• Winner! Quick Shot Challenge: Caption This Sniper Fail Meme

    View thread

Scope and rings for Vudoo 360

Drifter-313

Private
Minuteman
Feb 21, 2023
10
2
Georgia
I finally talked myself into ordering a vudoo 360, ive got a few weeks to wait so im trying to figure out what I want for a scope and rings/mount i want. I'm thinking of going with the Zero compromise 5-27x56 for a scope. I ordered a 20-moa base on the vudoo. What spuhr mount or ARC rings would i need? im planning on shooting NRL22 and maybe some other ELR matches.
 
I think you may need to go with a Spuhr mount to get a little more angle than the 20 moa as ordered.
Not sure how the 1000yds comes into play but if you do some outlaw rimfire matches at 400yds + you will be dialing like your .308 at 1000 hence the need for more moa.
Lots more opportunities for rimfire competition showing up in Ga, enjoy.
 
I’m thinking 300-400 yards is going to be about as far as I shoot. I know there’s a bunch of different organizations like NRL22 and PRS. I’m still trying to find somewhere around here that does shoots. I’m used to playing with my Cz455 and 452’s and shooting out to 100 yards at the house so this is all new stuff to learn. So MOA and adjustable scopes is a whole new world.
 
I’m thinking 300-400 yards is going to be about as far as I shoot. I know there’s a bunch of different organizations like NRL22 and PRS. I’m still trying to find somewhere around here that does shoots. I’m used to playing with my Cz455 and 452’s and shooting out to 100 yards at the house so this is all new stuff to learn. So MOA and adjustable scopes is a whole new world.
What part of GA. and how much driving are you willing to do?
 
I already ordered it with the 20 Moa base. I’m thinking most shots will be in the 300 yard and less range. Not many spots in Georgia where you can see 1000 yards.

Call and tell them to put a 40 moa on it. Not that hard to change. If you are sticking with the ZCO then I'd get the ARC M Brace. You can add MOA is you wanted also even if you didn't want to call and have them change the base.


Also if you do plan to do ELR with it you might want to look at the Zeiss LRP S3 4-25 as it has 45 mils/160 moa of elevation. In shooting long with a .22 elevation is more important than the glass as you will be able to see the targets just fine with any decent glass and the Zeiss has better than decent glass. Will also save you about $2000 to buy ammo ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: SanPatHogger
I am ordering a a V22 360 with the 30 moa rail and I am going to put the ERA-Tac 0-70 moa adjustable mount on it. As for the glass I am thinking Zeiss LRP S3 6-36x56 32 mils of travel with parallax goes down to about 11 yards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rob01
Call and tell them to put a 40 moa on it. Not that hard to change. If you are sticking with the ZCO then I'd get the ARC M Brace. You can add MOA is you wanted also even if you didn't want to call and have them change the base.


Also if you do plan to do ELR with it you might want to look at the Zeiss LRP S3 4-25 as it has 45 mils/160 moa of elevation. In shooting long with a .22 elevation is more important than the glass as you will be able to see the targets just fine with any decent glass and the Zeiss has better than decent glass. Will also save you about $2000 to buy ammo ;)
I can call them and have them change to a 40 Moa if needed. I already had to call and change the trigger I ordered so I’m trying not to make too many changes. I ordered the 20 moa because I was unsure of the distance at most of the matches.
 
I am ordering a a V22 360 with the 30 moa rail and I am going to put the ERA-Tac 0-70 moa adjustable mount on it. As for the glass I am thinking Zeiss LRP S3 6-36x56 32 mils of travel with parallax goes down to about 11 yards.

I'll be throwing a Zeiss 6-36 on my Vudoo also. More than enough elevation for matches.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GIXXER2000
I can call them and have them change to a 40 Moa if needed. I already had to call and change the trigger I ordered so I’m trying not to make too many changes. I ordered the 20 moa because I was unsure of the distance at most of the matches.

You can stay with the 20 MOA if you want and then go with MOA in the mount. Just trying to help out. It's not a big deal for them to change a mount.

As for matches, there are some in Clinton SC on the PRS22 schedule for Atlantic Coast. Less than 2 hours from you. Nothing really close in NRLX but regular NRL matches might be in the area are close at Pinetucky.


 
You can stay with the 20 MOA if you want and then go with MOA in the mount. Just trying to help out. It's not a big deal for them to change a mount.

As for matches, there are some in Clinton SC on the PRS22 schedule for Atlantic Coast. Less than 2 hours from you. Nothing really close in NRLX but regular NRL matches might be in the area are close at Pinetucky.


Yeah I had just saw the NRL 22 matches at Pinetucky, that’s only a 30-45 min ride so that’s probably a good place to start.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rob01
Yup will get your feet wet and then you can drive up to Clinton to shoot a little farther in a match.

You still set on the ZCO?
 
Hard to beat a ZCO on a rimfire (or any gun for that matter). Ive owned them all and settled on a 5-27. The 4-20 would be a good option too with the bigger fov. I would stay away from the 8-40 due to having less elevation travel.
 
I’m not dead set on the ZCO, just heard a lot of good things about them. Are there other options I might need to take a second look at?

