Run Federal 168 or 175gr SMKs or TMKs, and you'll be doing great.I
I've got a 16" 1:12 LW on the way.
Thanks for the confidence boost....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We'll be announcing the winner early next week, keep an eye out!
See the contestRun Federal 168 or 175gr SMKs or TMKs, and you'll be doing great.I
I've got a 16" 1:12 LW on the way.
Thanks for the confidence boost....
168gr SMKs is where I was going to start.Run Federal 168 or 175gr SMKs or TMKs, and you'll be doing great.
I wouldn't unless you're staying 700(ish) and in.168gr SMKs is where I was going to start.
I run 178 ELDX handloads at 2605 in the exact same barrel. Only have shot to 800 as it spends its whole life shooting deer inside 600 yards. But it’s a hammer with those
100 yards - 3 shot groups
View attachment 8639052
440 yards- 3 shots
View attachment 8639053
I’ve read this a lot about the 168 SMK, I figured for a 16” barrel I’m not likely to be shooting past 600yards very often, which should keep the 168 out of the transonic zone. I’m guessing a 1:12 twist 16” barrel will struggle to stabilise the sleeker bullets, but the 168 SMKs should be a safe starting point.I wouldn't unless you're staying 700(ish) and in.
"The 168gr SMK out of a .308 is usually considered a 7-800yd bullet tops due to the instability during transonic and then subsonic speeds. There have been shots made longer but overall reliability for making longer distance hits goes way down after that 7-800yd range when compared to other available bullets." I pulled that from this website, but the same.exact.thing was told to me (by someone who is not new) very, very early on.
My .308 barrel is 1/10, but 150 Scenars are amazing to 1,000, but don't handle the transonic range (past 1,000) nearly as well as 175SMKs, but the 175SMKs don't do *quite* as well to 1,000.
That said, I love the 175smk, and IIRC it was designed for the 1/12 barrels (check me on that, but that's what I seem to recall).
TL/DR: Avoid 168SMKs unless you're only shooting to 600. 175SMKs are great and so are 150 scenars.
What do you consider average velocity?However, it loves the 175s at average velocity.
It depends on the length of the round. Run everything through the Applied Ballistics app to check bullet stability factor. There is a very real relationship between bullet velocity, bullet length, and bullet spin.168gr SMKs is where I was going to start.
Have you tried 168gr ELD-Ms?
I was hoping they would go ok, but good to know the TMKs work.
This response is too generalized and doesn't account for how significant a 1:12 twist rotation will have a on a projectile.I wouldn't unless you're staying 700(ish) and in.
"The 168gr SMK out of a .308 is usually considered a 7-800yd bullet tops due to the instability during transonic and then subsonic speeds. There have been shots made longer but overall reliability for making longer distance hits goes way down after that 7-800yd range when compared to other available bullets." I pulled that from this website, but the same.exact.thing was told to me (by someone who is not new) very, very early on.
My .308 barrel is 1/10, but 150 Scenars are amazing to 1,000, but don't handle the transonic range (past 1,000) nearly as well as 175SMKs, but the 175SMKs don't do *quite* as well to 1,000.
That said, I love the 175smk, and IIRC it was designed for the 1/12 barrels (check me on that, but that's what I seem to recall).
TL/DR: Avoid 168SMKs unless you're only shooting to 600. 175SMKs are great and so are 150 scenars.
What do you consider average velocity?
I think all AI LW 308 barrels were 1:12 twist.I can check at some point. Was told it was 1:12 but haven’t ran a rod through it
It’s a LW 20” 7.62 X 51. Were there some 1:10 barrels in LW? I know the bartleins are 1:10
View attachment 8639138
Try the Federal 168 grain Tactical Tip, it is so much better past 600 yards than the 168 grain SMK.I wouldn't unless you're staying 700(ish) and in.
"The 168gr SMK out of a .308 is usually considered a 7-800yd bullet tops due to the instability during transonic and then subsonic speeds. There have been shots made longer but overall reliability for making longer distance hits goes way down after that 7-800yd range when compared to other available bullets." I pulled that from this website, but the same.exact.thing was told to me (by someone who is not new) very, very early on.
My .308 barrel is 1/10, but 150 Scenars are amazing to 1,000, but don't handle the transonic range (past 1,000) nearly as well as 175SMKs, but the 175SMKs don't do *quite* as well to 1,000.
That said, I love the 175smk, and IIRC it was designed for the 1/12 barrels (check me on that, but that's what I seem to recall).
TL/DR: Avoid 168SMKs unless you're only shooting to 600. 175SMKs are great and so are 150 scenars.
Right I thought so as wellI think all AI LW 308 barrels were 1:12 twist.
A 1:12 twist will exacerbate, not minimize the problem with the 168SMK (vs 1:10 or faster).This response is too generalized and doesn't account for how significant a 1:12 twist rotation will have a on a projectile.
Furthermore, 168gr TMKs and ELDs work just fine past 1000 yards.*
* At the right altitude, at the correct barometric pressure, with the right twist rate, bullet length, and velocity, which includes accounting for the barrel length.
Unless you go out and test with those factors in mind, it is speculation to say that a 168gr SMK won't reach past 600 yards, let alone 800 or 1000.
I ran my original LW 1:12 twist for a long time. It was stellar with 175 grain SMKs. In some respects, I am sorry I sold it.To add some fuel to this fire i run 175 RDFs (1.33" long) through a 25" 1:12" barrel perfectly fine. In total I've probably run at least 1500-2000 of them through that barrel. Results have been 1/2 moa and often better. 3/5 on moa steel at 1000yrds the last match i ran it in. Wind is what got me on the 2 misses. RDFs are running 2700.
