• Quick Shot Challenge: What’s the dumbest shooting myth you’ve heard?

    Drop it in the replies for the chance to win a free shirt!

    Join the contest

Rifle Scopes Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

ReaperDriver

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
  • Sep 5, 2009
    1,342
    170
    60
    Vegas Baby!
    Was browsing scopes in the <$1K range and I ran across the Bushnell Elite 4200 FFP offering. I know the Viper is all teh buzz here, but how would you compare the two? They both seem to have similar features (illum reticle, FFP, etc) and are at the same price point. Any big differences?

    How do the folks with the Bushnells like your scopes?
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    At a quick glance, the 4200 is more expensive, offered in mildot only, no zero-stop, zeros on the turrets aren't illuminated, and the warranty doesn't even come close to comparing to the vortex.
    It does have the advantage of being readily available, though, and if you are not looking for an moa scope and can deal with the other short-comings I'd say it's a viable option...
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    We sell both scopes. I have only seen the PST at SHOT SHOW and from what I saw I was impressed with. The Turrets felt good and the looked clean. I have are a really good feeling about the Vortex PST but I could be wrong.

    We have gotten good feedback on the Bushnell FFP we have sold and I have handled a few of them. For the dollar value the Bushnell’s are very nice.


    Mike @ CST
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    Every rifle scope I've ever owned has had to have factory service at some point (yeah, I know, buy once... I have a good friend that has gone through several NF NXS. Think what you want...)

    With that in mind, Bushnell has a reputation as one of the most unresponsive companies when it comes to customer service/warranty repair. Compare that to a company that is pre-selling its new model like hotcakes, yes because of its feature set, but also because of their tremendous customer service reputation and guarantee.

    The Bushnell looked like a good offering from a technical perspective, but I prefer the EBR reticle on the PST.

    John
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ReaperDriver</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Good stuff, thanks guys. Just comparing. I'm not really happy about having to wait until August tho.... :-( </div></div>

    Good things come to those who wait... I hope.

    John
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    I have personally handled both. I shoot the SWFA 3-9 which is a Bushnell derivative on my 556 rifle.

    Both scopes are full of win. I like the Vortex better on features. Both have awesome glass. Both feel durable.
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    You can put your hands on one and not the other, that should be an idicator of the weight that should be put into opinions about the two currently.

    IF the Vortex is all its been advertised to be once it appears, I'd say Vortex. I'm not paying money to be a beta tester though....
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BCP</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Libertyoptics as the 6-24 FFP for 769 and I think it's 800 at SWFA. However with the PST's "almost" out now I think it would be prudent to wait a little longer. </div></div>
    You must have a special internet connection, cuz when I go to SWFA and look at their Bushnell 4200 6-24ffp I get this:
    http://swfa.com/Bushnell-6-24x50-Elite-4200-30mm-Rifle-Scope-P45483.aspx
    But they have a 110% price match guarantee, and it DOES appear to be $769 at Liberty, so one could get it for about [email protected] I were looking for a MIL/MIL scope I might be jumping on that.
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    I guess if you like the Mil-Dot it is a good deal. I prefer a hash mark style reticle myself. If the Viper PST is all that, these should make more than a couple larger manufacturers rethink their reticle options
    smile.gif
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    My Bushnell Elite 3200 only came with a 1 year warranty. That right there is why I would go with the Vortex.

    On a side note, my Bushnell scope smelled like Japanese food when I first opened it. It made me laugh. Maybe they package food in the same factory.
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jeffersonv</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I'm pretty sure I didn't get any kind of bro deal and I paid $739 at Liberty Optics for the 4-16 FFP PST.

    That's pretty shmokin' turkey.

    Less than I expected anyways. </div></div>
    I'm callin' BS on this one! That's $110 cheaper than anyone else is selling that scope for...gonna need a pic of the invoice when you get it.
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jeffersonv</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I'm pretty sure I didn't get any kind of bro deal and I paid $739 at Liberty Optics for the 4-16 FFP PST.

    That's pretty shmokin' turkey.

    Less than I expected anyways. </div></div>

    You mean this one for $849?
    http://www.libertyoptics.com/index1.html

    Yeah, unless you got a 'special' deal or ordered before they had the price set I'm calling BS as well. And you don't have to offer up an explanation it don't phase me a bit either. Just my opinion.

