Remington xm-3 vs Remington 40XS

semperfi83

Private
Minuteman
Jul 9, 2010
4
1
42
Hi.
I'm recently looking at a Remington xm-3 (Not darpa) complett with scope NF, and one 40xs with a Mark4
Would like to know witch of this rifles you guys had chose?

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • 20250812_134356.jpg
    20250812_134356.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 163
  • 20250812_134346.jpg
    20250812_134346.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 165
  • Like
Reactions: RemCustom6
Ok thanks.
Whats the differents in the Darpa xm3 and the xm3 from custom
The DARPA ones were made by IBA. I had one recently built by IBA and am disappointed in the build quality. They added a US stamp to the receiver that was originally not there and several other things and when I called them out I was told I was the problem. There is a thread on mine here. For the money have someone like LRI build one. Or tell IBA not to do certain things. I tried to tell them I wanted it stamped and marked like the originals. Mine came back and is not. So good luck.
 
I always liked the looks of the xm3, especially when you'd see in country pics. A friend was gathering parts to build one, as close as possible. He gave up on some parts and decided against 308 and went 6.5creed. I can tell you that after shooting it he and I hated that stock. Even with a scope mounted as low as possible, you still need to build up cheek area. Also that grip sucks if you spent a little time with a3-a5 mcm or most manners. Im sure ill catch hell for this but a "modern" xm3 would be similar profile 6.5creed in a lrh(not sure if it supports a nv bridge) or a prs1 or 2(whichever is the sloped butt stock bottom) with mini chassis or minimum bedded with ai dbm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moosemeat
I always liked the looks of the xm3, especially when you'd see in country pics. A friend was gathering parts to build one, as close as possible. He gave up on some parts and decided against 308 and went 6.5creed. I can tell you that after shooting it he and I hated that stock. Even with a scope mounted as low as possible, you still need to build up cheek area. Also that grip sucks if you spent a little time with a3-a5 mcm or most manners. Im sure ill catch hell for this but a "modern" xm3 would be similar profile 6.5creed in a lrh(not sure if it supports a nv bridge) or a prs1 or 2(whichever is the sloped butt stock bottom) with mini chassis or minimum bedded with ai dbm.
All the time I think about building something in an a1-3 or htg stock for the old school look. I always end up talking myself out of it because I know a different configuration will probably be more comfortable to shoot. With what it costs to put together a precision rifle I want to make sure it's something I'm going to enjoy shooting.
 
I am guessing that Semperfi83 is a fellow Swede?
As those exact rifles are on the shelf at the biggest huntingstores in Sweden.
Thats correct.

I have not decide yet witch rifle to go on.
We have like a "smal" debate with the ar15/10 rifle in Sweden that im waiting to see the outcome from.
I have today a old "Sniper" SSG 69 PII.
If I compare the xm3 with the ssg 69 the xm3 is way more balanced.
The ssg 69 is extreme front havey.