basements), or they stubbornly cling to what was a poorly thought-out investment.
It's in this third group of the latter that we find many new to newish firearms owners. Some hadn't yet understood the essential relationship between recoil and mass and didn't want to have to walk around with, let alone pick up in their hands a heavy pistol. Others commit the same hopeful error at least a few times, hoping to find a grail piece that delivers maximum downrange energy at a minimum weight. Unfortunately, unless you can just about shuck oysters with your fingertips, you accept pain, a brick in your belt, or a comparatively ineffectual caliber.