• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Libya

Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: The Mechanic</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Ol' F.D.H</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Guys, hate to say this but we had Marine Guards at the Iranian embassy in '79. They were ordered to stand down by the Ambassador. This cat probably would have given the same order and the guards would have complied the same as in '79. </div></div>
After watching his video I have to totally agree with you.
<object width="425" height="350"> <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HR68TO7Xxag&feature=g-hist"></param> <param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HR68TO7Xxag&feature=g-hist" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"> </embed></object> </div></div>

I really wish I hadn't watched that.

His Fairy Tale about the "great work" we're doing in Libya, and how the Ambassador was "thrilled to see the Libyan people stand up for their rights" is emblematic of the disconnect between advertised intent and the reality on the ground. Nicely produced propaganda piece from the State Dept. that continues the false narrative while the streets are on fire. I weep for the Republic.
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: mlw332</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Broker</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Some of the embassies are protected by DoD Contractors for their response teams including the Embassy in Kabul. There may have very well not been Marines there but Contractors instead which leaves me to wonder where the fuck those guys were at in all this...

</div></div>

I will say this I was one of those DoD contractors at the Embassy in Kabul. When shit hit the fan we were ready to roll every time and our ROE would have came into play as soon as an event like this started. And I would be lead to believe had this embassy been guarded by US contractors as several others are then those guys would have stood their ground the same as we did. So I dont see this being an issue of "where the fuck those guys were at in all this.." </div></div>

I have no doubt the people in Kabul would, especially since I personally know one of your prior Supervisors, but... Unless it's the same outfit at every embassy then neither you or I know whether or not they would act the same. According to the news though it looks like it was a "local" security force which is unfortunate.
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SANDRAT</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

According to the "News" outlets,there were/was a Local Libyan security detail.

As far back as Vietnam,and later Iraq and Afghanistan,the value of "Local" security has been worse than useless.Why would anybody but a complete blithering idiot think the Libyans would be any different ?

The only person an American can count on to have their back in hostile territory is another ARMED American........
</div></div>


Hey, I would back a American just as much as I would back an Aussie.

More so the US because Au is gone to shit.
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SANDRAT</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The only person an American can count on to have their back in hostile territory is another ARMED American........</div></div>How lucky you are to have traveled while having so many of them at your disposal.

In my experience I would take ability over nationality any day of the week.
 
Re: Libya

laHT5.jpg

RA0bJ.jpg

r4eSy.jpg
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: shankster</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
laHT5.jpg

RA0bJ.jpg

r4eSy.jpg
</div></div>

That likely represents the true feelings of 60-65% of Libya's population. How dangerous do people think it is to carry posters like that when there are hard core Qaeda and Jihadists running around with AK's and RPG's. There are likely 5% who are out and out hard core fanatics regarding religious beliefs. Libya recently had free elections and the current opposition- call them the Muslim Brotherhood was defeated by about 60% of the vote.

If it was up to professional diplomats there would likely never be a war. They would all collectively talk themselves to death. I think there was a security breakdown in Libya. The Libyan Government has apologized for this event. This is a country which has had rival tribes fighting each other after the death of Gaddafi for six months after his downfall.

The events in Egypt are more troubling. It's government hasn't condemned the attack. Perhaps the $1.5 billion in annual aid there needs review. Mohamed Morsi has stood up to Iran and called them out over the war in Syria. Mohamed Morsi only won the recent Egyptian elections by less than 5% over moderates. So 45% of the Egyptian population voted against him. Thats called democracy, its messy.

Libya
Despite everything, it’s still a success

Sep 13th 2012, 5:32 by The Economist

THE murder of Christopher Stevens, the American ambassador to Libya, along with three of his colleagues at his consulate in Benghazi, Libya’s second city, was not an isolated instance of violence directed against Westerners since the fall of Muammar Qaddafi’s regime nearly a year ago. In the past few months the British ambassador’s convoy on a visit to Benghazi has been attacked. So have the offices of the Red Cross and the UN in that city, the cradle of the Libyan revolution. The perpetrators of all those crimes were thought to be Salafists espousing an extreme fundamentalist version of Islam that harks back to the days of the Prophet Muhammad.

In the past few weeks Salafists have also attacked shrines in Tripoli, the capital, and elsewhere in Libya that have been venerated for centuries by Sufis, who practise a mystical form of Islam that many puritans consider idolatrous. One such shrine, honouring al-Shaab al-Dahmani, was in full view of the Radisson Blu Hotel, a favourite venue for visiting foreign bigwigs and prominent Libyans. What astonished them was that the destroyers of the shrine were allowed, over a period of 48 hours, to pillage and bulldoze the site without the ministry of interior or its police apparently lifting a finger to stop them.

This suggests either that the extreme Islamists typified by the Salafists have friends in high places protecting them or that the government and its security arm, however well-intentioned, is too feeble or disorganised to deal robustly with them. Either way, it is unlikely to encourage investment or reassure sceptics that security in the country is under control.

Indeed, a further disquieting aspect of the new Libya is the continuing ability of local militias, especially in places such as Misrata and Zintan that bore the burden of the battle against Qaddafi, to ignore the writ of the central government. Moreover, tribal and ethnic tensions on the fringes of the country and in remote southern cities such as Sebha and Kufra, continue to provoke periodic outbreaks of violence that stir bad blood and deter investors.

Yet there has also been remarkable progress, especially on the political front, in the months since the death of Qaddafi on October 20th. On September 12th the newly elected General National Congress, a proto-parliament, elected Mustafa Abushagur, a secular-minded electrical engineering professor previously based in California who had been in exile for 31 years, as prime minister. He is expected in a few weeks to appoint Libya’s first-ever democratically chosen government. Another body, whose method of selection is unclear, will write a constitution. A full-fledged parliament is to be elected within 18 months. These steady advances have been achieved with surprisingly little discord and much satisfaction after decades of tyranny. The mood in the country is still overwhelmingly hopeful.

