Re: What's a good centerfire group?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: mnshortdraw</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I see it at the range too. Guys with 300wm, wsm's Weatherby's, 338's all these cannons for shooting deer at 50 yards. These guys show up a week before hunting season with a few boxes of whatever ammo is on sale with no regard to bullet weight or anything. Most of them have flimsy junk plastic stocks, and 7lb factory triggers that they just hammer on. Simmons, Tasco, and Bushnell banner scopes are commonplace. These guys mess around at the 100 yard range for about ten shots until they realize they will have to go to 50 to get it on paper. They get on paper with one shot, and adjust their scope. shoot another shot, adjust...... They leave after their forehead is bleeding and they are out of ammo. Last fall, shooting after my flight to verify my zero, I had do deal with that crowd. They were f'n amazed at my 3/4" groups. Damn weekend warriors with their garbage.</div></div>
I do know what you are talking about here, but not everyone is a paper shooter. I have seen guys that can't shoot a 2" group at 100 yards on paper make fantastic shots on game, and rarely if ever miss when shooting at fur. I'm not talking about shooting deer at 50 yards either. I'm talking about making 400 yard coyote shots while sitting on their asses and resting their elbows on their knees, or hitting a bounding mule deer that is at 700 yards while laying across their back pack.
I have also seen talented paper shooters absolutely start shaking when they see a medium sized deer and miss at 30 yards. I don't know how many times I have heard paper shooters say "I don't know how to shoot like that" when we hike up to a game animal and have a 200 yard chip shot with no available bench rest. My reply is always "did you want me to pack one in for you?".
There is a difference in being good on paper and good in real life (much respect to the ones that are good with the kind that shoot back), and I find very few who can do both.