The ONLY feasible use of this kind of technology would be on generational starships, AKA "space arks", that travel at sub-light speed and carry thousands, and up to hundreds of thousands of colonists to a new habitable planet light years away. The conditions of life aboard such a ship may not be conducive to healthy pregnancies so having fetuses grow in an incubator while Mom and Dad continue to work at their assigned posts to keep the huge ship running would be a reasonable alternative. Or the parents may be in hibernation, on schedules which wake a portion of the crew to perform essential duties while the rest of the crew hibernates. In either case, having the baby outside of the womb and in a secure, hardened facility deep within the space ark's medical wing would make sense. With the exception of research involving consenting volunteers in preparation for such a space mission, there is no commercial use for this kind of tech here on Earth.
We are at a point in human technology and history where being forced to resettle on a distant world via a space ark may very well come to fruition in the next 100-300 years. Imagine one day the James Webb or another space based observatory just manages to detect an impending supernova with enough clarity to see that the axis of the dying star is pointed right at Earth, meaning the gamma ray burst from that supernova WILL be aimed at Earth once that star explodes, and this planet will not escape it. All life would be wiped out once that cosmic blast enters the solar system and hits us. However, the star will not go supernova at least for the next century, so humanity has roughly 100-130 years warning. In that 130 year time frame, a human race focused and clear on it's intentions, and the consequences of inaction and procrastination WILL be able to accomplish a lot to try to get as many people as possible off this world and safely onto another before the cosmic hammer strikes.