XLR Stock over other brands

[jaym_100]

I don't know what kind of stock I want. I was going to go with the Mcmillian A-5A or Manners T-4A or T-5A. I have since discovered the XLR stock. I'm sure I'm not the first in this predicament. Can I hear why the XLR would be a better or worse choice over the others? The only stocks I have ever handled were the T-5A (never shot it) Mcmillian A-4 and HS precision 700p stock.

 

[mis-guided child2]

Re: XLR Stock over other brands

Well, its infinately adjustably to YOU.(within its parameters)
Its rock solid and well made.
Its moderately priced for what you get.
Accessories.
Its sexy as hell.

 

[Da-Law-Dawg]

Re: XLR Stock over other brands

jaym,

I have ran the Mc A3, 4 and 5's (currently running an A4 on my FN), along with the AICS 1.5 & 2.0. Never ran the Manners but got to fondle a few. I have also ran the HS 700P and LTR stocks. All are good pieces of kit.

I recently got my first XLR in for my .338LM and fell in love with it. I can't say enough for Kyle's service at XLR or the level of craftmanship in this platform.

Here's the reason(s) I went with the XLR for this project.....

1. Ergonomics- user adjustable across a wide range.
2. Integrated mag system- (AICS mags)
3. Ability to have either a fixed or folding platform
4. Weight- runs about a pound lighter than an AICS

As I stated above, there are multiple pros to the XLR system. No need for a seperate bottom metal and the AICS mags are widely available. Adjustability is great and allows a perfect fit to the shooter. Unlike the AICS, you can have it either folding or fixed and the end user can set it up however they want.

The only con that I saw with the platform was having to run a higher ring. Outside that, I can't and won't complain. I don't think you'd be disappointed if you pulled the trigger on one.

In short, a helluva piece of kit.

 

[HillbillyfromAL]

Re: XLR Stock over other brands

Also comaring prices might help you. I ordered the XLR and 3mags for less than an AICS is running at most places.

 

[Captramrod01]

Re: XLR Stock over other brands

Jaym if your considering going the full chassis route I would take a hard look at the Mcree system as well. I was in your spot about a month ago and don't regret my decision at all. After seeing how much the 'traditional' stocks cost with adjustable cheek pieces, LOP, bottom metal, and needing to get it pillar bedded after all that it makes the chassis systems look like a bargain. I'm sure the XLR is top notch as well, I just prefer the looks of the Mcree...plus Scott is a pleasure to deal with. Good luck with your decision!

 

[jaym_100]

Re: XLR Stock over other brands

I am going to go with the XLR. Now I need to know what size rings I need. I ordered the Seekins med rings and the new SS 5-20x50 scope. I am thinking I will need higher rings. Can someone help me with this. I have a TPS 20 MOA base if that matters. Also will the MTU contour barrel have any problem fitting this stock?

 

[rwest309]

Re: XLR Stock over other brands

I dont know about the rings but the mtu will be fine. I think the ID of the forend is like 1.5 IIRC

 

[ollie]

Re: XLR Stock over other brands

I am going to use riser blocks from yhm so that my burris xtr rings will work.

 

[jeo556]

Re: XLR Stock over other brands

Here is a link to the website that explains how to calculate minimum required righ height. Good luck and you'll love the chassis!

 

[GreatGonzo]

Re: XLR Stock over other brands

I have to run high rings (minimum) for any 50mm scope on my XLR. You can calculate what size rings you need pretty easily by figuring out what ring would put the bell of the scope directly on the rail. This will leave enough clearance for vibrations and torque of the stock (4-5 mm). Like my chassis a lot. Kyle was great to deal with. When you look at cost, its going to be hard to beat the XLR if you need the features that it offers.