D
Deleted member 121493
Guest
Have previously had ATX 65mm but sold it wanting a bigger objective lens. Now I am thinking about the BTX. I have a really good deal on a new pair 3500 for BTX + 95mm +1.7mag.
Alternatively I am considering a ATX or STX 95mm. I have read the BTX gives less eye strain which is important. The image is not really stereoscopic however (only one objective) so I am curious if the viewing experience resembles binocular vision as some seem to suggest. I was hoping for a similar experience I got using 15x56 slc where I felt like they were 30x.
With my 65mm ATX i was struggling to see bullet holes past 500 yards. Not sure if a 95mm objective will give me more clarity at max magnification? How well does the 1.7 extender (up to 120x) work in favorable conditions? And what kind of resulution I can expect from the BTX With extender at 60x magnification?
Now that the BTX has been out a couple years and the initial hype has calmed, what do you guys think?
Alternatively I am considering a ATX or STX 95mm. I have read the BTX gives less eye strain which is important. The image is not really stereoscopic however (only one objective) so I am curious if the viewing experience resembles binocular vision as some seem to suggest. I was hoping for a similar experience I got using 15x56 slc where I felt like they were 30x.
With my 65mm ATX i was struggling to see bullet holes past 500 yards. Not sure if a 95mm objective will give me more clarity at max magnification? How well does the 1.7 extender (up to 120x) work in favorable conditions? And what kind of resulution I can expect from the BTX With extender at 60x magnification?
Now that the BTX has been out a couple years and the initial hype has calmed, what do you guys think?
Last edited by a moderator: