• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

  • The site has been updated!

    If you notice any issues, please let us know below!

    VIEW THREAD

Rifle Scopes ERS 3.5-21 or XRS 4.5-30 for 308 bolt gun?

scatsob

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Oct 28, 2005
645
3
42
Jacksonville, NC
I am sorry that I have started a few optics threads about what to get but I have optics ADD something fierce. I recently got the .mil pricing on these two scopes and they are both are less than the .mil price for the Mark6 3-18. They only thing that really appealed to me about the Mark 6 was the weight and the open center of the new TMR reticle. On weight, my rifle is an M24 in an AICS so it is already heavy and I am in pretty good shape. On the reticle, while the TMR is nice, the G2 is no slouch and I like the functionality. I am just wondering what others thoughts are between these two scopes are. I have seen a couple people say that you can always dial a 30x scope down to 21x but you can't dial a 21x scope up to 30x and I agree with that. Is it basically a wash? I do want to start shooting FTR in the future is that makes a difference. Thanks for the imput :).
 
At 308 distances, the 3-21 is MORE than enough.
Depends if you need Zero stop and 10mil

If not you can save a ton on the reg G2DMR.
 
The deciding factors here are 3.5 vs 4.5 & price.

if you know 4.5 will work and the price difference to you is negligible, no reason to go with the 3.5-21.

I've got the xrs, it's a gorgeous piece of equipment. In the end I'm sure either would work, I'm a magnification whore.
 
I own both, so I will give you my take. First off, both optics tend to get fairly dark on the top end, the 3.5-21 gets deark around 18-19X and around 26X for the 4.5-30. This does not mean the optics are not "usable" at higher power, spoting and ranging is still possible. I never shoot anywhere near max magnification an any optic,so its not a issue for me. Both are compact and offer a lot of features for the money, but I would opt for the 3.5-21 on a 308, its more than enough.
 
I own both, so I will give you my take. First off, both optics tend to get fairly dark on the top end, the 3.5-21 gets deark around 18-19X and around 26X for the 4.5-30. This does not mean the optics are not "usable" at higher power, spoting and ranging is still possible. I never shoot anywhere near max magnification an any optic,so its not a issue for me. Both are compact and offer a lot of features for the money, but I would opt for the 3.5-21 on a 308, its more than enough.

I had been considering either of these. I too rarely use max mag, but even in positional shooting I rarely go below 10x. Sounds like if price is not an issue, my money would be better spent on the 4.5-30.

I appreciate the topic and you answering with true knowledge as you have both.

Ty
 
I own both, so I will give you my take. First off, both optics tend to get fairly dark on the top end, the 3.5-21 gets deark around 18-19X and around 26X for the 4.5-30. This does not mean the optics are not "usable" at higher power, spoting and ranging is still possible. I never shoot anywhere near max magnification an any optic,so its not a issue for me. Both are compact and offer a lot of features for the money, but I would opt for the 3.5-21 on a 308, its more than enough.

Thank you for the input. The brightness does not really concern me as well as I probably will never be shooting it in low light. Just out of curiosity, what do you have the 4.5-30 on?
 
I got a G2DMR in the original group buy and I really like it for hunting and long range steel with my 308. I like the G2 reticle so much that I had to find a way to get another one for my semi auto. I marked my zero with a paint pen, pretty easy to keep track of it and saved a lot of money. Zero stops would be cool but I don't have to have them. 5 mil rev is fine with me also, I like the big chunky clicks. I wouldn't mind trying a 10mil with zero stops don't get me wrong but the money saved leaves me with extra funds for other stuff, like the second G2DMR I eventually got.

I use it between 5-18 power. It tunnels a little around 3.5-4.5 and the eye box is a little funky at max power but it is a great scope. The tracking and reticle more than make up for the few shortcomings I see.

So far it has a big last light hog at 380 yards, a trotting coyote at 415 yards, a lot of 600 yard 10" steel hits, some at 772 and I'm still learning.
 
Last edited:
I run it on a 338 Edge. Just sold a S&B 5-25 off a TRG-22 i and plan on putting a 4.5-30 on top to replace it.

Sold a S&B to fund a lesser scope? That's interesting...
Am i reading it right, that the total elevation for the Bushnell ERS is only 50 MOA? That's the specs i see on midway's site and Bushnell's site. If that's true that's a MAJOR downfall. For a 34mm tube that doesn't sound right.

PCR/XLR/TAC338 http://i813.photobucket.com/albums/zz53/bodywerks/IMG_20130816_111453_255_zps1b498f0d.jpg http://i813.photobucket.com/albums/zz53/bodywerks/IMG_20130816_111325_951_zps290ebdd0.jpg
 
I am pretty sure I read somewhere that they have 34 mils of travel and the website is wrong.

Sold a S&B to fund a lesser scope? That's interesting...
Am i reading it right, that the total elevation for the Bushnell ERS is only 50 MOA? That's the specs i see on midway's site and Bushnell's site. If that's true that's a MAJOR downfall. For a 34mm tube that doesn't sound right.

