Someone murdered Charlie Kirk

One of the most disgusting bits of gaslighting I have seen from this whole affair has been the media and the social media sphere’s endlessly posting that this is just like the Republican Maga type who attacked Paul Pelosi in his house.

I’d have to dig up the thread here, but it was pretty obvious that the whole narrative was made up and that the so-called mega attacker was a male prostitute/drug addict invited into the home, but that The Pelosi name and family had to be protected at all costs.

But tens of millions of brainwashed little adult zealots have been led to believe that January 6 and Paul Pelosi were both giant insurrection attacks, when they were neither.

What happened to Charlie Kirk yesterday is a direct example of what happens when people are brainwashed and gaslighted into thinking they need to become violent warriors of “democracy.”

It also continues, and it seems like every time some incident happens a half dozen new yellow stripers show up here with no background, pushing a gaslight narrative. Almost as if they were organized and part of a planned response.

Good thing our glow radar is pretty well tuned.

Sirhr

Yeah it’s pretty obvious when the Democrat pops up in here. It’ll be a one month old account doing a whole bunch of liberal talking points lol. Fucking trash.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vh20
Not worth my effort when the "strongest" response I'll get is weakshit like being called a nigger 🤡


Bingo. We are in a class war and the only sides are us poor, common folk and the ruling elite. The sooner we realize this, the sooner we can actually take back this country. By the people for the people. Like Terry alluded to in the early pages of this thread, all the kikes in DC are gleefully watching the masses go at each other's throats over this assassination (regardless of who was behind it). As long as we attack each other, they remain safe. If they can turn us against each other this easily, they won't need to lift a finger to control us.
There you go! Resort to racist, idiotic talk.
 
LOvgTocdX8rR.jpeg
 
I watched the video once. I will not watch it again.
Very clearly the sonic crack of high velocity CF rifle cartridge. Impact clearly heard as well.
No boom.
I have worked the pits enough to be very familiar with this phenomenon. The "boom" did not follow. A supressor was used.
Guy standing next to Charlie, immediately claims he was the shooter. They later arrest a guy with a suppressed air rifle near the venue.
All distractions.

Church last night was very subdued. Lots of young folk go to my church. Some were in tears over this.
In many ways Charlie Kirk was our voice.
Now some of you will shit on his grave and his sacrifice. Yes, he made the ultimate sacrifice. He has made the statement numerpus times, that he is not afraid of the death threats. He said numerous times he has a home in heaven if they killed him.
How many of you have that kind of assurance?

The civil war talk....geez louweez. Who even said they want a civil war...i must have missed it.
If we decent folk(yeah the rest of you are absolute shitbags) wanted a civil war there would be bullets flying from oir side. The fact that we are trying to talk our way back to sanity, proves that we do NOT want a civil war.
As has been said, we don't have to want one, we already have one. The shitbags in our society are foaming at the mouth, not us.
We are having prayer meetings and encouraging patience.
The cartridge box is coming, and none of us are excited about it, or eager for it, that is insanity....like the shitbags.

Well said.
 
Trump in Butler was a coordinated event with the retard they used as the shooter allowed in place and several spotters to verify the shot in place in the crowd. And then the shooter was promptly murdered and had all details of his life purged. Probably not a huge selling point to would be assassians. So they have to offer at least a chance to escape now.

The Charlie Kirk shooting appears to be a coordinated group of people as well. Timed to work off of a violent tranny question with a spotter and two or three dupes to distract law enforcement in the early stages.

Trump golf course shooter was in place for hours. Zero security patrols spotted him and he had cellphones to contact dozens of people.

Was CNN covering Charlie Kirk live yesterday? Who filmed the shooting and how quickly did they get it online? Uploaded to where first?

Suddenly we have high-powered rifles being the weapon of choice for political killings. These shots are not particularly difficult. 100-150 yards, decent angles and magically the dressed in black on a bright sunny day shooters that go completely unnoticed. Not one drone at the event, not one.

When will this shooter show up in a Blackrock training video or commercial? I bet this person is as they say................known to the FBI.
 
Allergies are for pussy libtards with weak constitutions. Why you crying, you a woman?
I've cried several times. Rarely because of being sad (like now), but I cry when I'm moved. Sometimes I cry when the The National Anthem plays. I can be tough too, but I am not emotionally stunted. I am a complete and fully formed human being capable of love, anger, sadness, and the whole gamut of human emotion. Being a man doesn't mean not having emotions. I means being in control of them, and using your brain. Sometimes it is right to be sad or happy, and there is no shame in showing it.
 
The trans fad has created a lot of defective people. They fucked them up young. This shit isn't going anyway anytime soon.

Don’t forget lockdowns… and they have been raised since almost birth in the leftist clown world that we entered in Jan 2009.

Add to that recreational pharma… Ritalin… Xanax and a cocktail of shit that these nar nar’s have been fed. Oh and clot shots/rna shots and so many vaccines and other “shots” that no one knows what kind of chemical cocktail is pulsing through their systems.

Teachers brainwashing about the planet… calling everyone a Nazi… in an orchestrated campaign that was right out of the 1930s Hitler youth and the Soviet Union’s Young Octoberists. And who can forget chairman Mao and his little red guards. All brainwashed kids who were warriors to destroy the fabric of a nation.

There are hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of these unguided missiles and ticking timebombs…

Sirhr
 
Last edited:
Leftists should never have access to firearms. They engage in political violence as a rule once they don’t get their way, because they have no valid arguments and base everything off emotion.
^^^100% THIS^^^

And not only that they should be denied the other items in the Bill of Rights.