The most striking outcome of the congressional election in July was the relative failure of the Islamists, whose main party, Justice and Construction, allied to the Muslim Brotherhood, got only 17 out of the 80 seats elected by proportional representation on party lists, whereas a coalition of secularists, liberals and milder Islamists won 39. An Islamist party including Abdelhakim Belhaj that was lavishly financed by Qatar, got no seats at all. It may, however, take a while to identify the congress’s overall ideological hue because 120 of its 200 members are independents elected on individual slates, usually without advertising a religious or informal party affiliation.

Some ugly xenophobic traits, however, have also become apparent. The outgoing ruling council decreed that no candidate for prime minister should have either a foreign passport or a foreign spouse, thus forcing a slew of prominent returnees either to withdraw their candidacy or to disavow a second nationality. The issuing of visas to foreigners is also fraught, with Islamists in the relevant ministries suspected of being loth to welcome Westerners. Journalists thought to portray the country too candidly have been have been castigated.

Establishing the rule of law remains the most daunting and urgent task for the incoming government. The Supreme Security Committee, an agency set up under the national transitional council, has acquired too much power, lacks accountability and may have been responsible for the lackadaisical response to the desecration of the Sufi shrines. The Salafist groups, especially in the east, who have been committing crimes such as the murder of Mr Stevens, need suppressing fast. On September 11th the UN’s secretary-general called for fair trials and decent treatment for 7,000 detainees, most of them held by the justice ministry or by local military councils or security committees.

A former Western ambassador who monitors the new Libya airs three possible scenarios: the first, eyeing the rapid recovery of the oil industry and rapid progress towards democracy, he called “nothing succeeds like success”. That, he reckoned, had a 30% chance of realisation. The second was a “downward spiral” into disaster, spurred by factional fighting and government chaos. That, he surmised, had a 20% chance of coming true. Most likely, he reckoned, Libya would “get by”, with dodgy security and messy politics for some time to come. That was the likeliest outcome and, on balance, it would count as a success.

http://www.economist.com/blogs/newsbook/2012/09/libya
 
Re: Libya

I just can't buy our ambassador's body dragged through the street, and ZERO EKIA.

<span style="font-size: 17pt"><span style="font-weight: bold">ZERO?</span>
</span>

Our embassies are attacked around the world in a violent and coordinated fashion, a US ambassador is dead, and there are ZERO EKIA. Something stinks here. I can't be the only one who smells it.

--Fargo007
 
Re: Libya

What pisses me off is our own goverenment condems that silly video a hell of a lot more then they condem the slaughter of Christians by muslims.
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Phil1</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Libya, despite everything, it’s still a success</div></div>

Hilarious.
 
Re: Libya

I can't believe with the other embassies being attacked, recently, that this is over a video. Sec. Clinton is making this over a video. There has been a ton of movies made on JC that are considered to be controversially and you don't see this kind of violence.

Here's what the USA should do. Leave the area and let those who live there work it out. The good people who live there need to stand up and fight the evil that is around them.
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Guy Montag</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Phil1</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Libya, despite everything, it’s still a success</div></div>

Hilarious. </div></div>

"Gaddafi supported militant organizations that held anti-Western sympathies around the world.[107] The Foreign Minister of Libya called the massacres "heroic acts".[108] Gaddafi fueled a number of Islamist and communist militant groups in the Philippines, including the New People's Army of the Communist Party of the Philippines and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front. The country still struggles with their murders and kidnappings.[48][109][110] In Indonesia, the Organisasi Papua Merdeka was a Libyan backed militant group. Vanuatu's ruling party also enjoyed Libyan support. In Australia he attempted to radicalize Australian Aborigines, left-wing unions,[111] Arab Australians,[111] against the "imperialist" government of Australia.[93][93] In the United Kingdom he financed the Workers Revolutionary Party.[111][112]

Gaddafi explicitly stated that it "is the Libyan people's responsibility to liquidate" Libyan dissidents that had escaped from Libya, unless they "repent" and return to the Libyan Jamahiriya, raising tensions with refugee countries and European governments. In 1985, he stated that he would continue to support the Red Army Faction, the Red Brigades, and the Irish Republican Army (IRA), as long as European countries supported anti-Gaddafi Libyans.[70] In 1976, after a series of attacks by the IRA, Gaddafi announced that "the bombs which are convulsing Britain and breaking its spirit are the bombs of Libyan people. We have sent them to the Irish revolutionaries so that the British will pay the price for their past deeds".[70] In April 1984 some Libyan refugees in London protested the execution of two dissidents. Libyan diplomats shot at 11 people and killed Yvonne Fletcher, a British policewoman. ...

On 5 April 1986, Libyan agents bombed "La Belle" nightclub in West Berlin, killing three and injuring 229. Gaddafi's plan was intercepted by several national intelligence agencies and more detailed information was retrieved four years later from Stasi archives...

Following the 1986 bombing of Libya, Gaddafi intensified his support for anti-American government organizations. He financed Jeff Forts Al-Rukn faction of the Chicago Black P. Stones gang, in their emergence as an indigenous anti-American armed revolutionary movement.[120] Members of Al-Rukn were arrested in 1986 for preparing to conduct strikes on behalf of Libya, including blowing up U.S. government buildings and bringing down an airplane; the Al-Rukn defendants were convicted in 1987 of "offering to commit bombings and assassinations on U.S. soil for Libyan payment."[120] In 1986, Libyan state television announced that Libya was training suicide squads to attack American and European interests. He began financing the IRA again in 1986, to retaliate against the British for harboring American fighter planes.[121]...

