Just curious. We see all these "Feed the Hungry" campaigns on TV, which seem to raise millions & millions of $$$ for that effort. But how much of that money is actually getting to the Hungry, as opposed to being "skimmed off the top" by corrupt governments and, perhaps, even the charities, themselves? I'm betting that these charities are focusing on the "short term" solution (i.e. "just send $$$") as opposed to eliminating the problem "long term" by teaching the Hungry how to farm, raise animals, plant crops, etc. and become "self sustainable." This, because if they did provide a long term, permanent solution, the charity would be out of business quickly. There goes that revenue stream!
I'm a strong believer in the "teach them how to fish" philosophy, rather than just "catching fish" for them every day.
About 20 years ago I read an article about the US welfare system. Supposedly, about 10 percent makes to recipients and the other 90 supports the bureaucracy. In a third world country I suspect it’s not even close to 10 percent.