• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

The Soul of America

Been reading comments from MAGA patriots:
We work, some 40-70 hours a week
We have businesses, employ people and support this country
We have families
We go to church
We have broken no laws
We pay our taxes
We have children and families
We have morals and values
We love our country
We have fought, served and died for this country
And now we are the threat to democracy?
Fuck Joe Biden, Hunter and all who stand with him!
This is my stance, I’ll be calling my Congressman in morning.
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
 
Been reading comments from MAGA patriots:
We work, some 40-70 hours a week
We have businesses, employ people and support this country
We have families
We go to church
We have broken no laws
We pay our taxes
We have children and families
We have morals and values
We love our country
We have fought, served and died for this country
And now we are the threat to democracy?
Fuck Joe Biden, Hunter and all who stand with him!
This is my stance, I’ll be calling my Congressman in morning.
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Tell us how the call goes.......
 
The most disturbing thing about Biden's speech and the presentation is that it came right out of a Trump event. The siege mentality, the dire messaging, the 'end is nigh' urgency. This is escalation but not towards resolution or reconciliation. This is the manner of rhetoric that leads to conflict and there is ample historical precedent for this. Too bad.

Trump and MAGA are in no way American or Constitutionally aligned. Trump is an emotional over-reaction to the sustained and insidious assault on American exceptionalism and individualism by the mobilized left - who are not socialists, they're not marxists, they're something somehow worse. They want all the benefits, entitlements and luxuries of a fundamentally capitalist and private property centric society without the graft and sacrifice it takes to create and provide those things. It's not a 'sacrifice for the greater good', it's 'sacrifice for my good'.

Trump represents the beginning of classic European fascism - robber capitalism dressed up as patriotism. The mobilized left represent cultural terrorists who undermine Amercian culture by denying and degrading the individualism that makes America exceptional to begin with. Both are cancerous to the Soul of America. As long as each is seen as the only and necessary antidote to the other then the result is the same - the patient will die.
 
DrMg4FbTzcjk.jpeg
 
The most disturbing thing about Biden's speech and the presentation is that it came right out of a Trump event. The siege mentality, the dire messaging, the 'end is nigh' urgency. This is escalation but not towards resolution or reconciliation. This is the manner of rhetoric that leads to conflict and there is ample historical precedent for this. Too bad.

Trump and MAGA are in no way American or Constitutionally aligned. Trump is an emotional over-reaction to the sustained and insidious assault on American exceptionalism and individualism by the mobilized left - who are not socialists, they're not marxists, they're something somehow worse. They want all the benefits, entitlements and luxuries of a fundamentally capitalist and private property centric society without the graft and sacrifice it takes to create and provide those things. It's not a 'sacrifice for the greater good', it's 'sacrifice for my good'.

Trump represents the beginning of classic European fascism - robber capitalism dressed up as patriotism. The mobilized left represent cultural terrorists who undermine Amercian culture by denying and degrading the individualism that makes America exceptional to begin with. Both are cancerous to the Soul of America. As long as each is seen as the only and necessary antidote to the other then the result is the same - the patient will die.
Ahhh thought I muted you. Regardless you are incorrect on multiple fronts. Your perspective reads like someone who doesn't reside here, or at least does not have your ears on the train tracks of America.

The flavor of modern progressive Democrat in America are most certainly Marxist, and espouse Marxist/Maoist philosophy like critical theory/CRT, and "equity."

I used to dislike Trump, thought he was a loudmouth idiot, but he grew on me once I woke up, I started to glean things with my own eyes. I thought he might have fascist tendencies. But he turned out to be an all out free market capitalist with some libertarian propencity, makes sense, and it's what we needed. He was a strong leader, though chaotic, and abrasive. There is no having someone who can shake things up without being abrasive. His pro America stance was different, and what was required, perhaps he is too nationalistic for fucks who live in other countries, or globalists. If you can show me with definitive proof that he ever acted in a fashistic manner then please do so. I don't think there has been anyting in recent memory more fashist and authoritarian then the failing vaccine mandates, layoffs, and lockdowns imposed by the progressives. Oh and let's not even get into their goon squad brown shirts like Antifa, and BLM, who's fascist now?

