• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Rifle Scopes Ordered: VALDADA IOR 5.8-40x56 40mm Tactical FFP, MOA/MOA

Beiruty

Beiruty

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Mar 20, 2014
110
0
I just placed an order for VALDADA IOR 5.8-40x56 40mm Tactical FFP, MOA/MOA, Crusader Xtreme X1 illum. Reticle Rings And Sunshade Included
I will try to have a bench review while zeroing at 100 yrds, then when the weather is nice, I will be at 500 yrd range.

Wish me good luck, this is my first IOR and any first scope that I have north of $1,000.
 
r.patrick said:
I've heard they are the best scope ever period bar none.
Click to expand...
That has to be seen. As per spec, that is true. If it is really true, we have to wait and see. German optics is a good start.
 
A buddy of mine here in 29Palms has one. He's more of a precision shooter than a tactical one. So far he's very satisfied with his. He does like the high power stuff.
 
Beiruty said:
I just placed an order for VALDADA IOR 5.8-40x56 40mm Tactical FFP, MOA/MOA, Crusader Xtreme X1 illum. Reticle Rings And Sunshade Included
I will try to have a bench review while zeroing at 100 yrds, then when the weather is nice, I will be at 500 yrd range.

Wish me good luck, this is my first IOR and any first scope that I have north of $1,000.
Click to expand...

Good luck brother ;
Let us know what do you think
I was considering to buy a terminator but then decided to get a Premier Heritage instead,
I really love that Premier glass but,
I even more love the IOR reticle
 
It should be here sometime on Tuesday or so I think. I am still waiting for tracking info.
 
The IOR Crusader scope was just delivered today. The scope cost large sum of money, however, said scope is a monster in size (and spec too). Photos and initial impression will come soon.
 
Here are initial out of the box photos: Note the huge size!





 
Initial feel and inspection of the item is very positive. The only disappointment is that there was no printed manual and all instructions and document came printed out on computer printer.

It is a super luxurious and precision optical device worthy of small desktop publishing job for an instructional booklet and company literature.

Also, there was no battery with the scope, so I could not test the illumination feature out of the box. I would have to run to nearest Walmart to grab one.

I also do recommend to include a microfiber for the glass cleaning and dusting off dirt and spec.
 
Beiruty said:
Initial feel and inspection of the item is very positive. The only disappointment is that there was no printed manual and all instructions and document came printed out on computer printer.

It is a super luxurious and precision optical device worthy of small desktop publishing job for an instructional booklet and company literature.

Also, there was no battery with the scope, so I could not test the illumination feature out of the box. I would have to run to nearest Walmart to grab one.

I also do recommend to include a microfiber for the glass cleaning and dusting off dirt and spec.
Click to expand...

Looks nice, good luck with it.
I'd recommend you get yourself a lenspen for cleaning, fast, portable, and easily cleans all the way to the edge of the glass.
Lenspen LensPen Lens Cleaner NLP-1 B&H Photo Video
 
I just discovered, that there was battery installed, however, I could not see the illuminated dot unless it is on high magnification and the illumination is at 10 or 11 (max). I thought it is full reticule illumination, it is not it is only the floating center 1/4 MOA dot.
 
Remember not to tighten your ring screws to more than one inch-lb., lest you bind up your magnification adjustment.
 
Can anyone confirm if IOR scopes have:
1) full reticule illumination, or
2) floating center dot illumination only
 
Another observation, I noticed barrel distortion at the edges of the optical picture when using high magnifications (24X+). Is that expected or normal? I mean if I look at window of house like 250 yrds away and the roof will be visibly round and not flat, that is what I know is barrel distortion, am I correct?
 
You might need to send a text message to IOR customer service (in Bucharest?) and ask about that.
 
Hello! You do not have to contact Bucharest. Get in contact with Val at valdada.com, he is the US distributor in Colorado and he will take care of you. Or you can contact the dealer that you bought it from. I was with Val over the weekend at the Tulsa gun show where I bought the 6-24x56 with 35mm tube from him. That is the second IOR I own, in November I bought the Recon 4-28x50 40mm tube. Great scope and love the retical. I will right a report on the 6-24 when I get it up and running. It might start out on a 260 Rem. then go on a 300 wm when I get it built. I wish you well with your IOR.
 
