Finally going after the most dangerous criminals- Special Olympians !

[nagantguy]

Their handicap, training regimen and the glory of winning a medal in international competition no longer excuses their rampant violent criminal behavior.

Walking at night - sober and not wanting to talk to strangers - fucking asshole finally got knocked down and arrested

 

[nagantguy]

He was handicapped and scared and had committed no crime - he’s lucky he survived the encounter.
Thank God he wasn’t walking his dog

 

[nagantguy]

And the “supervisor” saying we are going to give you a citation for “something “ and hopefully you can work it out .

The thing that got him assaulted and cuffed wasn’t a crime but they had to issue him a ticket for something to cover their blue brothers back . Well I guess the guy did have some “suspicious” cash in his pocket.

At the end I counted 4 cops- and the Special Olympia still had the higher combined IQ by a magnitude of 10.

 

[Safetyoff700]

Whew. Good thing everyone made it out alive.

They should pay him. Good job to the real heroes here on the internet.

 

[nagantguy]

No no no all credit goes to the brave men who beat up and rob the mentally and physically handicapped to ensure we are safe - the real heroes.
Imagine the damage he could have done walking around sober with suspicious cash in his pocket .

 

[Safetyoff700]

You are too humble. It must be hard to be that humble and so right ALL the time. Brave too. So brave. The bravest, Most humble internet armchair cop warrior.

I just don’t know how you do it buddy.

 

[LMTMWS]

You are too humble. It must be hard to be that humble and so right ALL the time. Brave too. So brave. The bravest, Most humble internet armchair cop warrior.

I just don’t know how you do it buddy.

Post how he is wrong in this assessment, or just do the ad hominem, the favorite argument of the toddler..akin to "you're a poopy pants" and make yourself irrelevant.

 

[Safetyoff700]

Post how he is wrong in this assessment, or just do the ad hominem, the favorite argument of the toddler..akin to "you're a poopy pants" and make yourself irrelevant.

Okay. You’re a poopy pants. (A GHeY one)

Never said her assessment was wrong. I quite often agree with her assessment, but have always maintained it’s simply chicken shit to play armchair cop EVERY Day.

Having said that. These cops are also chicken shit, but they will only be chicken shit in the posted video, unlike other habitual chicken shits who get a Hard-on while critiquing other chicken shits, but I digress lest I give these chicken shits the opportunity to attempt a redirect of the chickenshitery and claim hypocrisy in protest as afore mentioned chicken shits would undoubtedly be all to obliged to attempt.


Poopy pants

 

[LMTMWS]

Okay. You’re a poopy pants. (A GHeY one)

Never said her assessment was wrong. I quite often agree with her assessment, but have always maintained it’s simply chicken shit to play armchair cop EVERY Day.

Having said that. These cops are also chicken shit, but they will only be chicken shit in the posted video, unlike other habitual chicken shits who get a Hard-on while critiquing other chicken shits, but I digress lest I give these chicken shits the opportunity to attempt a redirect of the chickenshitery and claim hypocrisy in protest as afore mentioned chicken shits would undoubtedly be all to obliged to attempt.


Poopy pants

Your Boolean logic based assessment is that if someone continually criticizes a group of people when they do illegal and immoral acts, then that someone is a chicken shit? Interesting...So if someone does not continue to criticize a group when they do illegal and immoral acts, then they are not a chicken shit? Does that then mean you should not criticize illegal and immoral acts, or that doing it only on occasion makes you brave/not a chicken shit?