Accuracy International Picture Thread

IMG-4773.jpg


IMG-4779.jpg


IMG-4781.jpg
Putting the Arctic Warefare thread to shame. 🫡
 
  • Like
Reactions: taliv
Putting the Arctic Warefare thread to shame. 🫡
lol well 16* is Arctic as far as TN is concerned just like people in FL dress like eskimos when it gets under 50.

But I was surprised how easy it was to operate with ski gloves. I only had to take the glove off to take pics with the iPhone.

I left the gun and ammo outside most of yesterday and again last night just to test h1000 velocity. Going to chrono some more today
 
Looks like that French FRF2 with its integrated bipod for high/low angle shooting. More flexible use but less ultimate stability. I guess the AI shooters are French, so I suppose that bipod makes sense to them, like “doctrinally” or whatever.
View attachment 8624083
Loading the bipod would be somewhat difficult I would think
 
A little bit of short range fun (1423 yrds) with the 33xc barrel today.

Funny, I was just talking with another member here yesterday who also runs a 33XC barrel in his AXMC with a single shot sled, now thinking I need one as well. I already have a 300PRC barrel for my AXMC, and have been thinking about doing either 300 or 338 Norma but decided either of them wasn't enough of a performance increase over the 300PRC to justify purchasing the barrel/brass/mags. 33XC on the other hand seems to be a significant jump up in performance and looks worth the cost and effort. I know the 33XC will be single load only, but that's OK by me. How's it working for you?
 
Funny, I was just talking with another member here yesterday who also runs a 33XC barrel in his AXMC with a single shot sled, now thinking I need one as well. I already have a 300PRC barrel for my AXMC, and have been thinking about doing either 300 or 338 Norma but decided either of them wasn't enough of a performance increase over the 300PRC to justify purchasing the barrel/brass/mags. 33XC on the other hand seems to be a significant jump up in performance and looks worth the cost and effort. I know the 33XC will be single load only, but that's OK by me. How's it working for you?
Its a nice cartridge and I have had hits out to 2800 with it using 300gr smk's, I am not sure if I will continue since barrel life is relatively short as far as match accuracy goes. The barrel in the picture went south during last weekends match but it is still fun to play with out to around 1400. I now have my 300NM barrel back on and will use it for this season of matches. The 300NM rocks when using 245 bergers at 3050fps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huskydriver
Been playing with the Grey Ops 6GT AW mag in my AT-X. So far, I'm 50 for 50 without having a feeding issue...which is way better than what I was getting for reliability out of the two factory mags I've got. Still, 50 rounds isn't enough to brag about yet. However, it is making me like the 6GT again in my rifle.

I started to try to make another shitty video of my shooting over the course of the afternoon, but got tasked with 'honey dos' partway though. However, the wifey decided to hang out with me later on and do some shooting of her own with the rifle. She did great (about 1.25 MOA @ 650) considering the wind had picked up. I tried my best to call wind for her, but it was a constant shift between .4 right and .4 left mostly headwind.
20250222_143458.jpg


^ Don't be jealous of my impromptu spotter setup. 😆

Mirage sucked, but I got lucky with the first 5 rounds trying to remember my dial up.
20250222_132741.jpg


Then I tried 5 more after coming down a tenth. I missed a couple slight speed changes, and the target told me so. I have zero excuse...the mirage was potent today.

20250222_132811.jpg



I know this crap is heresy to the die-hards here, but the only guy I'm ever competing against these days is me.
 
That’s like, what, tree-fiddy total?

Proly closer to tree-fiddy-oh-oh🤣 Who makes a semi free free hate?

"The main challenge with PHOENIX-S was to engineer a solution that would prove robust and reliable when used with 0.338” and 0.5” Semi-Automatic and Bolt Action Weapons, along with ensuring boresight retention, and the ability to adapt the system for Extended Range Engagements (ERE) out past 2km. Extensive development work analysing high speed shock data captured from a range of weapon systems, coupled with proprietary shock analysis and modelling capability has resulted in a mechanical design construction that significantly reduces the amount of weapon shock that is transferred directly to the PHOENIX-S Thermal Core, Optics and Electronics. This in turn ensures that boresight retention is achieved, and overall system MTBF is improved over similar products using Cooled MWIR cores. The ERE capability is achieved by compensating the sight orientation via a simplistic control."
 
Last edited:
View attachment 8624067
Green Machine in use still? Frenchies trying to be poetic
1740348252055.png

Found on French Wikipedia under Groupe d'intervention de la Gendarmerie nationale - a counterterror unit within the Gendarmerie.

Looks to be the kind used in the photo shared by mr_fullmetal. I had heard of that bipod mount before but simply in passing. It looks to be different to the more common handstop with integrated bipod mount, with no rail at all on the forend.
 
Last edited:
OT but it’ll be quick.

Any of you dudes spin your Kestrel to help it reach air temp when shooting? Comment here.

