Best light transmission I’d lean towards a Zeiss HT (95%) with illuminated Reticle but it’s got a duplex reticle and max is only 3-12...... sooooo disregard.
Carry on...
Rifle Scopes What rifle scope has the best low light performance?
- Thread starter Willie Miller V
- Start date
Best light transmission I’d lean towards a Zeiss HT (95%) with illuminated Reticle but it’s got a duplex reticle and max is only 3-12...... sooooo disregard.
Carry on...
How about a Leupold MK5 3.6-18x50 Illuminated? Great glass, Light, capped windage, multiple reticles, FFP, MIL/ MIL or MOA/MOA, basically meets all your requirements. They also have a 5.5-25 of your needing more Mag, but it does obviously increases the length and weight.
Honestly the best newer scope out there in terms of lowlight discounting the Henny 72mm is the Zeiss V8 7-35x60mm. All my hunter friends swear by that scope for lowlight, but it's almost impossible to use in a tactical application. Not only does it have 40 moa total elevation, it has a zero stop system that limites the turret to 1 turn. Also .05 mrad clicks and a SFP only. Don't know why Zeiss blocked themselves off the market completely with that beautiful 60mm objective but they apparently wanted nothing to do with tactical or target people.
Guess they figured Hensolt had that end of the market covered, same as Swarovski and Khales. Seems that Zeiss / Swarovski take care of the hunting end of the spectrum and Hensolt / Khales have the tactical side.
I do agree with you. Zeiss glass and it’s light transmission is incredible. I have a set of their Gen 2 Victory 10x42 RF’s and am amazed by not only the quality of the glass, but the performance of the RF as well.
Last edited:
The illuminated reticle (#60) is a 4A. They do make a duplex but it's illuminated.
-Stooxie
The X5i has excellent low light performance. I prefer the 3.5x18x50 over the 5x25x56 because even though it has a smaller objective lens, it seems brighter to me. I also have a 2.3x18x56 Z8i which is supposed to have greater light transmission but still prefer the X5i because of the turrets, reticle and illumination. The X5i has 10 levels of illumination and the Z8i has 64. I hunt whitetails 85 days yearly and the X5i has been the best for me out of any that I have seen. Gary
Here is an interesting video on some very high end scopes on this topic.
I’m 3:50 in, heard “alpha level” glass mentioned multiple times...and he is comparing a Huskemaw and a NF NXS to a few others. Hmm...alpha level.
He also tested a V6, Swaro X5, Kahles, ATACR, and AMG.
Exactly...no TT, no Hensoldt, no S&B Polar, no Leica Magnus, no Swaro z8i, no Zeiss v8 or victory HT, no Minox zp5, etc. Seemed like a mid range glass test described as alpha.
You’re right. He didn’t do a review of every single “Alpha” level scope currently on the market.
I look forward to seeing that review whenever it happens..........
Oh, ok.
Maybe people have a different version of alpha. I've owned and currently ownquite a few of those scopes that you've mentioned. While I do agree that some are better than others, most of them compare nicely. I'd hardly call an ATACR, Swaro, or AMG mid range.
I guess I consider alpha the best of the best, absolute top tier...From what’s I’ve seen, I wouldn’t consider an ATACR 525 or an AMG top tier on glass quality, let alone a huskemaw or nxs. Never owned a March, can’t speak on those.
A Hensoldt 4-16x56 would fit the bill, about 31 ounces, ffp, superb illuminated reticle, absolutely no bleed you can find them used for less than 2 with the nh1 reticle, new reasonably priced because of the soaring trend towards higher mag.
Similar threads