Though I find chaos follows Trump, right now I'll take what I can get if it rids us of the progressive and Neo Con cancer that's eating the country.
 
Ahhh thought I muted you. Regardless you are incorrect on multiple fronts. Your perspective reads like someone who doesn't reside here, or at least does not have your ears on the train tracks of America.

The flavor of modern progressive Democrat in America are most certainly Marxist, and espouse Marxist/Maoist philosophy like critical theory/CRT, and "equity."

I used to dislike Trump, thought he was a loudmouth idiot, but he grew on me once I woke up, I started to glean things with my own eyes. I thought he might have fascist tendencies. But he turned out to be an all out free market capitalist with some libertarian propencity, makes sense, and it's what we needed. He was a strong leader, though chaotic, and abrasive. There is no having someone who can shake things up without being abrasive. His pro America stance was different, and what was required, perhaps he is too nationalistic for fucks who live in other countries, or globalists. If you can show me with definitive proof that he ever acted in a fashistic manner then please do so. I don't think there has been anyting in recent memory more fashist and authoritarian then the failing vaccine mandates, layoffs, and lockdowns imposed by the progressives. Oh and let's not even get into their goon squad brown shirts like Antifa, and BLM, who's fascist now?

Though I find chaos follows Trump, right now I'll take what I can get if it rids us of the progressive and Neo Con cancer that's eating the country.

Mate, perhaps read about what you think you know.

"To each, according to his contribution" Karl Marx. Marxism isn't about equality of outcome, at all, that's a misunderstanding about his views and what was eventually implemented in Russia wasn't really Marxism, but more Leninism who had a particular penchant for violent revolutionary guards in the proletariat. Marxism was centered on the control of the means of production and thought, economically, that a centrally and benevolent gov would create a more optimal outcome - ironically, Singapore is probably the closets to real life Marxism w.r.t benevolent and non-democratic govt holding sway on large parts of society for optimal outcomes.

Maoism, was an adaptation of Marxism to suit the demographics of China - agricultural peasantry. Neither had anything to say about critical race theory as it didn't even exist then.

Fascism - well, while able to be confused with ideas about fashion (like brown shirts), it's not really, or even at all.

In the same way that it's important to look up velocity, kinetic energy, dispersion etc when comparing calibers for specific tasks, if you're going to bandy about criticisms of political analysis (which this thread is), actually take time to understand the theories being discussed. Or don't, and just come across as a retard. Your choice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SledDog
Mate, perhaps read about what you think you know.

"To each, according to his contribution" Karl Marx. Marxism isn't about equality of outcome, at all, that's a misunderstanding about his views and what was eventually implemented in Russia wasn't really Marxism, but more Leninism who had a particular penchant for violent revolutionary guards in the proletariat. Marxism was centered on the control of the means of production and thought, economically, that a centrally and benevolent gov would create a more optimal outcome - ironically, Singapore is probably the closets to real life Marxism w.r.t benevolent and non-democratic govt holding sway on large parts of society for optimal outcomes.

Maoism, was an adaptation of Marxism to suit the demographics of China - agricultural peasantry. Neither had anything to say about critical race theory as it didn't even exist then.

Fascism - well, while able to be confused with ideas about fashion (like brown shirts), it's not really, or even at all.

In the same way that it's important to look up velocity, kinetic energy, dispersion etc when comparing calibers for specific tasks, if you're going to bandy about criticisms of political analysis (which this thread is), actually take time to understand the theories being discussed. Or don't, and just come across as a retard. Your choice.
"Mate?" Ohhhhhh I got ya, so I was correct, you don't live here! And of course you can lable someone a fascist, however when I ask for proof, or evidence, you ignore the request, because you can't find any
evidence to back up your bull shit. So... time to STFU.
 
