Maggie’s Motivational Pic Thread v2.0 - - New Rules - See Post #1

Got the Mosin Nagant zeroed today. It's shooting a really good group for a 100 year old rifle. I had one flier, not bad for some rusty old Russian ammo.

1728699026593.png
 


Just to bring it back again

Bike riding asshole is forcing the car out of the lane of travel and going well under the speed limit. He was a hinderance to traffic and probably a cunt as well. If you are slower than traffic keep your faggot, panty wearing, asshole biker self to the side of the road, no matter what retarded shit you think you are not a fucking car.

And one last thing, stop fucking touching people's cars, what fucking planet do you live on? Keep your fucking hands to yourself. The asshole friend was filming you being a cunt, he needs his ass kicked as well.

Oh yeah......................................pics and shit
 

Attachments

  • Fragmentation Grenade.jpeg
    Fragmentation Grenade.jpeg
    39.1 KB · Views: 154


Just to bring it back again

Bikes in the road are annoying. That’s all there is to it….

The issue is, people don’t have the legal right to interfere with them while they’re on the road because that’s where they’re supposed to be. I’m pretty sure where I live, that person committed several particular crimes.

The first, of course, being that it doesn’t matter how you hit the person, you hit the person on a bike. Doesn’t matter if you’re right or wrong, now you got 12 points on your license, a suspended license for 1 to 5 years, and with the video, probably list of other charges.

…and, if you suffer from an attitude problem and don’t wait for the police, that’s a hit-and-run. Now you’re never seeing your drivers license again (5-10years).

All because you couldn’t play nice on the road…
 
Was that you on the bike or in the truck????
It really doesn’t matter… Regardless of who’s at fault the SUV hit the person. At that point it no longer matters who you think is at fault from a criminal standpoint.

Yeah, in a civil court for a lawsuit that’s a different story… but criminally, most motor vehicle laws in most states: The vehicle is at fault.
 
It really doesn’t matter… Regardless of who’s at fault the SUV hit the person. At that point it no longer matters who you think is at fault from a criminal standpoint.

Yeah, in a civil court for a lawsuit that’s a different story… but criminally, most motor vehicle laws in most states: The vehicle is at fault.

So if I pay for a licence, registration, insurance etc I am automatically at fault??

The guy who pays nothing automatically wins???
 
So if I pay for a licence, registration, insurance etc I am automatically at fault??

The guy who pays nothing automatically wins???
I didn't say it fair; Most states if you hit a pedestrian or a bike, you're screwed. Regardless of the circumstances.

My old man hit an old lady crossing the street in the middle of the night, wearing black, and killed her.

The law makes him at fault regardless... instant 10 points and there is no appealing it.

There were no road lights, he was coming around the corner while doing the speed limit. she was DRT. He's at fault legally.
 
View attachment 8521755

So....when did cameras in 1975 add the date of the photo to the negative? To be in color, that date stamp would have to be captured through the lens and onto the film (think of the wavelength of that color). My guess is it was a digital camera (with option to overlay date set to "on") with the date set wrong and the photographer and young lady were trying to recreate a "vintage" photo. The grainy-ness can be created/added by using a high ISO setting in a dark setting, like a garage...

Discuss.
They didn't make that Craftsman 6200 garage door opener until 2001. 🤡🤣
 
It really doesn’t matter… Regardless of who’s at fault the SUV hit the person. At that point it no longer matters who you think is at fault from a criminal standpoint.

Yeah, in a civil court for a lawsuit that’s a different story… but criminally, most motor vehicle laws in most states: The vehicle is at fault.
In NY a bicyclist is considered a vehicle and is subject to the same traffic laws, something that most of the spandex wearing
assholes cant seem to comprehend.
 
It really doesn’t matter… Regardless of who’s at fault the SUV hit the person. At that point it no longer matters who you think is at fault from a criminal standpoint.

Yeah, in a civil court for a lawsuit that’s a different story… but criminally, most motor vehicle laws in most states: The vehicle is at fault.
According to every level of collision investigation across the US....

