Evaluating the 5-20x50mm SS Super Sniper
First let me add a little background. I am not a professional optic evaluator, just another shooter that until the last four years was living fine with one to five hundred dollar glass for the purpose of hunting and short range target shooting. That all changed when I was invited to participate in a local SWAT match where area teams compete against each other for bragging rights. I was to be filling the role of spotter to assist a fellow coworker and department marksman. That lead me to this site in my quest to learn everything I could to further my knowledge and help us win... Those were the days I actully had money and thought I was a good shot
Now I know better!
Rain Date.
I’ve had the Super Sniper now for 7 days and was finely able to use it for what it was designed for, long range target engagement. To this point I had put just enough rounds under it for a zero and a quick load test and a little time out in the back forty to see how it stacked up against what I usually carry. That being a Nikon, Leupold, Burris, Vortex, Swarovski and/or Nightforce. The SS appeared to be well made, well thought out and showed characteristics of good optical quality.
Now for the meat. It was a nice warm day today at the 1000 yard range and there was significant mirage present. Along with me was the 5-20x50mm SS, 3.5-15x50mm NF NXS mrad/mlr, Leupold (pre MK4) 3.5-10x40mm M3 and a Nikon Tactical (pre X)2.5-10x44mm with the Gen2 copy reticle. I started shooting with the SS at 400 yards and dialed in every hundred yards out to 1000. I experienced no problems there so I started dialing in drops predicted by JBM or my FDAC slide rule for different distances between 300 and 1000 but not in order this time. I used up to 11.8 mils and I am happy to say it track properly with in that range and right on the numbered indicators. I mention numbered indicators because when I first zeroed in the pouring rain and reset the elevation knob it would not line up perfectly with where the 0 is indicated on the dial. It would line up either tenth of a mil low or half way between 0 and a tenth of a mil above the indicated 0. When I went out the next day to shoot some dots I found needed to adjust my zero by a tenth and reset the knob zero at which point everything lined up like it should.
So everything lined up and tracked appropriately so now I compared the SS to the other optics I had with me. First the Nikon. I have always stated that the field of view is narrow in these but they are dependable and have glass good enough to get the job done. The SS doesn’t suffer from the same narrow field of view and was substantially better in clarity as I looked around the edges of the field. I then moved on to the Leupold. I really like this particular scopes' optics, it has one of the widest fields as any I have used yet and resolves detail better than last three Leupold MK4’s I have owned. The SS was turned down to 10 power and compared. The field of the Leupold surpassed that of the SS. Now this is a guess, as I have no hard numbers, but roughly 10 feet more was visible when observing the range around the 600 yard mark. Optical quality was too close to clearly tell between them. Understand, like I said above, this isn’t your average Leupold. I then moved on to the Nightforce. This is my bread and butter scope. I have spent hours behind it and hold it in high regard. It has yet to let me down and has done everything I have asked, both on the range and in the wilds of Montana on more than one backpacking mule deer hunt. Yes, it is heavy and bulky but it is dependable and not jarred when I slip and fall, banged against trees and rocks or crammed into my pack. I am happy to report that I could tell no difference between them when resolving weeds and branches down on the 1000 yard berm and nearby tree line. Due to the mirage I also looked at objects closer and I feel confident that they are evenly matched when on the same magnification. Again the field is not as wide as the NF, but here is one area I found where the SS may have an advantage. At the very edges of the field in this NF I commonly get ghost images or stray light reflection. Let me describe that a little better… On a 20” white painted steel target if you hold the scope so half of the target is out of view and the other half is just inside the field it shines. Now when I compare the NF with in the field that the SS has the image is clear. So is it better or worse than the NF, that will totally depend on the shooters point of view.
Views brought to you by my SS and NF
20x
10x
5x
NF @ 10x I think...
Turrets:
When I ordered this scope, and the other one I have not yet received, this was an area of concern. I love the resistance and solid click of my Nikon and Nightforce and was hoping the SS would be just as good and sure. I under stood that with 10 mils per turn the adjustments would be closer together leading me to believe that this may compound the possibility of a problem. My concerns were unfounded; rest assured there is no problem with the turret adjustment feel, engagement or resistance.
Wrapping it up:
I did not find and curvature of field, nor chromatic aberration/color fringing present in this scope to my still learning eye. The dependability and durability testing will continue but I can say right now <span style="font-weight: bold">SWFA has hit a home run with this scope.</span> I can say the next time I am in the market for a 1500-1800 dollar scope, barring any issues that challenge the dependability and durability, (which for now I don’t think there will be any) I would buy the SS every time just for the added features over a NF.
Improvements:
I too find the power adjustment difficult to turn because of nothing present to get a grip on. I suppose a cat tail will fix this but it truly will be necessary, that is, unless you like getting out of position to get a better grasp on the adjustment ring.
If and when it happens again, the turret not being able to zero at all tenths will bother me. It will be interesting to see if the second one I ordered exhibits this.
One last concern I had and to some degree still have... Is 5 power going to be low enough for me and my needs. YMMV but I have had 6.5-20 scopes in the past and 6.5 power has proven to be too powerful during certain activities I use my scopes for, namely hunting in brush or thick wooded areas. In my trip out in the field this was one of the things I was testing. I don’t think this is going to be as big of an issue with a low end of 5 power but it is still on my mind.
I would love to see SWFA come out with a scope with a low power around 3 but still powerful enough to be useful at 1000. I use 10 power scopes quite frequently at 1000 and while it’s useable, 12 power or higher would be great.
