• Online Training Rescheduled: Join Us Next Week And Get 25% Off Access

    Use code FRIDAY25 and SATURDAY25 to get 25% off access to Frank’s online training. Want a better deal? Subscribe to get 50% off.

    Get Access Subscribe

The Aimpoint Duty is pretty mid

Bluedog82

Major Hide Member
Full Member
Minuteman
Dec 18, 2019
1,096
798


The Duty isn’t bad by any stretch, but it’s also not exactly cutting edge in 2025. I wish Aimpoint would have modernized the design, and I agree with others who speculated that they didn’t in order to not take sales away from the T2.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Redlion
I have the Duty and T2 models, but don't see $300 or more difference between the two. The duty is also much smaller and lighter than the pro, and it is very noticeable on a lighter weight AR.

All three are reliable, so it just comes to preference and budget.
I believe the T2 is better under NV (no experience). The Duty is okay but not great.
 
About 6 months ago, I was about to buy the Duty. My shooting buddy has the T2 on his
SR-15 and it’s a great red dot.

I ended up going with the Sig Romeo 4XT Pro
We put his and mine side by side, and we both agree that the Sig is slightly clearer. Both have no bloom
However, the T2 does have a “cool factor”
 
$900 is too rich for my blood.

Quality cost money

IMG_9314.jpeg
 
The PRO is still the best red dot out there for actually shooting things with a red dot. FOV and head position forgiveness when shooting on the move. People should be happy they came out with a small form factory cheaper T2 for like $400-450. I don't use gay terms like mid, but that's exactly what it is, a mid priced optic designed with everything you need for a duty/hard use gun. Expecting more than that is unrealistic.
 
My duty rds models last an entire year before I swap out the battery, just like the T2. I swap batteries every year, regardless of how much longer it could last. I am surprised to see issues with the battery life by other members on this thread.