The new models with digital illumination only have the center dot illuminated. I also have the 6-24x56. Great scope! Look forward to hearing more. I would contact ior about the distortion your seeing. Val in will take care of you if there is an issue.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
 
My 3.5-18 with digital illumination has full tree illuminated...

Can you comment on scope torque and mag ring binding any more? Am i missing something as i've searched the net for errors on IOR but never found anything related to that and my scope failure "could" be caused by that as mag ring got stuck in certain combination of elevation and power setting?
 
Your right the 3.5-18 has full illum the rest dont as far as I know. I think the binding problem is on the 3.5-18 models where the turrets arent much more than a rings width away from the power ring. Apparently if you tighten the rear ring "too much" it binds and the mag ring wont turn

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
 
It has only center dot illumination.
There is some distortion and I can attribute this to combination of high magnification (18X-24X) and short distance target (50Yrds) and rear diopter adjustment. I guess, now that I have mounted the scope and I can see a full view, it is time for range zeroing and testing. Most likely with real 100 yrd+ target the distortion would be adjusted for barely noticeable. I have to do more testing.
My new IOR crusader is now mounted:




 
I love the scope and the rifle, the only disappointing issue is that the scope moved forward under recoil. The screws were tightened as much as possible. Still I had to unscrew, reposition the scope and tightened a bit more. The net result is the scope has now scratches marks from the underside of the scope. :grumble
As for recoil, there is almost none more than a 223 or 240. Very soft in my book, thank to the amazing factory muzzle brake.No need for gel pad of any kind.
I was able to get initial zeroing with 1" at 50 yrds in 4 rds only. Sweet scope clicks. If the scope did not move I would not have needed to adjusted again.
Total rds fired 20.
Now time to develop some hand loads :hurry: :hurry: :coolgleamA:
Here is the initial zeroing with lowest cost possible brass hunting loads (Herter's select brass):



 
Last edited:
Those rings look like they don't belong on that scope!!! My buddy has that same scope & after looking down thru it at the 1k yd line it made my Razor look like a tasco, well maybe not that cheap but the glass is damn near $1,500 clearer haa! Best glass I have seen so far. I forget what rings my buddy has but they looked like they were another $1,000 ;)
 
You are right those rings are disappointing, but they came free with the scope. And, where can I find better rings with 40mm body? Sratches are now etched on the scope. I do not care too much about the scratches, what I care about is shift in point of impact and shift of zero.
 
I need to reload like 20rds Hornady A-Max 208gr over RL-22. And shoot them again. Let us see if the scope would move. I guess the rings are from factory IOR.
 
Beiruty said:
You are right those rings are disappointing, but they came free with the scope. And, where can I find better rings with 40mm body? Sratches are now etched on the scope. I do not care too much about the scratches, what I care about is shift in point of impact and shift of zero.
Click to expand...

They may have come with the scope, but they're not free now... they cost you the finish on your scope.
You could try rubbing the mount surfaces of the rings with rosin to help with the grip in the short term.

As for real 40mm rings, SWFA has these ARC rings... very nice, but not cheap.
SWFA Mounts, Rings and Bases American Rifle Mounts American Rifle M10 Rings & Mounts American Rifle M10 40mm Rings
 
Holy $hit I just looked up what that scope costs.
Why in the world would you buy that when for the same money you can get an S&B or Steiner or Kahles or 1/2 dozen other alpha scopes?
 
delixe said:
They may have come with the scope, but they're not free now... they cost you the finish on your scope.
You could try rubbing the mount surfaces of the rings with rosin to help with the grip in the short term.

As for real 40mm rings, SWFA has these ARC rings... very nice, but not cheap.
SWFA Mounts, Rings and Bases American Rifle Mounts American Rifle M10 Rings & Mounts American Rifle M10 40mm Rings
Click to expand...

Thanks for the tip. I believe all rings should have their contact area micro-roughed/sanded at the factory.
 
delixe said:
Holy $hit I just looked up what that scope costs.
Why in the world would you buy that when for the same money you can get an S&B or Steiner or Kahles or 1/2 dozen other alpha scopes?
Click to expand...
Per spec, this scope is unique. It is Optics is also alpha grade. Best way is to get it to the range and compare it to S&B. It is my first $1,000+ scope too.
 
delixe said:
Holy $hit I just looked up what that scope costs.
Why in the world would you buy that when for the same money you can get an S&B or Steiner or Kahles or 1/2 dozen other alpha scopes?
Click to expand...

