Re: what would you like to see?
KYS338
you are absolutely right that Remington 700 is sufficient, but in my opinion its not optimized.
The fact that its an open action that have pretty low stiffness and lacks an integral rail makes is less good for a long range gun.
In the 80th I was competing a lot with CG63 and CG80 competition rifles in Swedish high power rifle competitions, rifles built on mauser modell 96 actions. Some of those rifles really shoot insanely good, and there was almost never an issue with them.
But does that make them optimized for a long range gun in 2011?
Another funny comparision that can be made is Sako-Tikka.
They are made in the same factory.
Using same barrels, and same quality controll.
(I have been there)
Still T3 rifles shoots normally better than normal Sako hunting rifles (TRG not included in the comparision) and the fun thing is that the T3 plastic stock is everything else than impressive, and it's not bedded either. And the T3 is the budget gun while the Sako is the premium......
Still it outshoots many customguns........
Why? my guess would be that it's the stiffness in the action who makes a big part of the accuracy, and its not even bedded......
Back to the thread.
Optimized action for long range rifles are something stiff with integral rail (if not open sights should be used)
Surgeon is very optimized, really a great action.
Would really love one of those myself.
But if we are talking budget, the T3 is a very strong competitor.
I wouldent build anything such on an action that lacks integral rail, why should one, the integral rail systems are availble and there is no reason to go for less good when more good is avilble and actually not more expensive.
.
Håkan