Re: Video of the year!!!
Couldn't finish it out.
Couldn't finish it out.
Re: Video of the year!!!
Agreed, gave it about 30secs..
Agreed, gave it about 30secs..
Re: Video of the year!!!
Yeah, totally misleading title. I lasted about 20-25 seconds through that crap, before hitting the close button.
Raise some standards, people. Please.
Yeah, totally misleading title. I lasted about 20-25 seconds through that crap, before hitting the close button.
Raise some standards, people. Please.
Re: Video of the year!!!
LOL, people can't understand the quality of a video. It needs to be a video of the year...
LOL, people can't understand the quality of a video. It needs to be a video of the year...
Re: Video of the year!!!
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: nock</div><div class="ubbcode-body">LOL, people can't understand the quality of a video. It needs to be a video of the year... </div></div>
I do bielive that there are alot better videos out there!!!!
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: nock</div><div class="ubbcode-body">LOL, people can't understand the quality of a video. It needs to be a video of the year... </div></div>
I do bielive that there are alot better videos out there!!!!
Re: Video of the year!!!
yeah made 19 sec before i gave up.. but did like the bourbon ad before the video!!
yeah made 19 sec before i gave up.. but did like the bourbon ad before the video!!
Re: Video of the year!!!
False advertising....
False advertising....
Re: Video of the year!!!
what the "h" was that?
what the "h" was that?
Re: Video of the year!!!
Are we looking at the same thing??? I thought you guys new what quality was; sorry for you’re un-understanding of what greatness is. Look at the 1:35 sec and you can't see that???
Are we looking at the same thing??? I thought you guys new what quality was; sorry for you’re un-understanding of what greatness is. Look at the 1:35 sec and you can't see that???
Re: Video of the year!!!
34 seconds I'll never get back
Correction, I went back and watched 1:35-1:40, so 39 seconds of my life I'll never get back.
34 seconds I'll never get back
Correction, I went back and watched 1:35-1:40, so 39 seconds of my life I'll never get back.
Re: Video of the year!!!
Are you sure you are a MAN??? This is the best video since Gone With the Wind??? You guys.
Are you sure you are a MAN??? This is the best video since Gone With the Wind??? You guys.
Re: Video of the year!!!
Not so cool.
Not so cool.
Re: Video of the year!!!
WTF? over
WTF? over
Re: Video of the year!!!
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: nock</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Are you sure you are a MAN??? This is the best video since Gone With the Wind??? You guys. </div></div>
How did you make it to 1400+ posts?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: nock</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Are you sure you are a MAN??? This is the best video since Gone With the Wind??? You guys. </div></div>
How did you make it to 1400+ posts?
Re: Video of the year!!!
worst video of the year, total waste of time.
worst video of the year, total waste of time.
Re: Video of the year!!!
<object width="425" height="350"> <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/J7koehRPuAY"></param> <param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/J7koehRPuAY" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"> </embed></object>
Better?
<object width="425" height="350"> <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/L_fCqg92qks"></param> <param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/L_fCqg92qks" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"> </embed></object>
<object width="425" height="350"> <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/J7koehRPuAY"></param> <param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/J7koehRPuAY" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"> </embed></object>
Better?
<object width="425" height="350"> <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/L_fCqg92qks"></param> <param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/L_fCqg92qks" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"> </embed></object>
Similar threads