    Michael
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    I may be speaking out of turn. But I am having a hard time believing you guys are going for this Vortex stuff. You are dealing with an import company that has been in business for HOW LONG?? What kind of a long term track record do they really have??

    From what you guys say some of their product is pretty good. I do not doubt any of you guys on that. but it still does not make Vortex a Magic Bean?? How many of the $2,000 scopes were actually bought and put through the ringer that some of you guys put them through?? My bet is not very many.

    I have been in the sporting good area for close to 40 years. And actually worked in the business for a good part of those years. I have seen a lot of companies like Vortex come and go.

    Hopefully for you guys I hope Vortex hangs around. And I hope their products hold up to the standards that you want. But I have read so much about a scope(PST). And it does not even exist yet in the hands of a shooter. I have never heard such hype. No wait a minute I did hear that much hype about a product one time. It was the Ruger P85, and for the guys in the know-you know how that one turned out.

    Lordy guys wait a month or two and you will probably buy them for a good bit less. Heck I have seen the new Sightron SIII selling for a couple hundred less than what the first ones sold for.

    I do not know for sure about the Vortex scope quality. But their marketing is second to none.

    I am probably going to flamed for saying this. And so be it. but I am only saying that I have seen it before.

    And before you flame me just think about what I said. I in no way attacked the quality of the Vortex scopes. So don't start on me for that.

    But I have seen alot of products over the last 40 years that had lifetime warranties when they were new. And these warranties were worth nothing when the company went out of business 5 or 10 years later!! Just give that a thought before you lay down $1,000 or $2,000 for a scope. Especially when some of you guys use a scope as hard as you do. Just an opinion. Tom.
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    Soooo, should we buy Leupold?

    Who's to say a company that has been around longer won't go out of business before a newer company with better products, pricing, and service?
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: HOGGHEAD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I may be speaking out of turn. But I am having a hard time believing you guys are going for this Vortex stuff. You are dealing with an import company that has been in business for HOW LONG?? What kind of a long term track record do they really have??

    From what you guys say some of their product is pretty good. I do not doubt any of you guys on that. but it still does not make Vortex a Magic Bean?? How many of the $2,000 scopes were actually bought and put through the ringer that some of you guys put them through?? My bet is not very many.

    I have been in the sporting good area for close to 40 years. And actually worked in the business for a good part of those years. I have seen a lot of companies like Vortex come and go.

    Hopefully for you guys I hope Vortex hangs around. And I hope their products hold up to the standards that you want. But I have read so much about a scope(PST). And it does not even exist yet in the hands of a shooter. I have never heard such hype. No wait a minute I did hear that much hype about a product one time. It was the Ruger P85, and for the guys in the know-you know how that one turned out.

    Lordy guys wait a month or two and you will probably buy them for a good bit less. Heck I have seen the new Sightron SIII selling for a couple hundred less than what the first ones sold for.

    I do not know for sure about the Vortex scope quality. But their marketing is second to none.

    I am probably going to flamed for saying this. And so be it. but I am only saying that I have seen it before.

    And before you flame me just think about what I said. I in no way attacked the quality of the Vortex scopes. So don't start on me for that.

    But I have seen alot of products over the last 40 years that had lifetime warranties when they were new. And these warranties were worth nothing when the company went out of business 5 or 10 years later!! Just give that a thought before you lay down $1,000 or $2,000 for a scope. Especially when some of you guys use a scope as hard as you do. Just an opinion. Tom. </div></div>

    Have you seen any of the reviews on the Vortex optics? Have you heard of their awesome customer service and product quality? Check out the review Lowlight did on their Razor HD and see what kind of paces he put it through. I'm guessing not and don't take this as a flame, just asking questions.

    I agree this release probably could've been handled better, but with their reputation it is a "no-brainer" for myseld and many others.

    Mike
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    If you read my post closely I did not attack the quality of the scope what so ever. I was very careful to avoid doing that. Read my post again and you will see that. All that I am saying-and I will reiterate--if you buy one you are putting alot of confidence in a company who has only been around for a short period of time. And in a company that is not a mfr. They are strictly an importer. So the value can drop drastically if any problems show up, or they just close their importing doors, and start importing tomorrow under a different name. I have seen it many times in the past. Why do you think companies advertise how long they have been in business??

