I have read on here about people weighing brass and sorting it. Up to now I have never done it myself but I thought hmmm I wonder (this is normally where trouble starts). So I did weigh my 100 pieces of .308 Lapua brass. What I came up with kinda surprised me. The left side is the weight and the right is the number of pieces of brass for each given weight.
174.6-- 1
174.5-- 0
174.6-- 11
174.5-- 10
174.4-- 8
174.3-- 8
174.2-- 7
174.1-- 7
174.0-- 4
173.9-- <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #FF0000">0</span></span>
173.8-- <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #FF0000">0</span></span>
173.7-- <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #FF0000">0</span></span>
173.6-- <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #FF0000">0</span></span>
173.5-- <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #FF0000">0</span></span>
173.4-- <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #FF0000">0</span></span>
173.3-- 2
173.2-- 3
173.1-- 7
173.0-- 9
172.9-- 11
172.8-- 7
172.7-- 2
172.6-- 3
Now for the record this brass has been fired 3 times and has not been trimmed in any way. Some of the heavier pieces are bit shorter than some of the lighter ones.
So my reason for posting this was not to come to some kind of conclusion about this data or to help formulate a plan of action as much as it was just to ask if anyone else is seeing this and is this normal? And if this is normal why does brass like Lapua have this variance. I would expect variations in the weight of any brass. But I would have thought there would be a more even distribution between 172.6 and 174.6 or at least a single spike somewehre in the middle. It seems that with my 100 peices there are heavy ones and there are light ones with none from 173.4 to 173.9. I thought this was a little strange.
So is this the norm or is this just this box of 100? Im not gonna lose sleep over it either way just curious.
I also came across this post
http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=1267476
edit for spelling, fixed link
174.6-- 1
174.5-- 0
174.6-- 11
174.5-- 10
174.4-- 8
174.3-- 8
174.2-- 7
174.1-- 7
174.0-- 4
173.9-- <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #FF0000">0</span></span>
173.8-- <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #FF0000">0</span></span>
173.7-- <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #FF0000">0</span></span>
173.6-- <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #FF0000">0</span></span>
173.5-- <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #FF0000">0</span></span>
173.4-- <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #FF0000">0</span></span>
173.3-- 2
173.2-- 3
173.1-- 7
173.0-- 9
172.9-- 11
172.8-- 7
172.7-- 2
172.6-- 3
Now for the record this brass has been fired 3 times and has not been trimmed in any way. Some of the heavier pieces are bit shorter than some of the lighter ones.
So my reason for posting this was not to come to some kind of conclusion about this data or to help formulate a plan of action as much as it was just to ask if anyone else is seeing this and is this normal? And if this is normal why does brass like Lapua have this variance. I would expect variations in the weight of any brass. But I would have thought there would be a more even distribution between 172.6 and 174.6 or at least a single spike somewehre in the middle. It seems that with my 100 peices there are heavy ones and there are light ones with none from 173.4 to 173.9. I thought this was a little strange.
So is this the norm or is this just this box of 100? Im not gonna lose sleep over it either way just curious.
I also came across this post
http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=1267476
edit for spelling, fixed link