"Mate?" Ohhhhhh I got ya, so I was correct, you don't live here! And of course you can lable someone a fascist, however when I ask for proof, or evidence, you ignore the request, because you can't find any
evidence to back up your bull shit. So... time to STFU.
I think that muppet in your avator is smarter than you.
 
Lol, at least I'm not the one conflating nationalism, and patriotism with fascism.
those two former labels, taken to extreme, are the latter. Ingredients necessary for the recipe. They're not exclusive of eachother. throw in some xenophobia, some 'they're out to get us or against us' to both foreigners and domestic dissenters and you have a well baked fascist pie. If that does not make you think of examples of BOTH side's rhetoric then frankly you're either disingenuous in your argument or as stupid as I suspected.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Sako man
those two former labels, taken to extreme, are the latter. Ingredients necessary for the recipe. They're not exclusive of eachother. throw in some xenophobia, some 'they're out to get us or against us' to both foreigners and domestic dissenters and you have a well baked fascist pie. If that does not make you think of examples of BOTH side's rhetoric then frankly you're either disingenuous in your argument or as stupid as I suspected.
Fascism is Dan Andrew's having old women nearly beaten to death by police because she wanted to be outside.
 
Mate, perhaps read about what you think you know.

"To each, according to his contribution" Karl Marx. Marxism isn't about equality of outcome, at all, that's a misunderstanding about his views and what was eventually implemented in Russia wasn't really Marxism, but more Leninism who had a particular penchant for violent revolutionary guards in the proletariat. Marxism was centered on the control of the means of production and thought, economically, that a centrally and benevolent gov would create a more optimal outcome - ironically, Singapore is probably the closets to real life Marxism w.r.t benevolent and non-democratic govt holding sway on large parts of society for optimal outcomes.

Maoism, was an adaptation of Marxism to suit the demographics of China - agricultural peasantry. Neither had anything to say about critical race theory as it didn't even exist then.

Fascism - well, while able to be confused with ideas about fashion (like brown shirts), it's not really, or even at all.

In the same way that it's important to look up velocity, kinetic energy, dispersion etc when comparing calibers for specific tasks, if you're going to bandy about criticisms of political analysis (which this thread is), actually take time to understand the theories being discussed. Or don't, and just come across as a retard. Your choice.
Yiu sure talk about commies in a positive light
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Sako man
Yiu sure talk about commies in a positive light
no I don't. I reference them correctly. The calling of someone 'commie' is now the same as calling someone 'racist'. It's lost all value becuase it's become more of a meme than an accurately applied label. I'm informed, not conforming.
 
Looks like we have the thought police on board now. Regulating speech and definitions, how nice! Can't imagine what is next? :ROFLMAO:
Just bringing some facts to the conversation. You can think and feel however you want, doesn't mean your feelings are right though does it?
 
Just because a few million people think it, does not mean it's true.
Somerset Maughm.. 1900 something
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sako man
Just bringing some facts to the conversation. You can think and feel however you want, doesn't mean your feelings are right though does it?
If I want your advise, I'll seek professional help. Since I didn't not mention you, your reply seems to be an admission of guilt.
Now go play somewhere else.
 
Beware the uncompromising zealot, because they are everybody's enemy. If you don't think like them, you are their enemy, bc your different thoughts threaten their zealot way.
Our Constitution guarantees them the right to think and speak their zealot way,
Just like it allows the rest of us to be us.

I'm not a lower form of life just because a zealot doesn't like the way I look, the things I do, the things I say, the job I have..

The zealot is the problem here, not us.

Was the man who said this a zealot?

"If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.

It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field!

Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"

- Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775
 
  • Like
Reactions: XP1K
One man's freedom fighter, is another man's terrorist.

Mr. Henry was/is a classic example of this.
 
Just curious if you have any military experience? Or are you another ignorant cunt spouting shit?
If your kids were smart, they would have talked to their senior medic and had them put it in the system as been given.......

But apparently the apple doesn't fall far from the tree in your case......

Doc
 
  • Haha
Reactions: MCSO1357