    All I am saying is be careful. Obviously it is your money, and you can throw it around. But if something goes wrong two or five years from now, just remember where you heard it first. Most companies always come into a market strong then fade away. That is just the way it is. That is all I am saying. I AM NOT attacking their quality. And yes I did read the inspiring reviews. Tom.
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    My apologies, I took it for second guessing the quality... as well as the warranty and the people behind it.

    I have not been in this business long, hell only been shooting guns for the last 9 years as a hunter and only recently got into the long range shooting deal. I however after talking/shooting/hunting with a few members on here who personally got me started in this gig and who are affiliated with a very reputable company I have ZERO concerns about this order. I agree it could've been handled a bit differently, but hell they estimated a mid jun shipment, and guess what? They are a week late in getting the first batch through and the rest have the go ahead... Not that big of a deal imho...

    In my opinion, I compare your comparison to not buying from a small hardware/autoparts/machineshop/landscaper/fencebuilder/lemonade stand because they are new. True Vortex has only been in the business a few years, but what they have done in those few years is AMAZING.... good 'nough for me! You undoubtely have more experienc than myself, but I have a good feeling about this. Time will tell and I hope I'm not wrong...

    Mike
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: HOGGHEAD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If you read my post closely I did not attack the quality of the scope what so ever. I was very careful to avoid doing that. Read my post again and you will see that. All that I am saying-and I will reiterate--if you buy one you are putting alot of confidence in a company who has only been around for a short period of time. And in a company that is not a mfr. They are strictly an importer. So the value can drop drastically if any problems show up, or they just close their importing doors, and start importing tomorrow under a different name. I have seen it many times in the past. Why do you think companies advertise how long they have been in business??

    All I am saying is be careful. Obviously it is your money, and you can throw it around. But if something goes wrong two or five years from now, just remember where you heard it first. Most companies always come into a market strong then fade away. That is just the way it is. That is all I am saying. I AM NOT attacking their quality. And yes I did read the inspiring reviews. Tom. </div></div>

    I get what you're saying and agree. 'Flavor of the month' comes to mind. Bushnell/Bausch & Lomb have been making great scopes for 60+ years, so there's a track record there.

    I can't speak to their customer service because the 3 Elite 4xxx scopes that I have, have all worked fine for years and I've not needed to send one back.

    Anyhow, I'd like to check out that Razor for sure.

    I wish them luck, but there's too small a sample size out there, to make any hard and fast claims.

    Chris
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: HOGGHEAD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I may be speaking out of turn. But I am having a hard time believing you guys are going for this Vortex stuff. You are dealing with an import company that has been in business for HOW LONG?? What kind of a long term track record do they really have??

    From what you guys say some of their product is pretty good. I do not doubt any of you guys on that. but it still does not make Vortex a Magic Bean?? How many of the $2,000 scopes were actually bought and put through the ringer that some of you guys put them through?? My bet is not very many.

    I have been in the sporting good area for close to 40 years. And actually worked in the business for a good part of those years. I have seen a lot of companies like Vortex come and go.

    Hopefully for you guys I hope Vortex hangs around. And I hope their products hold up to the standards that you want. But I have read so much about a scope(PST). And it does not even exist yet in the hands of a shooter. I have never heard such hype. No wait a minute I did hear that much hype about a product one time. It was the Ruger P85, and for the guys in the know-you know how that one turned out.

    Lordy guys wait a month or two and you will probably buy them for a good bit less. Heck I have seen the new Sightron SIII selling for a couple hundred less than what the first ones sold for.

    I do not know for sure about the Vortex scope quality. But their marketing is second to none.

    I am probably going to flamed for saying this. And so be it. but I am only saying that I have seen it before.

    And before you flame me just think about what I said. I in no way attacked the quality of the Vortex scopes. So don't start on me for that.

    But I have seen alot of products over the last 40 years that had lifetime warranties when they were new. And these warranties were worth nothing when the company went out of business 5 or 10 years later!! Just give that a thought before you lay down $1,000 or $2,000 for a scope. Especially when some of you guys use a scope as hard as you do. Just an opinion. Tom. </div></div>

    I'll right, I'll respond with some facts that I found out while researching Vortex before I bought my first one.