I don't pay much attention to the thermal optics market, so I believed him. Congrats, you got me.Burris Super Thermal XJS
I hope that it is worth the money. It is 3X the cost of the Trijicon UTC Xii
I had a once in a lifetime opportunity to get an MWIR ELR clip-on or buy a new truck. Trucks are always available, so I chose differently.Ballpark $?
View attachment 8639647
AT-XC 6mmC is my first AI and wow, it just stacks right out of the box. Seems to really like 109 LRHTs with 42.0gr of N160
Again, it isn't just about the bullet weight, but the bullet length as well that matters.Sorry to take the topic back to barrel twists.
Had some free time at work so decided to make a table for the bullet stability for ELD-M, SMK and TMK bullets.
Good news is that even at low speeds (2400fps like you might see in a short barrel) most projectiles are at least somewhat stable, but do definitely need to choose wisely if you want a fully stabilized projectile in a 1:12 twist barrel.
I then took the worst bullet I'd looked at (175gr TMK) and compared to a 1:10 and 1:11 twist.
Basically at any realistic velocity you are fine with a 1:11 twist or faster, obviously the heavier projectiles (180gr+) start becoming and issue but I had to stop somewhere. Maybe if I'm bored at work again I'll add more projectiles and twists.
TLDR is, don't buy a 1:12 twist barrel if you can help it.
1/2” easy - 10 rounds all touching was the best so far.
109 LRHT
42gr N160
Alpha SRP Brass
CCI 450
2.84” COAL
2966 fps avg
As much as I like 6mmC, I hope to be able to get a 6.5x47L barrel at some point instead.
I just confirmed 100% it’s a 1:12. Has shot many groups under 1/2 moa. Always a hammer and always holds zero. Going on year 5 with my babyAgain, it isn't just about the bullet weight, but the bullet length as well that matters.
Plenty of folks ran the M40, M40A1, M40A3 and M40A5 out past 1000 yards just fine, which has a 1:12 twist barrel, and ran M118LR rounds, essentially Federal GMM SMK 175gr. I did reach out to a sniper instructor peer who has combat experience with the M40 rifles, who confirmed the distance and capability for me.
We also have @FUNCTIONAL with very direct experience running the M40. Sorry to call you out but it's important. Hell I want to share more of that shot data just as a solid reference...
There's no reason why the 1:12 Lothar Walther barrels aren't extremely capable. But, the right round needs to be chosen for it.
And so this circles right back to why I made my original post sharing the shot group: the Sierra 168gr TMK round with it's improved 9° boat tail seems to work best in this barrel, which I've so far tested in 20", and I have no doubt will perform equally well in my 24". My next range day I hope to get 300 round shot groups, and later, 700 round shot groups depending on wind.
I'll share all the images and data I have on this round. For us Yankees, the Federal GMM SMK 168gr & 175gr, and the Federal LE T308T 168gr, seem to be the most effective and cost conscious round to use in these barrels.
I don't have experience with Lapua or Berger rounds in these calibers, so I leave it to others to comment on what else shoots well. I invite it as this data is important for folks like us to have.
And yes, I read every single post in this forum regarding the Arctic Warfare and AT308 looking for ballistic data of factory rounds, and found excruciatingly little.
I hope the attached data helps for context. And I have much more data that shows how the length of Hornady rounds do not stabilize. I also tried the stability factor with a Berger 185gr round without success, but I'd entertain actually shooting it to see how it performs.
I don't understand how @hafejd30 is shooting 178gr ELD-X rounds. As far as I'm concerned, he's committing voodoo witchcraft as everything I have says that round should shoot like shit in a 1:12 barrel. But he's doing something right with his hand loads.
View attachment 8639867
Shot data simulates shooting in early March at Cameo Shooting Complex in Palisades, CO. USA
View attachment 8639868
View attachment 8639869
And my groupings again with the T308T 168gr TMK for good measure so everything is in one place:
View attachment 8639871
My AT shot Hornady factory 175s 4in at 100yd.... I've never had ANY factory Hornady shoot well in my rifles. I did have one .6MOA 10-shot group at 600 with my 175SMK handloads so I seem to echo your experience.Mine HATES the Hornady bullets.
I'm talking popping primers at starting loads hate for the Hornady bullets.
However, it loves the 175s at average velocity.
Since when?This is an old photo. I don't think this was the day that it happened, but I have definitely shot the silencer cover (seen on other bench) off the rifle. It is generally recommended to not do that.
View attachment 8640273
"You vs the guy she tells you not to worry about"
That's a lot of butt spacers... 60mm?Got the new skins and thumbscrews on the AT today
View attachment 8641062
A decent couple if I do say so myself
View attachment 8641063View attachment 8641064
Yup!That's a lot of butt spacers... 60mm?
Yup!
It’s funny. Anytime I post a pic .... first comments I get are the spacers on the butt...
Shoot it I had known you needed skins I had them somewhere for the AT I sold you homieGot the new skins and thumbscrews on the AT today
View attachment 8641062
A decent couple if I do say so myself
View attachment 8641063View attachment 8641064
Haha hang onto them babies. You’ll need them when you buy your next ATShoot it I had known you needed skins I had them somewhere for the AT I sold you homie
Well, at least you didn’t post pics of your well-groomed butt, or the lawn in your gun room.Yup!
It’s funny. Anytime I post a pic in my gun room or my yard the first comments I get are the spacers on the butt or my well groomed lawn![]()