- Thread starter GONE BAD
- Start date
Fuck Jack,
I'm pretty sure that's what the Boss said. The twitter attorneys looked like they were about to lose their retainers. I think an investigation might have been mentioned?
What's this all about?
Well atleast he didn't get Khoshoggied??
That was 3 months ago when jack thought he had balls!
Think he is singing a different tune today!
By the way; the 1st amendment probably allows politicians to access social media. Your bias is astounding. Just for shits and giggles, where do you stand on the rest of the amendments? In particular the 2nd?
Hi,
The meeting was to discuss why Trumps Twitter account recently lost so many followers...you know; like nothing more important is going on in the world.......
Trump does not believe the lose was due to the following being bots and spam accounts. Who Cares??? Way more important things to be concerned about as President of USA.
Sincerely,
Theis
The meeting was to discuss why Trumps Twitter account recently lost so many followers...you know; like nothing more important is going on in the world.......
Trump does not believe the lose was due to the following being bots and spam accounts. Who Cares??? Way more important things to be concerned about as President of USA.
Sincerely,
Theis
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. I think I've been pretty straight forward how I feel about our freedoms or at least the freedoms we still have left. I don't give a fuck if you own a tiny .22 Cricket or a 30mm Vulcan. As long as your gun ownership doesn't affect mine or anyone else's, we're cool.
The Second Amendment has nothing to do with hunting or shooting sports. It's to defend ourselves from a tyrannical government. Civilians have the right to own the same guns cops and military have. Period! That's my simple take on it.
Are you fucking serious? That's what the meeting was about?
That's gotta be embarrassing as hell.
President Trump meets with Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey after accusing platform of bias
President Donald Trump met with Twitter chief executive Jack Dorsey on Tuesday, hours after Trump erroneously accused the social media company of "discriminatory" behavior toward conservative users.
Twitter CEO Gently Tells Trump: Your ‘Lost’ Followers Are Bots
Jack Dorsey may have wanted to use Tuesday’s meeting to talk up Twitter’s efforts to fight the opioid epidemic, but the president had more important things on his mind.
www.thedailybeast.com
President Trump meets with Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey after accusing platform of bias
President Donald Trump met with Twitter chief executive Jack Dorsey on Tuesday, hours after Trump erroneously accused the social media company of "discriminatory" behavior toward conservative users.www.cnn.com
Twitter CEO Gently Tells Trump: Your ‘Lost’ Followers Are Bots
Jack Dorsey may have wanted to use Tuesday’s meeting to talk up Twitter’s efforts to fight the opioid epidemic, but the president had more important things on his mind.www.thedailybeast.com
Oh, man.. That's incredible.
Poor Jack. I don't like that fucker at all, but I empathize with having to explain "difficult concepts" to old fogies with massive egos.
Like it or not, social media has become the "go-to" news outlet for much of society. Twitter already controls POTUS' response feed where negative comments by the same recurring people (Krassenstein brothers, etc.) are always at the top of the feed. Additionally, Twitter shadow-bans conservative voices.
https://thinkprogress.org/who-are-the-krassenstein-brothers-251f68acf674/
This is an organized attempt by the left to control the narrative. The comment above about antitrust laws is very much applicable.
I think @Jack got a dose of reality.
https://thinkprogress.org/who-are-the-krassenstein-brothers-251f68acf674/
This is an organized attempt by the left to control the narrative. The comment above about antitrust laws is very much applicable.
I think @Jack got a dose of reality.
I think/feel/believe (none of which are non-despicable activities) that the ComSocialists (Did I just coin a new word? My spellcheck seems to think/feel/believe...) find few, if any, of the Enumerated Rights under the BOR to be acceptable. I suspect that's largely because few, if any, of those folks can actually understand most of them (that requires an attention span greater than that of the average goldfish.
I wonder if they have even the retention span of goldfish. OAC-D fits this one better, by my estimation. Did anybody catch her IQ score; should be interesting (if actually relevant) data?
Maybe it's the big words, like 'shall', and 'not'. Maybe it's the redefinition of many key words by the current MSM version of New Speak.
Maybe I shouldn't care.
It would appear that I still do, more's the pity...
I wonder if they have even the retention span of goldfish. OAC-D fits this one better, by my estimation. Did anybody catch her IQ score; should be interesting (if actually relevant) data?
Maybe it's the big words, like 'shall', and 'not'. Maybe it's the redefinition of many key words by the current MSM version of New Speak.
Maybe I shouldn't care.
It would appear that I still do, more's the pity...
Similar threads