MauryGold apparently thinks spinning is unneeded. I am but a simple farm boy and I spin. But I am curious as to what others do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: diggler1833
View attachment 8624927
Found on French Wikipedia under Groupe d'intervention de la Gendarmerie nationale - looks like a counterterror unit within the Gendarmerie.

The PH Spigot bipod as shown could be fitted into the original Hand Stop for high angle shooting. Asked for by SBS / SAS when they developed the L96 for Airliner operations in the Counter Terrorism Role.

It looks like they have removed the sling swivel from it though.
 
The PH Spigot bipod as shown could be fitted into the original Hand Stop for high angle shooting. Asked for by SBS / SAS when they developed the L96 for Airliner operations in the Counter Terrorism Role.

It looks like they have removed the sling swivel from it though.
The handstop with integrated bipod mount is slightly different. I think this is a unique block that is welded onto the chassis in lieu of the plastic block that forms part of the stocksides.

The PH bipod and AI’s own mount design were only adopted with the introduction of the AW so not sure about your SAS/SBS connection, but I may be wrong.
 
Anyone have any pics of an AXSR with an 18" barrel, or does it have to be 18.5" to clear handguard??

My old AXSR with an 18.5" proof barrel. I'd imagine an 18" might work with the right suppressor + mount combo. In the example below, the AAC TiTan shrouds over the brake/collar pretty well so there isn't a lot of exposed muzzle device.

1740417256210.png
 
Last edited:
Please pardon this moment of self-indulgence:

You know how there's always that one guy who corrects someone when they say "My rifle is a 0.XX MOA rifle", by saying:

"Oh yeah? So you're telling me that you shot at least 5 (and more appropriately 10) 5-shot groups and averaged them out to be 0.XX MOA? I doubt you did. I bet more likely than not, you shot one group that was 0.XX MOA and declared -against every statistical "law" in existence- that that was your rifle's actual capability."

Yeah, I'M THAT GUY. IT'S ME! I hate it when people claim accuracy based on one (or less than 5) groups. The only thing worse is when people claim that 3 shot "groups" count. They do not.

With that said . . . . I shot the best 1,000 yard group of my life yesterday. Unfortunately, it was on steel and not paper (which is another grounds for disqualification when declaring accuracy capability). But it (again, 5 shots) measured 1-13/16" inches. I followed it up (with a 20 minute range break in-between) with another group where the first four shots were within 3.6" (0.34 MOA), but the 5th frustratingly ended another 2.5" up (being frustrated with a 0.573 MOA group at 1,000 is pretty great).

I forgot to take phot of the rifle, but it's my AXSA with its "practice" (not even the "good" one) 6.5CM Barrel. 140 Berger Hybrids in Lapua Brass (about the 16th firing on the brass), 43.2gr H4350 (velocity 2787 fps) . CCI BR4 Primers. S&B PMII (the "de-milled military 5-25 version). Elite Iron BiPod. TBAC Ultra 9 (6.5).

It doesn't look like 5 shots, but it is.


IMG_8416.jpeg


IMG_8414.jpeg


Numbered (in no particular order)

IMG_8414.jpeg


Follow up group first four out of five shots:

IMG_8415.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Please pardon this moment of self-indulgence:

You know how there's always that one guy who corrects someone when they say "My rifle is a 0.XX MOA rifle", by saying:

"Oh yeah? So you're telling me that you shot at least 5 (and more appropriately 10) 5-shot groups and averaged them out to be 0.XX MOA? I doubt you did. I bet more likely than not, you shot one group that was 0.XX MOA and declared -against every statistical "law" in existence- that that was your rifle's actual capability."

Yeah, I'M THAT GUY. IT'S ME! I hate it when people do that. The only thing worse is when people claim that 3 shot "groups" count. They do not.

With that said . . . . I shot the best 1,000 yard group of my life yesterday. Unfortunately, it was on steel and not paper (which is another grounds for disqualification when declaring accuracy capability). But it (again, 5 shots) measured 1-13/16" inches. I followed it up (with a 20 minute range break in-between) with another group where the first four shots were within 3.6" (0.34 MOA), but the 5th frustratingly ended another 2.5" up (being frustrated with a 0.573 MOA group at 1,000 is pretty great).

I forgot to take phot of the rifle, but it's my AXSA with its "practice" (not even the "good" one) 6.5CM Barrel. 140 Berger Hybrids in Lapua Brass (about the 16th firing on the brass), 43.2gr H4350 (velocity 2787 fps) . CCI BR4 Primers. S&B PMII (the "de-milled military 5-25 version). Elite Iron BiPod. TBAC Ultra 9 (6.5).

It doesn't look like 5 shots, but it is.


View attachment 8625525

View attachment 8625526

Follow up group first four out of five shots:

View attachment 8625527
But did you do it 5 times?



Pathetic....