During Gaddafi's time in power, the Libyan government was implicated in the financing of many anti-western groups, including several terror plots. The Black Panther Party, Nation of Islam, and the Irish Republican Army all allegedly had links to Muammar Gaddafi.[122] Due of Libya's links to Irish terrorism, the United Kingdom cut off diplomatic relations with Libya for more than a decade. However, in the most famous instance, Libya was implicated in the 1988 Lockerbie bombing. During this event, the plane Pan Am Flight 103, carrying 270 people exploded near Lockerbie, Scotland, killing 270 people. On 22 February 2011 during the Libyan civil war, the former Libyan Justice Minister Mustafa Abdul Jalil in an interview with the Swedish newspaper "Expressen", claimed to have evidence that Muammar Gaddafi had personally ordered the bombing."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muammar_Gaddafi

But why not shoot first and aim later.

 
Re: Libya

The film issue is a false flag / red herring.

If they can phrase the narrative as being all "about the film" then they don't have to address it as the coordinated attack that it really is.


--Fargo007
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Phil1</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Guy Montag</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Phil1</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Libya, despite everything, it’s still a success</div></div>

Hilarious. </div></div>

"Gaddafi supported militant organizations that held anti-Western sympathies around the world.[107] The Foreign Minister of Libya called the massacres "heroic acts".[108] Gaddafi fueled a number of Islamist and communist militant groups in the Philippines, including the New People's Army of the Communist Party of the Philippines and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front. The country still struggles with their murders and kidnappings.[48][109][110] In Indonesia, the Organisasi Papua Merdeka was a Libyan backed militant group. Vanuatu's ruling party also enjoyed Libyan support. In Australia he attempted to radicalize Australian Aborigines, left-wing unions,[111] Arab Australians,[111] against the "imperialist" government of Australia.[93][93] In the United Kingdom he financed the Workers Revolutionary Party.[111][112]

Gaddafi explicitly stated that it "is the Libyan people's responsibility to liquidate" Libyan dissidents that had escaped from Libya, unless they "repent" and return to the Libyan Jamahiriya, raising tensions with refugee countries and European governments. In 1985, he stated that he would continue to support the Red Army Faction, the Red Brigades, and the Irish Republican Army (IRA), as long as European countries supported anti-Gaddafi Libyans.[70] In 1976, after a series of attacks by the IRA, Gaddafi announced that "the bombs which are convulsing Britain and breaking its spirit are the bombs of Libyan people. We have sent them to the Irish revolutionaries so that the British will pay the price for their past deeds".[70] In April 1984 some Libyan refugees in London protested the execution of two dissidents. Libyan diplomats shot at 11 people and killed Yvonne Fletcher, a British policewoman. ...

On 5 April 1986, Libyan agents bombed "La Belle" nightclub in West Berlin, killing three and injuring 229. Gaddafi's plan was intercepted by several national intelligence agencies and more detailed information was retrieved four years later from Stasi archives...

Following the 1986 bombing of Libya, Gaddafi intensified his support for anti-American government organizations. He financed Jeff Forts Al-Rukn faction of the Chicago Black P. Stones gang, in their emergence as an indigenous anti-American armed revolutionary movement.[120] Members of Al-Rukn were arrested in 1986 for preparing to conduct strikes on behalf of Libya, including blowing up U.S. government buildings and bringing down an airplane; the Al-Rukn defendants were convicted in 1987 of "offering to commit bombings and assassinations on U.S. soil for Libyan payment."[120] In 1986, Libyan state television announced that Libya was training suicide squads to attack American and European interests. He began financing the IRA again in 1986, to retaliate against the British for harboring American fighter planes.[121]...

During Gaddafi's time in power, the Libyan government was implicated in the financing of many anti-western groups, including several terror plots. The Black Panther Party, Nation of Islam, and the Irish Republican Army all allegedly had links to Muammar Gaddafi.[122] Due of Libya's links to Irish terrorism, the United Kingdom cut off diplomatic relations with Libya for more than a decade. However, in the most famous instance, Libya was implicated in the 1988 Lockerbie bombing. During this event, the plane Pan Am Flight 103, carrying 270 people exploded near Lockerbie, Scotland, killing 270 people. On 22 February 2011 during the Libyan civil war, the former Libyan Justice Minister Mustafa Abdul Jalil in an interview with the Swedish newspaper "Expressen", claimed to have evidence that Muammar Gaddafi had personally ordered the bombing."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muammar_Gaddafi

But why let history interfere with knee jerk reactions.

</div></div>

I don't think with the limited time that Gaddafi has been gone that there is enough history to judge whether or not things are better. Remember at the end of his regime he was taking money from the US to combat terrorist in Lybia.
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: fargo007</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The film issue is a false flag / red herring. </div></div>Those are two very different things. Which one are you saying it is, and why? <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: fargo007</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If they can phrase the narrative as being all "about the film" then they don't have to address it as the coordinated attack that it really is.</div></div>Is there evidence that this was a coordinated attack? If so, by whom and with what was it coordinated - the attack in Egypt?
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Graham</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: fargo007</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The film issue is a false flag / red herring. </div></div>Those are two very different things. Which one are you saying it is, and why? <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: fargo007</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If they can phrase the narrative as being all "about the film" then they don't have to address it as the coordinated attack that it really is.</div></div>Is there evidence that this was a coordinated attack? If so, by whom and with what was it coordinated - the attack in Egypt? </div></div>

Depends on which side you look at it from.

False flag on the part of the attackers. A fake justification or cover for the attack.

Red herring on the part of the US administration to blame it on a film (that they cannot do anything about) and avoid acting in an election year.

Multiple US embassies get hit on 9-11 by organized, well armed forces. They kill an ambassador in one, and have a black (Al Qaeda) flag ready to replace the US flag in another.

