Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A little JB Weld and it will be better than new!
"Warning! This factory will self-destruct in 30 seconds!"
"Warning! This factory will self-destruct in 30 seconds!"
Cool. Never heard of it before.That is why you use Fyrquel in high temperature hydraulic systems.
Almost all the the steam turbine power plants use it. The hydraulic actuators fire the stop and control valves would turn into flame throwers on a leak when the steam lines and turbine are 500+ degrees. It is nearly like brake fluid, it will remove paint from anything it touches and it's slick as hell.Cool. Never heard of it before.
"Warning! This factory will self-destruct in 30 seconds!"
This is what happens to a stock 5.0 block when exceeding 600 hp on a regular basis. All of a sudden you will have a loss of oil pressure with only the intake and oil pan holding the block together.
What browser are you using?What are all these post that say "watch on twitter"? I cant watch the video.
What is twitter?
No kidding; an old Glowie friend I used to shoot & blow up things with offered me one at 15K over 15 years ago - kicking myself I didn't get it then.That time is now gone forever…
Spineless, lazy mutherfuckers with no principles don't care. FIFY!Nobody cares. They make the best blades.
He was in charge of bringing shovels, rakes, and implements of destruction.....Late for the revival...
R
Those Gatling guns sure would have come in handy about 30 minutes ago..... Leave them in the fort..... They'll just slow us down....June 25, 1876
Battle of the Little Bighorn
Custer's Last Stand by Edgar Samuel Paxson
![]()
They didn't carry their sabres, either. Dunno how much that would've mattered, but if it came down to hand-to-hand I'd rather have a few feet of sharp steel than an empty carbine.Those Gatling guns sure would have come in handy about 30 minutes ago..... Leave them in the fort..... They'll just slow us down....
Not sure a Gatling Gun would have made a difference as both sides were intermingled according to passed down testimony of Indians. Repeating rifles and bows and arrows won the day for the Indians.They didn't carry their sabres, either. Dunno how much that would've mattered, but if it came down to hand-to-hand I'd rather have a few feet of sharp steel than an empty carbine.
The Gatling would definitely have made a difference once “the last stand” perimeter was created and the column collapsed into a fire sack.Not sure a Gatling Gun would have made a difference as both sides were intermingled according to passed down testimony of Indians. Repeating rifles and bows and arrows won the day for the Indians.
Sending troops into battle with single shot Springfield carbines against an enemy armed with Winchester Yellowboys and Henrys was stupid.
Not necessary at this point but outstanding none the less
I've yet to visit Little Bighorn but that is the no. 1 spot on my to do list. I may have to do it alone because my g/f asked "...Why?" and I'm not going to be rushed or put up with rolling eyes or the "I'll just wait in the truck" bullshit.The Gatling would definitely have made a difference once “the last stand” perimeter was created and the column collapsed into a fire sack.
But if you have never walked the battlefield, you don’t understand that it is not just a park with a smooth hill on it. All around are gully’s and streambeds and washes and high grass…. Perfect country for horses and cavalry. But very very bad for wheeled Gatling guns and the numerous limbers needed to feed them.
Little Bighorn Was not a planned battle for the Cavalry. They were in a patrol and a show of force and Custer intended to attack an encampment— an offensive deployment. Gatling guns were not offensive weapons. They were rampart and perimeter weapons. Cavalry technique was to ride in and form a skirmish line attacking the encampment or enemy force. Not set up Gatlings.
But, Custer became the defender after Reno stirred up the hornets nest. And Custer didn’t listen to his scouts about size of opposition or comprehend it their strong organization and motivation.
He has always been criticized for not bringing his Gatling guns. But a. It was not that kind of mission. b. Not only would they have slowed them down, they could not have maneuvered at all in that terrain. c. Custer failed at such an epic level that Gatlings were the least of his compounded errors.
The argument could probably have been made that if he brought them, be never would have ended up at Little Bighorn. Maybe true. But that is the thing about complex battle analysis. You can always find a couldda, wouldda, shouldsa and then pin the outcome on that. Trace the Butterfky effect back far enough and there is always some thing that folks pin the outcome on.
Actually, Custer screwups were mainly in his pre-battle Intel (he ignored it) and his assumptions about the enemy (size and capability and intentions). Once the battle started, he ran a fairly masterful defense.
The again, so did de Castries at Dien Bien Phu. And Heinriki and Student at Berlin. They just had no way to win against the numbers and force moving in on them.
But, yes, in the pocket defense at little big horn the Gatlings probably could have saved some troopers if they had enough ammo. But that like saying “If we had all our air cover up over Pearl Harbor, the Arizona would have been afloat today.” Yup. Probably. But that’s not how history rolled the dice that day.
Cheers, Sirhr
Ps. Go visit Little Bighorn. It is an amazing place in the middle of a lot of other amazing places!
A hybrid
Do you know how expensive a real pair of lederhosen are?
When you visit...I've yet to visit Little Bighorn but that is the no. 1 spot on my to do list. I may have to do it alone because my g/f asked "...Why?" and I'm not going to be rushed or put up with rolling eyes or the "I'll just wait in the truck" bullshit.
I've studied that battle for years, and am finally getting a grasp of it. I think Custer was self disillusioned about his inflated super powers ever since he routed the larger Confederate cavalry at Gettysburg, which in my opinion, may have helped win the battle. However, his big medicine didn't work on Sitting Bull and the other chiefs at Little Bighorn.
I've never seen a Gatling gun being used live but it always impressed me as an unwieldy, robotic weapon for one person to run. It was designed to work on a level battle field against a mass charge such as Picket's charge but not for pop up and disappear targets on hilly broken terrain such as Little Bighorn.
If Custer's men had full auto M4s, AKs, fighting shotguns and lots of ET-MPs to toss down the hill he may have stood a chance.
Had to dial 911.Fucker ran back and grabbed his phone...
Magnuflux it. Might not go all the way through, might still work.
Isn't it so warm and loving how father and son get along so well? Bet Father's Day in that household was something special.
Spineless, lazy mutherfuckers with no principles don't care. FIFY!
Allowing bullshit like this to stand is why companies think they can push all this woke bullshit down our throats.
You're wrong. Some care, and I wouldn't use their blades now even if they were free.
There wasnt much hand to hand unless one of the Native Americans was looking to make a name for himself in the pictogram record.They didn't carry their sabres, either. Dunno how much that would've mattered, but if it came down to hand-to-hand I'd rather have a few feet of sharp steel than an empty carbine.
Not sure a Gatling Gun would have made a difference as both sides were intermingled according to passed down testimony of Indians. Repeating rifles and bows and arrows won the day for the Indians.
Sending troops into battle with single shot Springfield carbines against an enemy armed with Winchester Yellowboys and Henrys was stupid.