They can't simply make "everywhere" a sensitive place. Nor can they use that distinction as a de facto ban. The ruling directly addresses that point.
The same applies for making the application process overbearing, including placing either extraordinary requirements or delaying the wait time. The ruling also alludes to this, and remarks there are currently ~40 states with "shall issue" processes which will serve as the basis for determining a reasonable process.
I see some jurisdictions are trying to stretch out the timeframes and quoting almost a year wait. That will be legally challenged, expedited and defeated.
YMMV