Criminal proceedings against anyone involved in a vehicular collision go off of the "primary collision factor" or PCF. There could be multiple things that went wrong in a collision, but there's 1 involved party which did the *one thing* which, if not done, would have avoided the collision.

In this dick face bicyclists case... yes, the vehicle was crowding the bicycle father to the right, not cool, I get it...

.... then the bicyclist's inner 5 year-old came out and he drifted left (likely purposely) in front of that 5000-6000 pound vehicle way too close (potentially unsafe lane change and without proper signal). Then BikeDick (purposely?) slowed down to clearly an unsafe-for-given-conditions speed on a green light, causing the vehicle he cut off just a couple seconds earlier, to not have enough time or space to see/react to...thus the bicyclist is likely at fault based on my view of the incident.

Would a prosecutor bring charges if he was a most likely cause of his own demise? Doubt it, but crazier things have happened.
 
Last edited:
According to every level of collision investigation across the US....

Criminal proceedings against anyone involved in a vehicular collision go off of the "primary collision factor" or PCF. There could be multiple things that went wrong in a collision, but there's 1 involved party which did the *one thing* which, if not done, would have avoided the collision.

In this dick face bicyclists case... yes, the vehicle was crowding the bicycle father to the right, not cool, I get it...

.... then the bicyclist's inner 5 year-old came out and he drifted left (likely purposely) in front of that 5000-6000 point vehicle way too close (potentially unsafe lane change and without proper signal). Then BikeDick (purposely?) slowed down to clearly an unsafe-for-given-conditions speed on a green light, causing the vehicle he cut off just a couple seconds earlier, to not have enough time or space to see/react to...thus the bicyclist is likely at fault based on my view of the incident.

Would a prosecutor bring charges if he was a most likely cause of his own demise? Doubt it, but crazier things have happened.
I'm not arguing. You're correct. The big issue ends up being how most State's laws are structured. Especially in the Northeast where I grew up... Many of States, most, if a car hits a bicyclist... or, especially, a pedestrian, they get at least one ticket and it's got all of your points.
 
Last edited:
According to every level of collision investigation across the US....

Criminal proceedings against anyone involved in a vehicular collision go off of the "primary collision factor" or PCF. There could be multiple things that went wrong in a collision, but there's 1 involved party which did the *one thing* which, if not done, would have avoided the collision.

In this dick face bicyclists case... yes, the vehicle was crowding the bicycle father to the right, not cool, I get it...

.... then the bicyclist's inner 5 year-old came out and he drifted left (likely purposely) in front of that 5000-6000 point vehicle way too close (potentially unsafe lane change and without proper signal). Then BikeDick (purposely?) slowed down to clearly an unsafe-for-given-conditions speed on a green light, causing the vehicle he cut off just a couple seconds earlier, to not have enough time or space to see/react to...thus the bicyclist is likely at fault based on my view of the incident.

Would a prosecutor bring charges if he was a most likely cause of his own demise? Doubt it, but crazier things have happened.
Also if there's a vehicle left of suv cyclist is pushing driver into the other lane possibly causing more issues
 
  • Like
Reactions: clcustom1911
According to every level of collision investigation across the US....

Criminal proceedings against anyone involved in a vehicular collision go off of the "primary collision factor" or PCF. There could be multiple things that went wrong in a collision, but there's 1 involved party which did the *one thing* which, if not done, would have avoided the collision.

In this dick face bicyclists case... yes, the vehicle was crowding the bicycle father to the right, not cool, I get it...

.... then the bicyclist's inner 5 year-old came out and he drifted left (likely purposely) in front of that 5000-6000 point vehicle way too close (potentially unsafe lane change and without proper signal). Then BikeDick (purposely?) slowed down to clearly an unsafe-for-given-conditions speed on a green light, causing the vehicle he cut off just a couple seconds earlier, to not have enough time or space to see/react to...thus the bicyclist is likely at fault based on my view of the incident.

Would a prosecutor bring charges if he was a most likely cause of his own demise? Doubt it, but crazier things have happened.

The bicyclist should be charged with Darwinism in the second degree.