PCR/XLR/TAC338 http://i813.photobucket.com/albums/zz53/bodywerks/IMG_20130816_111453_255_zps1b498f0d.jpg http://i813.photobucket.com/albums/zz53/bodywerks/IMG_20130816_111325_951_zps290ebdd0.jpg
 
Yeah a centered Turret has 50MOA of elevation. Put it on a 20 MOA base, and all of a sudden you have 70MOA elevation from center. Which is plenty IMHO
 
I have both and the 30x is nice when you are shooting those pesky 1" dots at 300yds. Once I get my DTA SRS the XRS will be mounted on a 40moa cant so I can dial out to 1500yds+
 
I just picked up an one of the new ERS models from Scott @ Liberty Optics for a smoking good deal. He has great customer service as well. Either way I would give him a look.
 
Still racking the brain. Question, are the zero stop and 10mil turrets worth an extra $200 from the DMR to the ERS? Is the XRS worth the extra $200 over the ERS? I ask those questions from the F/TR perspective, what would the value be in competition and would it be worth the investment. Unfortunately I have no way to get behind these scope before buying but I have no doubt I will like the glass quality.
 
Sold a S&B to fund a lesser scope? That's interesting...

I posted a thread called "from S&B to Bushnell and back again", it highlighted how good of a value the Bushnells really are, even compared to the high dollar S&Bs, which I have owned a handfull of. Looking at a rifle that didnt have optics and another wearing a S&B and limited budget to fund more glass, what does one do? I have been able to be just as competitive shooting with the Bushnell vs the S&B, it boils down to that.
 
So I was a little off on the price difference. Its $376 more for the ERS over the DMR and $128 more for the XRS over the ERS. This is a tough decision, I probably wont be buying another scope for a good long while.
 
I have the ERS on a 6.5x55. I finally got around to messing with the zero stop, the other night. It's kind of a pain in the ass to set, but once you figure it out and do it a few times, it gets much easier (the directions are kind of misleading and don't really help you to visualize what's happening, on a mechanical level. I'm a "gotta see it" type of guy, so....). After messing with it, I started to ask myself the same question; "Is the zero stop/10 mils per rev worth the extra money?". I think it is. I would feel even more strongly about it if I had this scope on my .308, where getting to 1000 yards is going to take 10 mils, or more. Actually, I'm thinking just that; I will likely end up selling my 6-24x ET mildot, which I have on the .308, to help fund another ERS, at some point. Looking at the ERS vs. XRS is probably a matter of personal preference. I don't feel underpowered with the ERS, but that's just me. But I truly believe the zero stop and 10 mils are worth it, especially for a .308.

My .02

John
 
I own both, so I will give you my take. First off, both optics tend to get fairly dark on the top end, the 3.5-21 gets deark around 18-19X and around 26X for the 4.5-30. This does not mean the optics are not "usable" at higher power, spoting and ranging is still possible. I never shoot anywhere near max magnification an any optic,so its not a issue for me. Both are compact and offer a lot of features for the money, but I would opt for the 3.5-21 on a 308, its more than enough.

I making the same decision as the OP, except for a 6.5CM. Could you please expand on the getting dark? Does it get dark on you in normal daylight, or are we talking about in waning sunlight? I ask because, like the OP, I am unlikely to shoot this gun in much other than in broad daylight. Thank you for sharing your experience.
 
Dark refering to the image. Most optics will darken slightly at higher magnification, the objective cant pull in enough light. The 3.5-21 starts around 18-19 power, the image starts to get dark and the eyebox becomes very unforgiving. The 4.5-30 does the same thing, but at around 25x and up.
 
Thank you for your response. I also done plan on getting a hotrod caliber rifle anytime soon and with 308 I have heard you can get lost in your turret real quick. I think I have pretty much decided on an ERS in FDE. Hopefully I'll have the funds in a month or so and can place my order. I need to get some 34mm rings too and the cheapest I have access to is Mark 4's. I would love to get a pair of American rifle M10 rings but $180 is a lot of cash for some rings.

QUOTE=Joop;2709702]I have the ERS on a 6.5x55. I finally got around to messing with the zero stop, the other night. It's kind of a pain in the ass to set, but once you figure it out and do it a few times, it gets much easier (the directions are kind of misleading and don't really help you to visualize what's happening, on a mechanical level. I'm a "gotta see it" type of guy, so....). After messing with it, I started to ask myself the same question; "Is the zero stop/10 mils per rev worth the extra money?". I think it is. I would feel even more strongly about it if I had this scope on my .308, where getting to 1000 yards is going to take 10 mils, or more. Actually, I'm thinking just that; I will likely end up selling my 6-24x ET mildot, which I have on the .308, to help fund another ERS, at some point. Looking at the ERS vs. XRS is probably a matter of personal preference. I don't feel underpowered with the ERS, but that's just me. But I truly believe the zero stop and 10 mils are worth it, especially for a .308.

My .02

John[/QUOTE]
 
Thank you everyone for the advise on this topic. Little update, I found a smoking deal on a Premier 3-15, just a couple hundred more than the .mil price for the ERS, and convinced the wife to let me get it. I actually got a chance to handle one of the Premiers on an M110 here on base and it is a pretty awesome scope. Not that the Bushnell are not awesome scopes, I just probably won't get another chance in the near or distant future to own a scope like a premier.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_00000514.jpg
    IMG_00000514.jpg
    98.4 KB · Views: 5
Last edited:
I've got a decision like yours to make a little ways up the road here for my .260. I figure I'll probably end up going with the ERS unless I have a chance to compare the 2.

Now, H59 or G2DMR? Hmmm...