    Vortex is not an import company. They are a family owned company who's founder is a 3 tour Vietnam Vet and has been in the optics business for almost 3 decades. I can't speak to what they did 30 years ago, but now all of their products are designed, R&D'd, tested and serviced in house at their facilities in Middleton, WI. So unlike a lot of their competitors they actually just sub-contract their manufacturing overseas with a number of contractors. Now if they were just going overseas and picking out scopes that were already developed and slapping a Vortex logo on them I might agree with you, but that is not the case.

    They've also proven time and time again here that they have customer service unlike I've ever seen and an unheard of warranty too. USO might be close, but they are in a different price point. Several times here I've seen guys asking questions of scopes when someone from Vortex chimes in that a new scope is in the mail to them to remedy a problem. I've also heard stories of free upgrades, shipping paid both ways, etc etc.

    Also, I'm curious, if you could kindly give me a list of American scope manufacturers that you think are not "importers", I'd be interested to hear that info too. I'm not saying that Vortex is the best thing since sliced bread, they have their faults I'm sure. What I am saying is that your facts....aren't exactly the facts and should be checked.

    Back to the contract manufacturer vs an importer. Damn near EVERY company in America (and worldwide) is a contract manufacturer these days. Do you think these companies all own their own factories or are they contracticing someone else to make a product to their specs? Nike, Dell, SWFA, Nokia, Bushnell, Kitchenaid, Sears, Home Depot....etc etc etc. It's a global economy, it's not about who assembles it anymore, it's about how well and to what spec it's assembled and how the company that sells it stands behind it.

    Jason
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BCP</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I think they'll be fine. Some will probably break but Vortex will fix them. Price is the only thing I'm wondering about; either they will go up, or they will go down later as supply catches up with demand. </div></div>

    The Razor has not dropped at all and they have now taken incentives away (no free rings anymore). If anything the Viper PST will increase in price if it is as good as it looks on paper.

    Who else makes a scope with all the features of the Viper PST and the incredible warranty on top of that. Great reticle, superb build quality, warranty that only a couple of the finest scope makers will match. No-brainer and their sales go to prove that they know what they are doing vs all of the other scope makers at this time. They have a clue, listen to consumers and focus (no pun intended).

    We will see if the likes of Bushnell, Nikon, etc. wake up and see the money that they are leaving on the table, but I feel that they also think that the Vortex Sightron market is a niche that they could care less about. Big mistake IMO. Vortex has a plan and it seems to be falling into place with each new release of a new product. Great company if their scopes are any indication
    smile.gif
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    I have a Bushnell 6-24X and 3-12X FFP models in Mil / Mil here. I actually just mounted the 3-12X to test out but I pulled the rifle i had it on off line to send to GAP for a new barrel.

    But I can see about beating the piss out of the Bushnell over the next week. and see how they fare.

    I haven't played with the PST, I did see them briefly at Shot, but beyond that I can't say.

    I think Jason's words ring very true in this case... both of the scopes are basically coming from under the same roof, so it's just a case of who does a better job spec'ing out the scope and making sure the quality is there from one to another.
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I have to make a correction to the above... apparently the Viper is spec'd out of the Philippines and it is not coming from Japan... so the proof will definitely have to be in the pudding.

    </div></div>

    Viper is mfg'd in Phillipines. Glass is Japanese.

    http://www.opticstalk.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=20674&PN=4

    Quote from Scott@Vortex about halfway down.

    Could not find a source either way on the Bushnell, unless you know for sure it's mfg'd in Japan, I've read that Bushnell has some of their scopes built in China and the Phillipines.

    John
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    Glass isn't the end all, the factory in this case is a major player in terms of quality and durability, so you have to look at the Philipino track record compared to Japan... which for Asia, Japan rules the roost.

    Bushnell is definitely Japan, I have two here now...
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    I have to agree with jasonk.

    As for Japan vs Phillipines, I've had fewer issues with Filipino scopes than Japanese scopes the last 3-4 years. I think Japan has proven capable of ruling the roost, but choose not to do it anymore.

    Scott
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    Think Bushnell is all-japan?

    Look into Kanyuan Optics Product Co., Ltd.

    Most manufacturers have multiple sources depending on the product line and who could meet the specs at what price when they bid the manufacturing job out.

    A lot of the quality is in the QA measures included in the contract spec and control the product owner has in accepting or modifying the product. The worlds biggest customer for japanese and german high end CNC machines is china right now. The quality isnt always there today but there are plenty of enterprises heading in that direction so I would not be very surprised to see more and more precision work done in china.

