Re: Viper PST 6-24 vs Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24 FFP
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LibertyOptics</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Scott what is the percentage of people who push their scopes when you compare Japan to the Philippines ? What you are essentially saying is the sub $1k are performing better than the ones that well beyond $1000, even reaching the $2k range ?
Which Filipino scopes are performing better would be my next question ? </div></div>
Frank,
I don't understand the first question.
In terms of the quality/QC, what I'm saying is that the Filipino scopes, Vortex Diamondback, Viper, Nikon Monarch, and Buckmasters had had way fewer returns/issues for us than other scopes, like Sightron, Bushnell, Vortex Razor, which are Japanese. "Performing better" is a bit too generic.... "holding together", "not breaking" "not missing pieces/parts out of the box" "not disappointing customers" is the bottom line I'm getting at.
IMO, the Filipino scopes are underrated, and the Japanese current production scopes are largely overrated, regardless of price, but the higher pricetag of the Japanese stamped scopes makes it all the more painful.
One exception is the Trijicon Accupoints (Japan), these have been quite stellar for us in all phases, except for the lousy wire reticles.
I think the PSTs will further elevate the status of Phillipine-made scopes.
Again, this is my experience as a dealer.
Scott </div></div>
Looks like the Filipino scopes are ctaching up to the "crappy" Japan made scopes.
http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=1892361#Post1892361