My mildot master and magic 8-ball both agree these are not coincidences.

--Fargo007
 
Re: Libya

The film is nothing more than a bad excuse. Should we return in kind with every video posted by Islams desecrating cemeteries, condemning Christian's, or beheading Americans? They should consider themselves lucky we have such a weak administration that doesn't return the favor 10 fold and lay waste to their already crumbling countries...
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: fargo007</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Graham</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: fargo007</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The film issue is a false flag / red herring. </div></div>Those are two very different things. Which one are you saying it is, and why? <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: fargo007</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If they can phrase the narrative as being all "about the film" then they don't have to address it as the coordinated attack that it really is.</div></div>Is there evidence that this was a coordinated attack? If so, by whom and with what was it coordinated - the attack in Egypt? </div></div>

Depends on which side you look at it from.

False flag on the part of the attackers. A fake justification or cover for the attack.

Red herring on the part of the US administration to blame it on a film (that they cannot do anything about) and avoid acting in an election year.

Multiple US embassies get hit on 9-11 by organized, well armed forces. They kill an ambassador in one, and have a black (Al Qaeda) flag ready to replace the US flag in another.

My mildot master and magic 8-ball both agree these are not coincidences.

--Fargo007


</div></div>

"Psychological warfare (PSYWAR), or the basic aspects of modern psychological operations (PSYOP), have been known by many other names or terms, including Psy Ops, Political Warfare, “Hearts and Minds”, and Propaganda.[1] Various techniques are used, by any set of groups, and aimed to influence a target audience's value systems, belief systems, emotions, motives, reasoning, or behavior. It is used to induce confessions or reinforce attitudes and behaviors favorable to the originator's objectives, and are sometimes combined with black operations or false flag tactics. Target audiences can be governments, organizations, groups, and individuals"
from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_warfare

Thousands have protested the film outside the US embassy in Cairo [AFP]

An obscure slapstick film said to be entitled Innocence of Muslims or Life of Muhammed has been cited as the cause for riots at US diplomatic posts in Egypt and Libya.

But the existence of the purported filmmaker, Sam Bacile, allegedly a 52-year-old Israeli-American real estate developer, has not been proven.

In interviews with the AP news agency and the Wall Street Journal, a man calling himself "Sam Bacile" said he had raised about $5m to produce the film. He also was quoted describing Islam as "a cancer", and claimed he had raised money from "about 100 Jewish donors" to make the video.

But the interview subject did not even give the same age during his two known press interviews, as he told the AP he was 56.


The man said the amateur, two-hour-long film had involved dozens of actors and was produced in California in 2011. But new reports suggest neither any prior social media presence by the director nor any IMDB page for the film.

The director of the California Film Commission - which issues permits for films that are shot in the state, told the Huffington Post that no permit was ever granted to someone by the name "Sam Bacile".

'Desert Warrior'

The trailer for the film - which itself is so far unavailable to the public - portrays Islam’s Prophet Muhammad as a fraud and a womaniser, and depicts him having sex. The entire film has only been shown once in public, at a theatre in Hollywood, said the source who identified himself as "Bacile".

He also explained he made the film because “after 9/11 everybody should be in front of the judge”, AP reported. "Even Jesus, even Muhammad."

But actors who participated in the filming now say they had no idea the film was even about Muhamad or Islam. The original casting call was reportedly for a film called "Desert Warrior" by director Alan Roberts.

And all the film's religious references were actually dubbed after the original shooting.

"Bacile" is now reportedly in hiding, even though reports suggest that the name is merely cover for a larger group, or a pseudonym for someone who may be neither Israeli nor Jewish - but who cited such an identify to inflame tensions.

One of the actresses who says she was tricked into being in the film says "Bacile" told her on set that he was Egyptian, and that he spoke Arabic to other men present.

Reuters has reported that Egypt's Coptic Orthodox church issued a statement condemning some Egyptian Christians living aboard who it said had financed "the production of a film insulting Prophet Muhammad".

In Egypt and Libya, public anger at the video spilled over on Tuesday, leading to the death of the US ambassador in Benghazi, Libya and the evacuation of embassy workers in Cairo.

Spread on social media

How did an obscure film trailer come to have international ramifications? It was first posted on YouTube by a user called "sam bacile" in July 2012, and has received about 450,000 views to date.

The trailer began to get more attention in September. On September 4, the same user posted a version dubbed in Arabic, which has garnered tens of thousands of views.

Morris Sadek, a Coptic Christian born in Egypt but who lives in the US, told AP he had been promoting the film on his website. He also tweeted a link to the trailer on September 9.

Sadek, the head of the National American Coptic Assembly, is known for his vehemently anti-Islam views, and told the Wall Street Journal that “the violence that it [the film] caused in Egypt is further evidence of how violent the religion and people are".

Terry Jones, the Florida pastor whose burning of Qurans in 2011 spurred riots across the Muslim world leading to several deaths, also reportedly promoted the film.

The Arabic version of the trailer received heavy media coverage in Egypt last week, including by controversial hardline TV host Khaled Abdallah, who reported on the film on September 8.

A clip of the show was posted to YouTube on September 9, where it has received almost 400,000 views so far.

"The operation behind this film appears to be extreme Egyptian Copts who want to discredit the Morsi government and create a provocation," journalist Max Blumenthal told Al Jazeera.

"They oppose the revolution and are aligned with Christian right groups who have an apocalyptic, theocratic agenda and who are inciting against Muslim-Americans," Blumenthal said, adding, "They put Muslims in the US in danger, they put Copts in Egypt in danger, and they're putting US diplomats in danger."

The Afghan government on Wednesday temporarily blocked YouTube in an effort to discourage people from watching the clip. YouTube also blocked the video in Egypt, agency reports said.