Those who wish to destroy our constitutional republic do NOT deserve what it provides.
 
  • Like
Reactions: waveslayer
He was most certainly not reaching for his own wound.
The hands coming up is not uncommon in head and neck shots. He was instantly lights out.

Edit to add the correct term. Decorticate posturing. Thanks akmike.
So, you’re an expert now. And your source is AKMike. It’ll take a lot more training and experience than a drawing for you to hold forth. You’ll find that your source isn’t well thought of, on this forum. Try harder.
 
How can you claim to be pro-2A if you don't support 2A for all?

And I'm sure the irony of this:



is not lost on you, when we have an unhinged Executive branch sending American troops to occupy American cities (looking at you, 3rd Amendment) or ICE black van disappearing people without due process regardless of their citizenship or visa status (4th and 6th Amendments). What makes America great is the entire Bill of Rights that grands all of us protections from tyranny, regardless of what you or I think about the person being protected by it.

If you don't believe that the 2nd Amendment applies to all US Citizens then you and @LRRPF52 should probably just move to Somalia, where only the in-group has access to guns. I'm sure you'll do very well over there, and just think about how you could buy a couple of FA AK-47 for $400. Win-win in my book.
Gibberish

IMG_8463.gif
 
Here we go, all these mass shootings and assassinations kicking off the 8th stage of genocide right before our eyes. Weaponized, disposable tranny trigger men but they're the ones being genocided! Every accusation an admission, accuse them of what you're doing. Crying out in pain as they strike
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCP
Did you cry for Uvalde? Did you cry for Sandy Hook? Did you cry for Evergreen Colorado? Did you cry for Melissa and Mark Hortman? How about Tamir Rice? Ahmaud Arbery?

It's good to have feelings. I'm not saying it's not (though people like @BCP don't deserve my respect of their feelings). But to selectively have feelings when there is senseless loss of American lives daily makes me question one's morals and by extension the sincerity of those feelings. If you have empathy for one, you should be capable of having empathy for all, regardless of what race or political affiliation they have, because we are all human.
No. I didn't "know" any of those people at all, and I did not see them murdered on video. With the exception of the Hortman's, which was some sort of deranged political killing, not at all clear it was some rightwing thing at all, all of those people were senselessly murdered. There were no political messages scrawled on the shell casings, and they seemed to be murdered is some demonic celebration of death rather than life. I felt sadness and regret for the senseless murder, but the emotional connection was not there. When my friend's 5y/o drown I blubbered like a child I was so sad. When my brother died of a heart attack at a fishing tournament, and my CPR and the efforts of the EMS failed I cried for days, barely got through my eulogy through balling and breathing spasms like a kid, and still feel sadness thinking about it years later.

I am guessing from your picks on what to feel sad about you have some political point to make. Why don't you just make it? Yes, Charlie Kirk was having a huge impact on our national politics, and changing lives for the good if you ask me, and even though he wasn't my "friend" he easily could have been, and would have slid seamlessly into my life. Does that elicit a stronger emotional reaction? Yes, it does. Doesn't seem that complicated.

I didn't "know" Charlie Kirk. I wasn't in his orbit, and didn't really even "follow" him in the modern vernacular, but when I did hear him speak I have to say that we were on the same page, and both understand the difference between propaganda lies and the Truth (capital T). I know he was devoted to his family, and the people coming forward and telling stories about how he lived his life, which none of us knew, are extremely touching. I have to say, that he IS someone we would go boating with and have out to the cabin, and invite on fishing and hunting trips, because he seems exactly like the kind of guy my family associates with regularly. He was certainly more outspoken than anyone I do know personally, but I have to say that his views align perfectly with my own and the vast majority of my friends, and he was killed for openly voicing those views, so yea, hits close to home and elicits a stronger emotional reaction that it would from a complete stranger or someone who believes the opposite of what I believe is the truth in this reality.

So while I might be horrified and sad that anyone in America is murdered for their political views and their exposition of truth and reality, I do feel a stronger connection to the people who see it like I do, and especially anyone who is able to speak the truth so effectively. It is not at all surprising that a happy warrior like him draws the hatred of those who live in lies and venerate them. As was said early and even first, he was killed not just for what he believed, but because he was so effective. The more I learn about him the sadder it is, because he wasn't just an advocate for the truth, he was an exceptional human being who was dedicated to winning the ideological war through dialog and peace, something the other side isn't at all interested in.
 

18 U.S. Code § 2331 - Definitions​

prev | next
As used in this chapter—
(1)the term “international terrorism” means activities that—
(A)
involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any State;
(B)appear to be intended—
(i)
to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii)
to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii)
to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
(C)
occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to intimidate or coerce, or the locale in which their perpetrators operate or seek asylum;
(2)
the term “national of the United States” has the meaning given such term in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act;
(3)
the term “person” means any individual or entity capable of holding a legal or beneficial interest in property;
(4)the term “act of war” means any act occurring in the course of—
(A)
declared war;
(B)
armed conflict, whether or not war has been declared, between two or more nations; or
(C)
armed conflict between military forces of any origin;
(5)the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that—
(A)
involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
(B)appear to be intended—
(i)
to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii)
to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii)
to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
(C)
occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States; and
(6)the term “military force” does not include any person that—
(A)has been designated as a—
(i)
foreign terrorist organization by the Secretary of State under section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189); or
(ii)
specially designated global terrorist (as such term is defined in section 594.310 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations) by the Secretary of State or the Secretary of the Treasury; or
(B)
has been determined by the court to not be a “military force”.