     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Iron Worker</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Bushnell did me right. I called them up asking for a Turrent caps. They sent me two in a few days. What's the problem ?</div></div>

    My scope doesn't even have turrents!
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    Scott what is the percentage of people who push their scopes when you compare Japan to the Philippines ? What you are essentially saying is the sub $1k are performing better than the ones that well beyond $1000, even reaching the $2k range ?

    Which Filipino scopes are performing better would be my next question ?
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jasonk</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: HOGGHEAD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Tom. </div></div>

    I'll right, I'll respond with some facts that I found out while researching Vortex before I bought my first one.

    Vortex is not an import company. They are a family owned company who's founder is a 3 tour Vietnam Vet and has been in the optics business for almost 3 decades. I can't speak to what they did 30 years ago, but now all of their products are designed, R&D'd, tested and serviced in house at their facilities in Middleton, WI. So unlike a lot of their competitors they actually just sub-contract their manufacturing overseas with a number of contractors. Now if they were just going overseas and picking out scopes that were already developed and slapping a Vortex logo on them I might agree with you, but that is not the case.

    Jason </div></div>


    Maybe I should have said "trade name", but it is the same thing as an import company. It makes no difference where they spec. or service their product from. When you take a product that is produced 100% by a different company, then put your name on it, you are trade naming that product. And you are strictly an IMPORTER because no manufacturing is involved on your end. So you are strictly a marketing company, and a backer of the guarantee. So I definitely disagree with your assessment.

    And read my post carefully. I did not attack what they have done. They have done a gret job-and I said so. All I said is that they have NO TRACK RECORD. No matter how good of a job you do you can not have a track record in a couple of years. IT takes decades. I have seen many come and go.
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jasonk</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: HOGGHEAD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Tom. </div></div>

    Also, I'm curious, if you could kindly give me a list of American scope manufacturers that you think are not "importers", I'd be interested to hear that info too. I'm not saying that Vortex is the best thing since sliced bread, they have their faults I'm sure. What I am saying is that your facts....aren't exactly the facts and should be checked.

    Jason </div></div>



    First off their is a difference between an importer and a trade name. You can be one and not the other. Vortex is both. They are 100% dependant on their product being made by someone else. So if that spec. is changed by that mfr. then they are at their mercy. That is the worst of it.

    I would agree with you. Our American mfg. is in a sad state of affairs. And we are too dependent on foreign products. It is a real shame. I think we both agree on that.

    There are only a couple of American scope mfrs. out there. I also think we would agree with that.

    And yes Leupold and Burris are now importing alot of their products. I also agree with that. But here is the difference. Leupold is not "strictly" a trade name. It is the name of a company that does alot of it's manufacturing(still-who knows how long). But the bottom line is where did I mention American mfrs?? You are making a point about something I never even discussed??

    I know alot of you guys do not like Leupold scopes. But I am 100% sure of one thing. All you guys know that if you do have a problem, it will get fixed. Now someone might chime in with one or two horror stories about Leupold service. But that is drowned out by the thousands of scopes they have fixed.

    The sent my friend a new 3X9 and he flipped his four wheeler and destroyed the scope-and they still covered it. And he bought the scope in 1976---YES 1976. Now that is a TRACK RECORD. Where will Vortex be in 35 years????????????????? Who knows.

    I did not put my original post up to defend Leupold or any one else. Including the declining American scope mfrs. My post was meant to say that "trade name companies" come and go. Tom.
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Scott what is the percentage of people who push their scopes when you compare Japan to the Philippines ? What you are essentially saying is the sub $1k are performing better than the ones that well beyond $1000, even reaching the $2k range ?

    Which Filipino scopes are performing better would be my next question ? </div></div>

    Frank,

    I don't understand the first question.

    In terms of the quality/QC, what I'm saying is that the Filipino scopes, Vortex Diamondback, Viper, Nikon Monarch, and Buckmasters had had way fewer returns/issues for us than other scopes, like Sightron, Bushnell, Vortex Razor, which are Japanese. "Performing better" is a bit too generic.... "holding together", "not breaking" "not missing pieces/parts out of the box" "not disappointing customers" is the bottom line I'm getting at.

    IMO, the Filipino scopes are underrated, and the Japanese current production scopes are largely overrated, regardless of price, but the higher pricetag of the Japanese stamped scopes makes it all the more painful.