In a statement issued on Wednesday, the company said: "We work hard to create a community everyone can enjoy and which also enables people to express different opinions.

"This can be a challenge because what's OK in one country can be offensive elsewhere.

"This video - which is widely available on the web - is clearly within our guidelines and so will stay on YouTube. However, given the very difficult situation in Libya and Egypt we have temporarily restricted access in both countries.

"Our hearts are with the families of the people murdered in [Tuesday's] attack in Libya."

Observers say Google has grown more averse to removing videos. After its 2006 acquisition of YouTube, it was accused of censorship in several high-profile controversies.

"They're squeezed on all sides," said Rebecca MacKinnon, a fellow at the New America Foundation. "But because of pressure from a lot of people who feel they made the wrong decisions, they now generally err on the side of keeping things up."

In recent years, Google has used technology to filter out videos in certain countries to comply with local regulations.

Source Al jazerra
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2012/09/201291214042970150.html

<span style="color: #FF0000">Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, Terry Jones, Bin Laden, et all. Yes we should let their attitudes and propaganda(and Al Jazeera/Fox news) influence how we think about Nation States.

So there is an Al Qaeda leader in Libya, they just lost the election to "American Puppets" how do we drive a wedge between the US and Libya so we can overturn this government. So we can put into place the most radical government possible. Use oil money to get nuclear weapons...Ah Western countries are like children, so easily manipulated, so reactionary, this is all too easy!</span>
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Phil1</div><div class="ubbcode-body">But why not shoot first and aim later. </div></div>

Your dimestore analysis of the situation is highly amusing, particularly given you inability to reconcile RECENT events.

Curious how your recollection of Libyan history IGNORES those developments, but I guess that conflicts with your narrative.

Any explanation for how the "bad guys" became US sub-contractors?

I realize it's difficult to keep the players straight w/o a scorecard, perhaps you can help.

No comment about the Al-Qaeda flag flying proudly over the COURTHOUSE in Benghazi?

By ARMING, FUNDING and TRAINING these "freedom fighters", we now reap what we've sown.

Carry on with the neo-con drivel, the streets are on fire and you feebly want to pretend like things are for the better.

Hilarious.
 
Re: Libya

A United States Consulate is NOT protected like an Embassy. Even at an Embassy the Marine Security Detachment is responsible for the physical security of the BUILDING and certain THINGS (commo, crypto, documents). The Regional Security Officer, a member of the Diplomatic Security Service, is in charge of the Mission and security force (usually local rent-a-cops).

The bottom line is three or more US Embassies and Consulates (sovereign US Territory) have been assaulted in the last week, on or around 9-11. The United States AMBASSADOR, the President's PERSONAL representative and Chief of Mission was murdered -- only the sixth ever to be slain on duty. Other staff were killed and injured.

"Protesting in the harshest terms" to a government that barely functions is not understood in that culture. They understand strength and the sword, and exploit weakness. It is their way.

Although it's just a movie, folks should watch the old John Milius film, "The Wind and the Lion," loosely based on fact and history regarding Teddy Roosevelt and the Moroccan Berbers.

The country really needs someone like Ronald Reagan back in the White House.

God save us all.
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sinister</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
The country really needs someone like Ronald Reagan back in the White House.

God save us all. </div></div>

Truer words could not be spoken...
 
Re: Libya

From the 13 Sep issue of The Guardian (UK), p1., "Obama vows to find killers of US ambassador in Libya":

"...Noman Benotman, a former Libyan jihadist who now runs the Quilliam think-tank in London, said he had information it was a terrorist attack that was planned to avenge Abu Yahya al-Libi, al-Qaida’s Libyan second-in-command, who was killed in a US drone strike a few months ago...."
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> "The Wind and the Lion," </div></div>

The one thing I have gotten from the movie was a quote from supposely Teddy Roosevelt. I don't know if Roosevelt really said it but its to the point.

When discussing sending the Marines to Lybia, the show of force. "The world will never love us, they may respect us, they may FEAR us, but they will never love us"

Fiction or not, no truer words have ever been spoken.
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: mlw332</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Broker</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Some of the embassies are protected by DoD Contractors for their response teams including the Embassy in Kabul. There may have very well not been Marines there but Contractors instead which leaves me to wonder where the fuck those guys were at in all this...

</div></div>

I will say this I was one of those DoD contractors at the Embassy in Kabul. When shit hit the fan we were ready to roll every time and our ROE would have came into play as soon as an event like this started. And I would be lead to believe had this embassy been guarded by US contractors as several others are then those guys would have stood their ground the same as we did. So I dont see this being an issue of "where the fuck those guys were at in all this.." </div></div>

Media outlets today have announced that the state department is acknowledging the Libya attack "appears to have been a planned terror operation (reportedly with machine guns & RPG's) and not a mob assault" as initially reported.

It is unlikely that 42 y.o. Glen Doherty, a private security contractor who arrived in Libya on Sept. 5 to protect Stevens, previously served 7 years as a SEAL, didn't "stand his ground". I have to say that timing of Doherty's arrival, unless part of a regularly scheduled rotational replacement since he did that detail before, does make me wonder if the state department had some forewarning...but offered too little too late and sent Doherty in on a death mission. Surely every ambassador in hostile country has some PSD, but it would be interesting to hear if different accomodations were in place immediately prior to the attacks. Then again maybe I don't really want to know...

Prayers and condolescences to the families of the victims.

Now Yemen is acting out too...
 