The ZCO is an excellent scope with great glass but I was just not wanting you to think you had to spend $4000 for a rimfire optic. If you have that disposable income and want it then get it but I am more of a budget minded shooter. The ZCO won't win you a match anymore than a less expensive scope so don't want you to think that also. I have used $700-3000 scopes on my Vudoos and have won matches with all of them. In rimfire being able to see to 400 yards is not hard. Important to have good tracking and enough elevation as well as a good reticle. I mentioned the Zeiss 4-25x50 above but the 6-36 would work too. A ton of good options out there now so just take a look around if you were stretching the budget to get the ZCO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cowpokey
The ZCO is an excellent scope with great glass but I was just not wanting you to think you had to spend $4000 for a rimfire optic. If you have that disposable income and want it then get it but I am more of a budget minded shooter. The ZCO won't win you a match anymore than a less expensive scope so don't want you to think that also. I have used $700-3000 scopes on my Vudoos and have won matches with all of them. In rimfire being able to see to 400 yards is not hard. Important to have good tracking and enough elevation as well as a good reticle. I mentioned the Zeiss 4-25x50 above but the 6-36 would work too. A ton of good options out there now so just take a look around if you were stretching the budget to get the ZCO.

Yeh I like me the solid Vortex Strike Eagle for the budget minded.
 
My thoughts
The ZCO is an excellent scope with great glass but I was just not wanting you to think you had to spend $4000 for a rimfire optic. If you have that disposable income and want it then get it but I am more of a budget minded shooter. The ZCO won't win you a match anymore than a less expensive scope so don't want you to think that also. I have used $700-3000 scopes on my Vudoos and have won matches with all of them. In rimfire being able to see to 400 yards is not hard. Important to have good tracking and enough elevation as well as a good reticle. I mentioned the Zeiss 4-25x50 above but the 6-36 would work too. A ton of good options out there now so just take a look around if you were stretching the budget to get the ZCO.
My thinking on this was if I’m gonna spend $3500 on a gun then it deserves some nice glass. ZCO just came up more when I was researching than most other brands. I’m open to any suggestions.
 
My thoughts

My thinking on this was if I’m gonna spend $3500 on a gun then it deserves some nice glass. ZCO just came up more when I was researching than most other brands. I’m open to any suggestions.

Sounds like you want a ZCO so get one as anything else you get you will feel like you missed out on something.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Cowpokey
Sounds like you want a ZCO so get one as anything else you get you will feel like you missed out on something.
Exactly this ^^^

Never compromise on getting "what I can afford now", you'll just end up longing for what you wanted all along...then spending the money on it later, which put you in a hole from the start.
 
Exactly this ^^^

Never compromise on getting "what I can afford now", you'll just end up longing for what you wanted all along...then spending the money on it later, which put you in a hole from the
im usually from the “Buy Once Cry Once” school of though but since it cost so much I’d rather someone convince me why not buy the zero compromise. I never thought I’d entertain spending that kind of money on a scope for a .22.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cowpokey
im usually from the “Buy Once Cry Once” school of though but since it cost so much I’d rather someone convince me why not buy the zero compromise. I never thought I’d entertain spending that kind of money on a scope for a .22.
I never thought I'd be able to justify (to myself) the cost of a Vudoo...but here we are, and I couldn't be happier.
 
I have 2 ZCOs, a Strike Eagle, an AMG, went through a Kahles DLR, and a Leupold 7-35.

I like the ZCOs reticle... the MPCT3X the most.

I dislike the 15mils per revolution on the turret because my vision is getting worse and it's harder to see the little hashes.

I like the thicker reticle lines in the ZCO because of the bad vision. Kahles DLR I had to be at nearly 18x to see the hashmarks. I can see the .2 hash marks at 12x on the ZCO.

I sometimes wish the ZCO did something like a 7-35 to get more magnification. The 8-40 would have been great if they didn't make everything else worse about the scope (larger, less travel, worse eye box).

The Leupold 7-35 PR2 reticle I like... except it was too thin and needed to be cranked up to 18x to see hashes comfortably. Also minimum parallax was like 50 or 75 which sucked on the 25 yd tiny targets.

If it's an infinite budget, which I kinda used to have, I chose the ZCO for what I liked most. I actually am probably going to drop another 4K on the ZCO with the 10mils per rev turrets this summer.

The other major purchase I want to do and am waiting for is Swarovski NL Pure Range Finder whenever they decide to make it... going from my Sig 3K binos to the Swaro binos is literally night and day...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Badjujuu
im usually from the “Buy Once Cry Once” school of though but since it cost so much I’d rather someone convince me why not buy the zero compromise. I never thought I’d entertain spending that kind of money on a scope for a .22.

When you get to about the $2000 mark you start getting a much smaller return for the extra money. You can spend twice as much and not gain twice as much in performance. I’m running a $1500 scope on my Vudoo now and it works great. No issues seeing targets at matches and plenty of elevation and a great reticle. I am going to be trying the Zeiss soon because I like to try different optics. Not because I think it will be any huge advantage over what I run now.

And again if you have a hard on for ZCO and nothing else will make you happy then get it. It’s a very nice optic. Your money to spend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cowpokey