I've been considering a Zeiss Conquest with their Reticle 43 mildot. I've read everything I can find on their website regarding the use of their Reticle 43, but I am left with even more questions.
From their website:
"<i>This reticle also gives you the option of estimating distances. The very fine central crosshairs carry a number of points, which lie exactly 10 cm apart at 100 m at 12 x magnification. The angle between the points is equal to 1 milliradian = 10 cm / 100 m.</i>"
This description specifies "<i>at 12 x magnification</i>," but for which model? Not all models go up to 12 power, and some go far above that. At what point between the top and bottom of the magnification range, in a given model, is their Reticle 43 most accurate for ranging purposes?
As far as I know, most SFP scopes with mildot (or other ranging-type reticles) from other manufacturers are only accurate at the highest magnification setting. Am I wrong? Is this also true of Zeiss riflescopes? I don't want to assume that it is and end up with the wrong scope.
Anyone out there have direct experience with Zeiss scopes in this regard?
From their website:
"<i>This reticle also gives you the option of estimating distances. The very fine central crosshairs carry a number of points, which lie exactly 10 cm apart at 100 m at 12 x magnification. The angle between the points is equal to 1 milliradian = 10 cm / 100 m.</i>"
This description specifies "<i>at 12 x magnification</i>," but for which model? Not all models go up to 12 power, and some go far above that. At what point between the top and bottom of the magnification range, in a given model, is their Reticle 43 most accurate for ranging purposes?
As far as I know, most SFP scopes with mildot (or other ranging-type reticles) from other manufacturers are only accurate at the highest magnification setting. Am I wrong? Is this also true of Zeiss riflescopes? I don't want to assume that it is and end up with the wrong scope.
Anyone out there have direct experience with Zeiss scopes in this regard?