Rifle Scopes Using Eyepiece Projection Photography for Riflescopes

Discogodfather

Private
Minuteman
Mar 12, 2019
60
33
San Francisco, CA
Years ago I started digiscoping with my spotting scopes. Basically, you can digiscope by:

1) Holding a camera behind the eyepiece and taking a picture (most common)

2) Using a special mount to hold a camera directly behind the eyepiece without using a camera lens (also referred to us eyepiece projection photography), usually uses a DSLR or removable lens camera.

3) Taking the eyepiece out and using the objective itself as a lens using a special adapter that eliminates the ocular, usually uses a DSLR or removable lens camera.


I always wondered why you couldn't just use riflescope as a lens without using an actual camera lens. Obviously in method #3 you can't remove the eyepiece, so method #2 would be the only way.

Method #1 has the disadvantage of having to go through the cameras lens which accentuates all the optical problems with whatever lens you are using.

So I tried holding up a DSLR camera without a lens to see if I could get an image. I get basically a fuzzy haze and the faint outline of the reticle. When I do this with method to a spotting scope, it's clear and pretty readable. What's up? Why can't I get a decent image? I am holding the camera CCD sensor at the proper eye relief.
 
In modern cameras don't the lens have to connect to and communicate with the camera to control things like aperture and exposure? How do you plan to work around this? I'm sure it is possible but it I think you would need to rewrite the camera software. Or are you planing to use a film camera?