Re: Libya

Sources in the Middle East are reporting that it was not a spontaneous raid by angry Islamists, it was a professionally executed terrorist operation by an Al Qaeda team, whose 20 members acted under the orders of Ayman al Zawahri in revenge for the liquidation of top al Qaeda operative Abu Yahya al-Libi last June.
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Graham</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: fargo007</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The film issue is a false flag / red herring. </div></div>Those are two very different things. Which one are you saying it is, and why? <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: fargo007</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If they can phrase the narrative as being all "about the film" then they don't have to address it as the coordinated attack that it really is.</div></div>Is there evidence that this was a coordinated attack? If so, by whom and with what was it coordinated - the attack in Egypt? </div></div>

Okay. Well there ya go. It was also reported that Zawahiri's son was in the crowd. Not another coincidence....

--Fargo007
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Broker</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The film is nothing more than a bad excuse. Should we return in kind with every video posted by Islams desecrating cemeteries, condemning Christian's, or beheading Americans? They should consider themselves lucky we have such a weak administration that doesn't return the favor 10 fold and lay waste to their already crumbling countries... </div></div>

^This
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: UKDslayer</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 168BTHPM</div><div class="ubbcode-body">It is becoming increasingly difficult to be tolerant of a religion that promotes this kind of stuff through inaction.

091212_ambassadorkilled_20120912_153215.jpg
</div></div>

This man dedicated his entire life to civil service, attempted to create some harmony in one of the most politically turbulent and corrupt countries in the world and actually improve the quality of life of Libyans. He was a US citizen, put his life on the line and paid the ultimate sacrifice. Americans need to see this disturbing image and judge this administration by its retaliation - which I fear will be too brief and perfunctory not to mention shortly followed within a few months by a visit from Hillary with a check for a couple hundred million dollars in aid.

Its about time these governments take responsibility for policing their own ("minority" groups, terrorists, delinquents, whatever you choose to call them) and failure to do so is THAT government's responsibility. They need a good military spanking they won't soon forget followed by strong economic sanctions, not rewards. </div></div>

Actually it is about time Americans wake the f*ck up. If this man really felt that he was there pursuing American policies that were legitimately designed to make the region a better place he was truly naive. In fact his job is more akin to a front man handing out free candy and encouraging kids to get in the van with a child molester.

It ain't by accident......



Here is good place to start to clear some heads from our collective slumber:

The Grand Chessboard


Good luck
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: tylerw02</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Broker</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The film is nothing more than a bad excuse. Should we return in kind with every video posted by Islams desecrating cemeteries, condemning Christian's, or beheading Americans? They should consider themselves lucky we have such a weak administration that doesn't return the favor 10 fold and lay waste to their already crumbling countries... </div></div>

^This </div></div>

This administration is simply carrying on with the same psychotic foreign policy as the previous three.

Destabilizing the region requires thick skin and a willingness to sacrifice lives, even if it costs you an Ambassador or two.

I wouldn't call this weakness, I'd call it resolve, regardless how disgusting I personally find the whole situation.
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Guy Montag</div><div class="ubbcode-body">This administration is simply carrying on with the same psychotic foreign policy as the previous three.

Destabilizing the region requires thick skin and a willingness to sacrifice lives, even if it costs you an Ambassador or two.

I wouldn't call this weakness, I'd call it resolve, regardless how disgusting I personally find the whole situation. </div></div>

You just quantified what is now being considered a planned terrorist attack as our Administrations policy to undermine and already undermined regime and that America should simply grow "thick skin" and accept the loss as collateral damage.

So riddle me this Batman... What's the point in "Destabilizing the region" that's already destabilized? You should go look for your helmet before you get struck with any further ideas...
 
Re: Libya

Make the argument that we've IMPROVED the area, I'd love to hear it.

Deal with the realities of our actions, we've done FAR MORE harm than help.

Riddle me this Batman, who's currently in charge in Libya, and Egypt?

Does the flag of Al-Qaeda flying over the Courthouse in Benghazzi register in your world.

Roll the Team America theme song.
 
Re: Libya

Good to see our resident counterculture elite are out of the blocks and already running at full speed.

More to this than originally thought?

While this report (and others, including ABC News and FOX News) suggest a more deliberate and organized plot, I suggest it might be wise to await further corroboration and confirmation before working up a personal head of steam over this.

Meanwhile, allow me to perhaps offer some conjecture...

Back around the beginning of this year, I can recall being considered pessimistic (at least) for suggesting the Arab Spring was maybe not the joyous liberation others here were so enthusiastically embracing. I elected to refrain from contention on the subject, in favor of leaving such things to unfold on their own.

Dictators were overthrown, militant populists achieved whatever goals, and just between you and me, when such activities happen in the Middle East, there is no guarantee they are in any way aligned with what we Westerners might consider righteous and justifiable. IMHO, pretty much always quite to the contrary.

Yes, they were dictators; but they were dictators with whom we had managed to maintain favorable, or at least neutral, relations. I'm wondering how long it's going to take before folks begin to realize that we were better off with them, than we are now, without them.

Maybe, just maybe, somebody in State or Defense is going to realize that 9/11 is once again being celebrated by the bad guys. Just how obvious does it need to get before somebody in charge recognizes that America is undergoing another (series of?) full blown and carefully orchestrated terrorist attack(s)?

Two destroyers, eh? I seem to remember something happening involving two destroyers back in the 60's...

Are we really <span style="font-style: italic">still</span> that stupid?

An act of war is not just a rose by any other name. We are reaping what we've been nurturing. Arm an Arab, and you will <span style="font-style: italic">ALWAYS</span> end up with a knife in your back.

It's always somebody's fault, and there's always somebody, somewhere, trying to to convince us it's ours. Facts are, it's not our fault. Anything we do or don't do is likely to trigger the kind of behavior from them that they're exhibiting right now.

Those people hate anyone who isn't them. They hate us because we're us, and they're them. With all requisite respect, I cordially return the favor.

That fool (fool, maybe not...) with the movie probably thinks his encouragement of religious hatred is fully justified under the First Amendment. Maybe some other fools elsewhere, maybe even here, would agree.