    One exception is the Trijicon Accupoints (Japan), these have been quite stellar for us in all phases, except for the lousy wire reticles.

    I think the PSTs will further elevate the status of Phillipine-made scopes.

    Again, this is my experience as a dealer.


    Scott
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    Scott

    You have to ask, is that the manufacturer in Japan or the spec they are held too in order to increase profits for the company name on the side of the scope.

    There is more than one exception...

    Nightforce has a long history there with no issue, as well as been a topic of much discussion so has March. Recently looking at the Weaver it seems to be well put together for $299 and all the Super Snipers I have seen are definitely on the higher end of the spectrum, so it almost goes to the discussion of track record ?

    Is the sliding scale of spec leading to more Q/C issues ?

    Why can a $1500 NF have a longer and much better track record than a $2000 Razor in its short tenure, and is the PST going to be a better scope by virtue of return rate ? Only time can answer that question, but in the big picture it is hard to answer flatly as each answered question opens the door for more.

    Personally in my experience Japan has a better track record, but then again I see very little of the scopes you mentioned. I tend to stick to proven entities.

    While i have the Bushnells here now, I will definitely have to put the screws to them and see what happens, but watching the one at Cup take a week long punishment over a 338LM, I have to say it can't be a total wash.
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jeffersonv</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Soooo, should we buy Leupold?

    Who's to say a company that has been around longer won't go out of business before a newer company with better products, pricing, and service? </div></div>

    What he said.
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jeffersonv</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jeffersonv</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Soooo, should we buy Leupold?

    Who's to say a company that has been around longer won't go out of business before a newer company with better products, pricing, and service? </div></div>

    What he said.
    </div></div>


    You guys want to make a bet as to who will be around the longest?? But then if you buy a product from a company that has only been around a couple of years?? I guess you already made your bet!! Tom.
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: HOGGHEAD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jeffersonv</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jeffersonv</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Soooo, should we buy Leupold?

    Who's to say a company that has been around longer won't go out of business before a newer company with better products, pricing, and service? </div></div>

    What he said.
    </div></div>

    You guys want to make a bet as to who will be around the longest?? But then if you buy a product from a company that has only been around a couple of years?? I guess you already made your bet!! Tom.</div></div>

    I made mine too with a Vortex Razor and Razor Spotting scope. I did a lot of research when I bought both of them and I have not been let down. I do understand that Vortex is relativly new to tactical market but I have to say their first venture is a good one.
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Scott

    You have to ask, is that the manufacturer in Japan or the spec they are held too in order to increase profits for the company name on the side of the scope.

    </div></div>

    I understand our point, but no scope is more intrinsically costly than the Razor, no manufacturer has paid more per scope than Vortex, no one has spec'd a scope higher, not Nightforce, not anybody. You saw the hiccups the Razor had. How is that possible with a "roost ruler"? Nikon, completely washed their hands of the tactical market. Nightforce, March, they all have their baggage. I can't answer precisely your question, but I know that it is so. The Elite 6500 scopes have been an inside industry joke since their introduction. Made in Japan.

    Anybody remember Hakko??

    Maybe it's as simple as Japan doesn't like us, and isn't comfortable making the best "rifle sighting devices" for us anymore. As I said, I know and have seen what they are capable of, but they aren't doing it anymore. Given the Razor's example, I tend to think it's their choice. But I simply do not know.

    All I'm saying is that "Made in Japan" does not mean the best of Asia anymore. That is old school thinking. My eyes and data tell me otherwise.

    To each their own.

    Scott
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LibertyOptics</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Scott what is the percentage of people who push their scopes when you compare Japan to the Philippines ? What you are essentially saying is the sub $1k are performing better than the ones that well beyond $1000, even reaching the $2k range ?

    Which Filipino scopes are performing better would be my next question ? </div></div>

    Frank,

    I don't understand the first question.

    In terms of the quality/QC, what I'm saying is that the Filipino scopes, Vortex Diamondback, Viper, Nikon Monarch, and Buckmasters had had way fewer returns/issues for us than other scopes, like Sightron, Bushnell, Vortex Razor, which are Japanese. "Performing better" is a bit too generic.... "holding together", "not breaking" "not missing pieces/parts out of the box" "not disappointing customers" is the bottom line I'm getting at.

