Also- not addressed, but what your God tells you is irrelevant to others.
That's not meant as an offense.
You shouldn't care what my God tells me, or what Vivek Ramamaamamla's Gods tell him.
That’s just ridiculous. If Vivek’s God(s) tells him we are all born to an immutable station in life, because of crimes in a past life, that belief is incompatible with my beliefs and values. Probably yours too. So too is it impossible to live in peace with someone’s craven images and false prophets that tell them to strike off my head and convert me by the sword. “Coexist” presupposes Judeo-Christian values that encourage peaceful interaction and coexistence. This cannot exist with any religion that proscribes punishment and death for apostacy or blasphemy, which precludes any sort of pluralistic society. These are literally dead end religions. It is really only the casual adherents who do not agree with or believe in the actual texts who are able to live among us and thrive peacefully. Any religion must be judged by the most zealous and ardent believers, because they are the ones truly following.
Christianity is foundational and baked in to our system of government not by direct quotation, but by fundamental premise. Even professed atheists like, Richard Dawkins, understand how intrinsic and fundamental Christian values are to all Western society even absent any belief and faith. Acknowledging that some religions and societies are incompatible with individual liberty and our way of life is not racism or prejudice. It's discernment of ideas and common sense, and it's that simple. To fail to understand them and project your own kumbaya proclivities (that you derive from Judeo-Christian values) is a dangerous enforced ignorance; just as projecting your own atheism and nihilism on all the believers in the world prevents you from understanding actual motivation and intent. You are left in perpetual darkness as to why people act the way they do, and why societies move in the direction that they do.
The codices, scriptures, creeds, and doctrines are ideas, and to pretend they are all the same or somehow equal is as idiotic as saying that all ideas are the same. While that may help you justify being spiritually dead and denying all reality but the single one we share, it's practical application is, again, enforced ignorance.
One of the best illustrations of this is the Christianization of Scandinavia. Their ancient Norse religion was basically one of woe and suffering with no way out except to die in battle. The only real believers in it were the Vikings and priests. This is basically what happens when the warriors are allowed to create the religion (sound familiar?). In a couple of hundred years the Old Norse Religion was dead without any conquest among the people, which is incredible and a testament to just how bad and empty it was for the vast majority of people who were primarily farmers and prolific traders for whom it promised nothing in this life or the next. As an example it does not stand alone, and in retrospect it did not survive because it was not totalitarian enough, and force submission enough for all the people for whom it only provided suffering (sound familiar?).
The Christian religion asks to you turn on your mind and open your heart. Not to turn it off and close it. This was a prior failing of the Catholic Church, and one they were able to correct, which is why they have prospered. It directs believers to turn outward, and look for truth. Not to turn inward and seek emptiness like Eastern Religions.
Faith and belief may seem incomprehensible to you, but it doesn't to the 87% of the earth's humans who do. I think the old saying that if you don't believe in something you'll fall for anything is accurate. Just don't forget that dismissing the unknown takes at least as much faith as acknowledging it, even though we do it so imperfectly.
And, Yea, MLKs associations with the communists was certainly a blot on his memory and the height of hypocrisy for a Baptist minister. That is the primary reason I qualified the quotes by pointing out that he was a sinner. That said, revolutionaries as well as governments often make poor choices and ally with bad people simply because they have common enemies. More often than not they come to regret it. Who isn't guilty of that? Still, the USSR and Stalin did the lions share to beat the Nazis. Then again, you probably think that was not a great victory for the good guys.