While I am offering suggestions, a 40mm-44mm objective would be preferred as well. Keep the PA knob, center dot illumination, turrets and FFP the same.
First let me add a little background. I am not a professional optic evaluator, just another shooter that until the last four years was living fine with one to five hundred dollar glass for the purpose of hunting and short range target shooting. That all changed when I was invited to participate in a local SWAT match where area teams compete against each other for bragging rights. I was to be filling the role of spotter to assist a fellow coworker and department marksman. That lead me to this site in my quest to learn everything I could to further my knowledge and help us win... Those were the days I actully had money and thought I was a good shot
Rain Date.
I’ve had the Super Sniper now for 7 days and was finely able to use it for what it was designed for, long range target engagement. To this point I had put just enough rounds under it for a zero and a quick load test and a little time out in the back forty to see how it stacked up against what I usually carry. That being a Nikon, Leupold, Burris, Vortex, Swarovski and/or Nightforce. The SS appeared to be well made, well thought out and showed characteristics of good optical quality.
Now for the meat. It was a nice warm day today at the 1000 yard range and there was significant mirage present. Along with me was the 5-20x50mm SS, 3.5-15x50mm NF NXS mrad/mlr, Leupold (pre MK4) 3.5-10x40mm M3 and a Nikon Tactical (pre X)2.5-10x44mm with the Gen2 copy reticle. I started shooting with the SS at 400 yards and dialed in every hundred yards out to 1000. I experienced no problems there so I started dialing in drops predicted by JBM or my FDAC slide rule for different distances between 300 and 1000 but not in order this time. I used up to 11.8 mils and I am happy to say it track properly with in that range and right on the numbered indicators. I mention numbered indicators because when I first zeroed in the pouring rain and reset the elevation knob it would not line up perfectly with where the 0 is indicated on the dial. It would line up either tenth of a mil low or half way between 0 and a tenth of a mil above the indicated 0. When I went out the next day to shoot some dots I found needed to adjust my zero by a tenth and reset the knob zero at which point everything lined up like it should.
So everything lined up and tracked appropriately so now I compared the SS to the other optics I had with me. First the Nikon. I have always stated that the field of view is narrow in these but they are dependable and have glass good enough to get the job done. The SS doesn’t suffer from the same narrow field of view and was substantially better in clarity as I looked around the edges of the field. I then moved on to the Leupold. I really like this particular scopes' optics, it has one of the widest fields as any I have used yet and resolves detail better than last three Leupold MK4’s I have owned. The SS was turned down to 10 power and compared. The field of the Leupold surpassed that of the SS. Now this is a guess, as I have no hard numbers, but roughly 10 feet more was visible when observing the range around the 600 yard mark. Optical quality was too close to clearly tell between them. Understand, like I said above, this isn’t your average Leupold. I then moved on to the Nightforce. This is my bread and butter scope. I have spent hours behind it and hold it in high regard. It has yet to let me down and has done everything I have asked, both on the range and in the wilds of Montana on more than one backpacking mule deer hunt. Yes, it is heavy and bulky but it is dependable and not jarred when I slip and fall, banged against trees and rocks or crammed into my pack. I am happy to report that I could tell no difference between them when resolving weeds and branches down on the 1000 yard berm and nearby tree line. Due to the mirage I also looked at objects closer and I feel confident that they are evenly matched when on the same magnification. Again the field is not as wide as the NF, but here is one area I found where the SS may have an advantage. At the very edges of the field in this NF I commonly get ghost images or stray light reflection. Let me describe that a little better… On a 20” white painted steel target if you hold the scope so half of the target is out of view and the other half is just inside the field it shines. Now when I compare the NF with in the field that the SS has the image is clear. So is it better or worse than the NF, that will totally depend on the shooters point of view.
Views brought to you by my SS and NF
20x
10x
5x
NF @ 10x I think...
Turrets:
When I ordered this scope, and the other one I have not yet received, this was an area of concern. I love the resistance and solid click of my Nikon and Nightforce and was hoping the SS would be just as good and sure. I under stood that with 10 mils per turn the adjustments would be closer together leading me to believe that this may compound the possibility of a problem. My concerns were unfounded; rest assured there is no problem with the turret adjustment feel, engagement or resistance.
Wrapping it up:
I did not find and curvature of field, nor chromatic aberration/color fringing present in this scope to my still learning eye. The dependability and durability testing will continue but I can say right now <span style="font-weight: bold">SWFA has hit a home run with this scope.</span> I can say the next time I am in the market for a 1500-1800 dollar scope, barring any issues that challenge the dependability and durability, (which for now I don’t think there will be any) I would buy the SS every time just for the added features over a NF.
Improvements:
I too find the power adjustment difficult to turn because of nothing present to get a grip on. I suppose a cat tail will fix this but it truly will be necessary, that is, unless you like getting out of position to get a better grasp on the adjustment ring.
If and when it happens again, the turret not being able to zero at all tenths will bother me. It will be interesting to see if the second one I ordered exhibits this.
One last concern I had and to some degree still have... Is 5 power going to be low enough for me and my needs. YMMV but I have had 6.5-20 scopes in the past and 6.5 power has proven to be too powerful during certain activities I use my scopes for, namely hunting in brush or thick wooded areas. In my trip out in the field this was one of the things I was testing. I don’t think this is going to be as big of an issue with a low end of 5 power but it is still on my mind.
I would love to see SWFA come out with a scope with a low power around 3 but still powerful enough to be useful at 1000. I use 10 power scopes quite frequently at 1000 and while it’s useable, 12 power or higher would be great.