    IMO, the Filipino scopes are underrated, and the Japanese current production scopes are largely overrated, regardless of price, but the higher pricetag of the Japanese stamped scopes makes it all the more painful.

    One exception is the Trijicon Accupoints (Japan), these have been quite stellar for us in all phases, except for the lousy wire reticles.

    I think the PSTs will further elevate the status of Phillipine-made scopes.

    Again, this is my experience as a dealer.


    Scott </div></div>

    Looks like the Filipino scopes are ctaching up to the "crappy" Japan made scopes.
    http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=1892361#Post1892361
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    Scott, we have had the NF discussion, dollar for dollar it is still the best scope on the market. You get down on them because you don't sell them. Like the hensoldt issue.

    I know bench rest guys swear by March, so I'd like know about their baggage because they never mention it. Everytime Jacob Gottfredson comes to RO he is crowing about March.

    The Super Sniper has been essentially flawless when you consider it is a new rollout similar to the Razor. So why the disconnect?

    I would also suggest you look at the new thread about the PST issue out of the box. One day on the market and it's got the owner down. So much for Filipino consistency.

    I admit, I know nothing of the 6500 series from Bushnell, however that choice like many of the choices Leupold has been making is a product of their corporate culture and not necessarily a manufacturing defect in my opinion. It again, we know you have a personal issue with Bushnell over the Spotters.

    I personally feel only time will tell and that it is way too early to make the judgements you are making. It's been my experience that guy who buy sub$1k scopes don't push them nearly as hard as the guys who invest heavily in their optics. It's a generalization, xceptions exsist, but that is usually the case.
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    Frank,

    You made a statement comparing the "Filipino track record" with Japan, which Filipino scopes are you referring to? Most appear to be hunting scopes, so I was wondering the basis for your statement.

    I see you are attacking my integrity. You are throwing out some lumber right now. Why?

    I have no issue with Hensoldt. I made one tiny little criticism of the product and the owner/importer goes off the deep end. Hensoldt has a problem with me, not vice versa. That was a cheap shot.

    Nightforce are great scopes, as I've said ad nauseum. I've just said many of their off the shelf scopes have suprisingly average glass, which is true. We take a lot of Nightforce on trade. I've looked through dozens upon dozens of them, not briefly, but very carefully, I take these statement very seriously.

    I'll back off the March statement, all I've seen were at SHOT, but they were very unimpressive, optically speaking, for these eyes.

    I've never said anything bad about the SS.

    My issues with Bushnell or any other manufacturer are never personal. Their CS has been quite bad the last year, ask anybody who has gone through it. We sell alot of their scopes.

    I made my statements, based on my experience, with sideboards on time frame (last four years) and brands mentioned. I really like Sightron, sell alot of them, but we've had more returns/issues with them the last year than all the Filipino scopes sold the last four. Just a statement of fact, based on my experience. Made in Japan. Just sayin'

    I will limit this post to defending myself. I'm surprised and disappointed you said what you said. I'll stack up my integrity and reputation against anybody, when it comes to looking out for my customers and speaking the truth. I'm very comfortable with my character and what I've accomplished to this point, and how I got here.

    Anyway, my common sense tells me it's time to move on.
     
    Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP

    Scott, I'm with you can we end this, because clearly I am not the only one who sees a pattern... comments repeated turn into that. You said baggage, I just asked in what form, because in my mind that means a problem, not an opinion on glass quality. Certainly, a lot of your repeated offhand comments contradict in a way that highlights products you sell, at the expense of those you don't. I don't say that with malice, but only to point out, its been noticed.

    But to answer your question about Philippine scopes:

    Years ago my 10/22 had as Simmons on it, Made in Philippines, i have seen several Nikons that were from there, as well a lot of guys use Burris scopes which I believe are made in the Philippines also. you have to figure I see, "hundreds' of different people from all walks who come through classes, and the variety of optics is wide and varied, but one thing is not. Scopes are the weakest link in the tactical rifle system and we see a lot of them, the good, the bad and the ugly, and we see them being used, so we gauge performance and not "looks" as we pass them down an aisle. I would think Nikon removed themselves from the tactical market not because of Japanese manufacturing, but because their product failed to make a dent, which could be because of where it was made.

    I get it, you see a cross section of returns and you're basing your opinion on that, I base mine on use and abuse... however the cross section of your returns must also follow the scopes that are sold and not compared to scopes you don't carry.