Greg
 
Re: Libya

I am ready to leave this region and its religion of death to its own devices. No troops on the ground anymore, but no foreign aid either. Let them be, but keep an eye on them. Use our own energy sources, ALL of it to include coal and natural gas, and let the Saudis, Pakistanis, Libyans, Jordanians, Syrians, Yemenis, and Iranians do what they do best...kill each other. If we get indications they are putting together some action against us, we hit em hard and LEAVE. No rebuilding, no nothing. A smack in the mouth, reload, and follow up when necessary.

Its time we treat our friends like friends, and our enemies like enemies. The kind of diplomacy that bears some fruit with those of the judeo-christian ethic just doesn't work with Islam. We tried that with Turkey, thought it could work, but as Turkey's parliament becomes more Islamic it is failing too. We can't use the kind of diplomacy that worked with the Soviets either, because the Soviets actually cared about their own futures and wanted to live. Islam simply will not rest until there is no Israel. If we abandon Israel we will then find that Islam will not rest until WE and the rest of the world is Islamic as well. Listen to them - they are honest in their intentions. We try to "interpret" their convert or die demands through the prism of Western values...thinking they really must mean something else. I think we should take them at face value, like all threats. There is no middle ground with someone who demands your conversion or destruction.

So no more aid, and no more attempts to manipulate them or help them, and no more threatening them. Just leave em alone in their 8th century society, and smack them down when necessary to our safety.
 
Re: Libya

The response to the attacks has been appropriate on face value. I'm sure the attacks have in fact played to our benefit in that certain personnel have now come into the open and so a rock has been lifted and the ants are scurrying where before the ants may have been under the radar. The bigger danger would have been if the ants had remained hidden and allowed to grow bigger and more numerous...

I'm sure more than one 'protester' is being vigorously questioned and showing more than a mild eagerness to co-operate. Remember, Libya elected a clearly moderate government that defeated the Muslim Brotherhood who won in Egypt. The will of the Libyan people is not fanatical but like the majority of normal people, they'd rather go about their business than make a spectacle of things so they're hidden from our eyes by the media's 'if it ain't awesome it ain't news' filter.

The death of the Ambassador is regrettable but by all accounts of those who knew him, he knew the danger of his position and he should be regarded as as brave a man as any serving this country.

We, as a nation reliant upon oil and other assets in the middle east need some resolution or paradigm change in the region. We cannot be constantly at war with someone over there. The idea of the Arab Spring was perhaps a great one but again, the ants were allowed to infiltrate and so there's problem.

As always in our Foreign policy -we think big, but so big that we neglect the little details and those are ones where a red skinned, pointy tailed dude hides with the ants...

As for coincidences... there are no coincidences.
 
Re: Libya

I think treating our friends like friends and our enemies like enemies is a good theme.

Unfortunately, when the chips go down, America has one friend, America; and there are a daunting number of Americans who aren't America's friends, either.

I think a time is coming when tolerance of Americans who hate America is going to be on the wane.

Greg
 
Re: Libya

Just heard, Glen Doherty, former Navy SEAL, was one of the other Americans <span style="font-weight: bold"> assassinated</span> in Libya. Prayers to family and friends.
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Greg Langelius *</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I think treating our friends like friends and our enemies like enemies is a good theme.

Unfortunately, when the chips go down, America has one friend, America; and there are a daunting number of Americans who aren't America's friends, either.

I think a time is coming when tolerance of Americans who hate America is going to be on the wane.

Greg</div></div>
Greg, I don't disagree with you often, but I am definitely disagreeing with you here. There is Canada, Australia, and Great Britain as well. Though I am only speaking from the Canadian perspective. Ya'll has friends, the only thing is, do you want friends?
 
Re: Libya

Damn, you're right.

Just letting cynicism get the better of me again...

We want the friends. Canada, Oz, and Ol' Blighty, of course.

And where would we all be without France...? (Humor, ar, ar...)

Greg
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: KYpatriot</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I am ready to leave this region and its religion of death to its own devices. No troops on the ground anymore, but no foreign aid either. Let them be, but keep an eye on them. Use our own energy sources, ALL of it to include coal and natural gas, and let the Saudis, Pakistanis, Libyans, Jordanians, Syrians, Yemenis, and Iranians do what they do best...kill each other. If we get indications they are putting together some action against us, we hit em hard and LEAVE. No rebuilding, no nothing. A smack in the mouth, reload, and follow up when necessary.

Its time we treat our friends like friends, and our enemies like enemies. The kind of diplomacy that bears some fruit with those of the judeo-christian ethic just doesn't work with Islam. We tried that with Turkey, thought it could work, but as Turkey's parliament becomes more Islamic it is failing too. We can't use the kind of diplomacy that worked with the Soviets either, because the Soviets actually cared about their own futures and wanted to live. Islam simply will not rest until there is no Israel. If we abandon Israel we will then find that Islam will not rest until WE and the rest of the world is Islamic as well. Listen to them - they are honest in their intentions. We try to "interpret" their convert or die demands through the prism of Western values...thinking they really must mean something else. I think we should take them at face value, like all threats. There is no middle ground with someone who demands your conversion or destruction.

So no more aid, and no more attempts to manipulate them or help them, and no more threatening them. Just leave em alone in their 8th century society, and smack them down when necessary to our safety. </div></div>

I agree. I am all about cutting foreign aid to areas that have no capacity to give us anything back.

And how great would it be to fight a war like a war and not like building someone else's house while they shoot at you?
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Malaga2</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Why was the consulate not better protected? </div></div>

That sounds like a question for DSS, and if any of them are about I doubt they'd tip their hat. The two that I dealt with in Europe had no visible security other than a locked front door and a buzzer with camera. Of course, things then and there were much more relaxed.
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Guy Montag</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Make the argument that we've IMPROVED the area, I'd love to hear it.

