Re: Who here has modified their AI magazines?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: thefitter</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: brasscow</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: thefitter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Yeah, I have seen these. I ordered a similar item from Midway that turned out to be crayola. I'm sending it back.
Now I think I'd rather try and modify one of the 3 that I already have.
</div></div>
Man would the anti-gunners be pissed if they knew crayola was making hi-cap magazines!
Just wanted to chime in and say that you may want to check the feed ramp on your action to see if that would require modification if you were to remove the front plate of the mag (i.e. bullet tip gets caught under ramp).
The alpha mags ARE gaining in popularity, but I've seen even the latest mags not function properly in a surgeon bottom metal. MOST guys have no problems with them, though. It would be nice to have a short 10rd mag like those. </div></div>
Sometimes I don't pay attention to the spell check.
I could understand feed problems if I was using longer rounds but I did not even get to those. And it never was the first round, and these rounds worked fine in a standard AI mag. </div></div>
Then why do you want to mod the mag?