Maybe I missed it in their catalog.
Please point out the 5.8-40 scopes made by those companies you listed.
 
Hello! My Recon came with the same rings and my scope moved also. The instructions say to wipe the screws and clean out the holes with alcohol, I didn't. Afterword I did clean everything and put some rosin on them and that seems to work for now. I torqued them at 17-18 inch pounds.
 
fdkay said:
Maybe I missed it in their catalog.
Please point out the 5.8-40 scopes made by those companies you listed.
Click to expand...

WTF do you need 40x for?
There's nothing you can shoot with 40x that you can't shoot with 25x.
If you really need 40x, buy a March 5-40x56.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falar
delixe said:
WTF do you need 40x for?
There's nothing you can shoot with 40x that you can't shoot with 25x.
If you really need 40x, buy a March 5-40x56.
Click to expand...

Maybe he wanted 40X and didn't realize he needed your permission to buy a fucking scope.
Since when does "need" have anything to do with a fucking hobby?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CLC379 and LG65CM
I agree fdkay! Just gotta accept the fact that no matter what ior puts out from here on out there are going to be these experts bashing them.
Maybe you've been burned by them before or maybe you read a post about them. Either way nice work shitting on this guys thread and equipment.

To the op thanks for showing us your new scope. Im an ior fan as well and gotta say im pretty bummed that those are the rings they send with that badass scope. Come on ior

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: CLC379 and LG65CM
delixe said:
WTF do you need 40x for?
There's nothing you can shoot with 40x that you can't shoot with 25x.
If you really need 40x, buy a March 5-40x56.
Click to expand...
Maybe it was my mistake, maybe I should got the 5-40x56 from March. I guess I can still sell my rig and start all over again if I am not happy. I will do the trick of Alcohol and Rosin if it needs to be. My scope with 4-5 pages of info and no instructions on mounting another negative for such high-end of scope. Am I screwed, nope. I guess IOR Valdada should just do couple improvements on their products and they would be golden. BTW, the Parallax Adjustment works well. I would have also liked more the the full reticule illumination like on the March scope, not just the floating dot. Man up IOR and get a full reticule illumination that works well.
 
Last edited:
Beiruty said:
Another observation, I noticed barrel distortion at the edges of the optical picture when using high magnifications (24X+). Is that expected or normal? I mean if I look at window of house like 250 yrds away and the roof will be visibly round and not flat, that is what I know is barrel distortion, am I correct?
Click to expand...
Just I noticed, at the range, I could not see distortion. I believe, that once the scope is mounted and the eye-relief is set at the correct distance, the scope adjustment (Parallax and rear objective diopter) worked very well.

Tracking worked very well too. Day and night compared to those scope (less than $1K) with internal (25-cents coin) adjustment.
 
Last edited:
Beiruty, now that you have had some time & rounds on this scope what are your thoughts? I'm an old dude and need & appreciate the clear & high magnification. I'd rather invest in this then spend the extra 1-2 k on a spotting scope . . .
 
  • Like
Reactions: CLC379
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

KhaymKhaym
SOLD Valdada IOR Recon 4-28x50 40mm Tube w/ ARC 40mm Rings
Replies
12
Views
1K
KhaymKhaym
KhaymKhaym
blksno
IOR Valdada (still bad?)
Replies
29
Views
5K
redneckbmxer24
R
M
Valdada IOR Precision XT 10-60x56 40mm
Replies
17
Views
2K
VargmatII
V
Glassaholic
Rifle Scopes March FFP 1.5-15x42 MPVO Review and Comparison (w/ Nightforce and Athlon)
Replies
224
Views
16K
WindstormSCR
WindstormSCR
Glassaholic
Rifle Scopes Steiner T6Xi 3-18x56 Review and comparison with NF ATACR 4-16x42, S&B US 3-20x50 and March 4.5-28x52
Replies
115
Views
6K
TheBigCountry
TheBigCountry
Top Bottom
Back