Deal with the realities of our actions, we've done FAR MORE harm than help.

Riddle me this Batman, who's currently in charge in Libya, and Egypt?

Does the flag of Al-Qaeda flying over the Courthouse in Benghazzi register in your world.

Roll the Team America theme song. </div></div>

I never said anything about us improving the area, so spin that crap elsewhere. I also never commented on who was in charge or who should be in charge. I don't know why you're trying to mock the US with the "Team America" bullshit. No one ever gave the illusion that the US was ever running things over there. The comments you made was that we were somehow still trying to "destabilize" a Country that's already been destabilized. The flag comment also make ZERO sense since that was never the topic of discussion...
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Broker</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Guy Montag</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Make the argument that we've IMPROVED the area, I'd love to hear it.

Deal with the realities of our actions, we've done FAR MORE harm than help.

Riddle me this Batman, who's currently in charge in Libya, and Egypt?

Does the flag of Al-Qaeda flying over the Courthouse in Benghazzi register in your world.

Roll the Team America theme song. </div></div>

I never said anything about us improving the area, so spin that crap elsewhere. I also never commented on who was in charge or who should be in charge. I don't know why you're trying to mock the US with the "Team America" bullshit. No one ever gave the illusion that the US was ever running things over there. The comments you made was that we were somehow still trying to "destabilize" a Country that's already been destabilized. The flag comment also make ZERO sense since that was never the topic of discussion... </div></div>

Keep dancing Broker, what's next, your Two-Step or possibly the Meringue?

You can't comment on who's in charge, nor can offer an answer to why the flag of Al-Qaeda is flying over Benghazi because it PROVES my point how we've made things worse, but feel to keep up the charade. Your a cheerleader for these crusades, and won't take ownership for making an already dangerous region of the world EVEN MORE unstable. Congratulations on the effort. Have the honesty to own the effects of the policies you endorse, if you truly believe them. I now realize why the Al-Qaeda flag comment wouldn't make sense to you, seeing as you can't admit we've done more harm than help. When you're able answer how installing Al-Qaeda in Libya, Egypt and soon to be Syria, does anything but get more of our guys killed, I'm all ears for your next number. Until then, spin YOUR crap elsewhere.
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Guy Montag</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Broker</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Guy Montag</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Make the argument that we've IMPROVED the area, I'd love to hear it.

Deal with the realities of our actions, we've done FAR MORE harm than help.

Riddle me this Batman, who's currently in charge in Libya, and Egypt?

Does the flag of Al-Qaeda flying over the Courthouse in Benghazzi register in your world.

Roll the Team America theme song. </div></div>

I never said anything about us improving the area, so spin that crap elsewhere. I also never commented on who was in charge or who should be in charge. I don't know why you're trying to mock the US with the "Team America" bullshit. No one ever gave the illusion that the US was ever running things over there. The comments you made was that we were somehow still trying to "destabilize" a Country that's already been destabilized. The flag comment also make ZERO sense since that was never the topic of discussion... </div></div>

Keep dancing Broker, what's next, your Two-Step or possibly the Meringue?

You can't comment on who's in charge, nor can offer an answer to why the flag of Al-Qaeda is flying over Benghazi because it PROVES my point how we've made things worse, but feel to keep up the charade. Your a cheerleader for these crusades, and won't take ownership for making an already dangerous region of the world EVEN MORE unstable. Congratulations on the effort. Have the honesty to own the effects of the policies you endorse, if you truly believe them. I now realize why the Al-Qaeda flag comment wouldn't make sense to you, seeing as you can't admit we've done more harm than help. When you're able answer how installing Al-Qaeda in Libya, Egypt and soon to be Syria, does anything but get more of our guys killed, I'm all ears for your next number. Until then, spin YOUR crap elsewhere. </div></div>

The only dancing being done is by you trying to avoid the actual question by asking other questions on topics I never commented on to begin with. Like always you never answer the OP but simply come back with more questions and comments trying top spin the topic into something that was never commented on to begin with. You've got ZERO evidence to how we somehow were attempting to "destabilize" an already destabilized country accept to say that we created this blah blah blah... And for fuck sakes come up with your own one liner's rather than trying to regurgitate mine back at me and pretend you have an ounce of wit and not the oxygen thief you sound like ...
 
Re: Libya

You've ZERO evidence to refute the fact that things are worse now than before, but don't let that get in the way of your indignation.

Thanks for the chuckle, I look forward to your next number, perhaps a Foxtrot or Disco would be nice.
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Guy Montag</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I look forward to your next number, perhaps a Foxtrot or Disco would be nice. </div></div>

Was disco ever nice??
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Guy Montag</div><div class="ubbcode-body">You've ZERO evidence to refute the fact that things are worse now than before, but don't let that get in the way of your indignation.

Thanks for the chuckle, I look forward to your next number, perhaps a Foxtrot or Disco would be nice. </div></div>

I never argued that fact... You're so far off from the OP you must be dancing in the back of the short bus with a mirror. Again, you keep trying to avoid the question and go after some point that was never the topic to begin with in an attempt to distract from your original brain fart.

Let me help you out and ask it again since your too fucking stupid to get it the first 2x... How are we currently destabilizing a country that had already been destabilized? Try to focus... I know it's hard with so much oxygen going to your brain from your serious mouth breathing...
 
Re: Libya

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: DamnYuppie</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Guy Montag</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I look forward to your next number, perhaps a Foxtrot or Disco would be nice. </div></div>

Was disco ever nice?? </div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Guy Montag</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Keep dancing Broker, what's next, your Two-Step or possibly the Meringue?</div></div>

Disco? Only when they spread the Meringue all over everybody ...

R0fAQ.jpg


laugh.gif