Democrats Can’t Count / Common Core Math Fail

Interesting math here:

“I would need people to show up for three straight weeks seven days a week, eight hours a day and the perfect scenario to get 105,000 ballots tabulated by hand,” Tempert said, a scenario which would include no attrition by any of the volunteers. With no increase in the number of votes, it would take 657 eight-hour days to tally 105,000 ballots.”

Let’s see, in sentence #1: 3x7x8 =168 hours or 21 eight hour days.

Last sentence: “657 eight hour days”

Hmmm…🤔
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ronws and 918v
Interesting math here:

“I would need people to show up for three straight weeks seven days a week, eight hours a day and the perfect scenario to get 105,000 ballots tabulated by hand,” Tempert said, a scenario which would include no attrition by any of the volunteers. With no increase in the number of votes, it would take 657 eight-hour days to tally 105,000 ballots.”

Let’s see, in sentence #1: 3x7x8 =168 hours or 21 eight hour days.

Last sentence: “657 eight hour days”

Hmmm…🤔

I propose that each party has an opportunity to count serial numbered paper ballots using a simple machine that is not connected to a computer, that has been certified immediately before the count, and certified after count. The ballots are simple fill in the bubble type. If you don’t fill in the bubble completely then it’s on you. I know that is racist and unfair but it is the only way to have a honest election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lash and 91Eunozs
Can't count by hand, it will take too long! Unlike the days, weeks and months it's taking with machines and computers. Derp, derp, derp.


Much like the news, it's more important to get the wrong info fast than the right info slow.


ETA: still thinking about this. Does it really take THAT MUCH longer to count them than it does to cast them? It's pretty much the same act.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ronws and lash