• 1 WEEK LEFT: This Target Haunts Me Contest

    Tell us about the one that got away, the flier that ruined your group, the zero that drifted, the shot you still see when you close your eyes. Winner will receive a free scope!

    Join contest

Magpul - 2025 New Maztech X4-FCS & X4-LRF

Yeah that's my one gripe, taller turreted scopes will prevent usage of the remote, unless you really mount the lrf forward on the diving board, a 90° would be the perfect solution, it allows use with scope like yhe TT or NF with beast turrett and also gets the wire out of the way so its not a hindrance when dialing.
 
Their working on a wireless remote option. It will use encrypted UWB not Bluetooth.
Biggest downside of the Impact (aside from not working when it's mildly chilly outside lol) is a wireless remote. My favorite thing is to spend whole nights wondering around in the dark constantly checking to see if I lost my switch (I haven't lost one yet, but the fear is always there).
 
Biggest downside of the Impact (aside from not working when it's mildly chilly outside lol) is a wireless remote. My favorite thing is to spend whole nights wondering around in the dark constantly checking to see if I lost my switch (I haven't lost one yet, but the fear is always there).
Agreed, I will always prefer a wired remote but it is nice that Maztech will give users the choice. Now if I can run a wired and wireless remote at the same time that would be awesome. I would put the wireless one on the buttstock to use with my support hand.
 
  • Love
Reactions: CrazyDoc
Agreed, I will always prefer a wired remote but it is nice that Maztech will give users the choice. Now if I can run a wired and wireless remote at the same time that would be awesome. I would put the wireless one on the buttstock to use with my support hand.
I'd be down for that. But I absolutely want wired over BT or any other wireless option first. Connector wise, with enough "want" you can have the connector at whatever position you want. Hell we have someone here who makes switches with different connectors.
 
What's everyone using for scope/mount options on this thing?
I'm ready to pull the trigger on a 15k but I'm worried about turret access.
Right now I'm running a zco/spuhr combo.
 
IMG_5131.jpeg

IMG_5101.jpeg




Don’t forget to ordered the $200 diving board
And $100 thermal riser (not the one pictured )
And the $175 cable
 
  • Like
Reactions: Evolution 9
Thanks @BurtG that mf’er is huge. I don’t have a mission for it so this kinda solidifies that I’m going to sit on the sideline for a bit. The mars profile is nicer but I don’t need 2 of them.
It’s honestly massive. Neither the NF or Area419 diving board are long enough for the remote plug to clear the turret on a NF 7-35.
 
it works fine the NF diving board with a 7-35 with the beast turret, the cable bends so it will insert into the port just fine and not mess with anything structurally.
 
In case this helps anyone, works fine with the following:

- NF 2.5-20x50 with Badger Condition 1 mount and Badger CLIF diving board

- ZCO 5-27x56 in ZCO block mount and one piece pic rail diving board

- ZCO 8-40x56 in ZCO rings and ZCO top cap with long pic rail diving board

- S&B 4-16x42 in Seekins rings and Vortex/Seekins diving board
 
Same with A419 diving board and Theta.
It mounts just fine. I can plug the cable in without an issue, but it sits right in the way of the elevation turret for me. The diving board needs to be longer or taller or something. Or, ideally, they would have a 90* plug. This is on an Area 419 mount/diving board.

IMG_1738.jpeg
 
It mounts just fine. I can plug the cable in without an issue, but it sits right in the way of the elevation turret for me. The diving board needs to be longer or taller or something. Or, ideally, they would have a 90* plug. This is on an Area 419 mount/diving board.

View attachment 8731794
Clearance on the Theta turrets is worse with the tail of the plug making contact.
 
Can you move the scope in the mount to help clear it better?
Maybe a little bit, but not that much. Seems like only realistic way of doing it would be to get the rings instead of the one piece mount to try and get some more space. Even then, I'm not sure it will be enough space to fully clear the turret.
IMG_1737.jpeg
 
Is the elevation and windage adjustment different in feel for you guy's units? Ive had a 2k and kept a 15k. I think both had tacticle elevation adjustment, but the windage adjustment was very mushy.
 
I got my 15k today and zeroed it in the backyard at 25 since that's all the space I have here. The 15k returns ranges extremely quickly and I was able to hit a radio tower about 5500y out easily. Don't have anything further that's visible so will need to see how far out it can go another time but it's a really solid laser.

I like how there are separate ammo and gun profiles. App and menu is very well thought out.

1754010640255.png
 
Last edited:
View attachment 8738559

Need to proof it on steel but seems pretty BA

Not sure why both the LRF and FCs have gun profiles , maybe you can use a non ab RF to feed the fcs in the future
Anderson.....seriously? You of all people burt...
download.gif
 
View attachment 8738559

Need to proof it on steel but seems pretty BA

Not sure why both the LRF and FCs have gun profiles , maybe you can use a non ab RF to feed the fcs in the future

It's actually very handy for some applications..... you can load one set of data in the LRF and another set of data in the FCS. Say subs and supers for 300blk.

I tried to demonstrate the concept in this video but there are several other use cases for this once you get creative enough.

ETA I see your setup is actually on a 300blk so you have the perfect setup for this.

 
How so apart from cost to performance? I thought everyone was pretty happy with their MARS?

Cost to performance is exactly what I'm referring to here.... To be fair, I don't claim to be a Mars expert as I've never felt like a $10k+ rangefinder made sense for me so not something I've spent time researching. My only experience with them is being around guys running them in matches.

So with that in mind, I'm genuinely curious what the additional cost of the mars and other similarly priced units actually benefit a shooter over the Maztech (IR illum could be one thing)?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rlsmith1
Cost to performance is exactly what I'm referring to here.... To be fair, I don't claim to be a Mars expert as I've never felt like a $10k+ rangefinder made sense for me so not something I've spent time researching. My only experience with them is being around guys running them in matches.

So with that in mind, I'm genuinely curious what the additional cost of the mars and other similarly priced units actually benefit a shooter over the Maztech (IR illum could be one thing)?
Gotcha, I think it's one of those pay twice the price for a 30% weight reduction scenario. I didn't love the weight or bulk of my Impact 4000, weight might have been fine if it hadn't been so big. Weight is easy to deal with for the price and 15k laser though I'm sure!