• Winner! Quick Shot Challenge: What’s the dumbest shooting myth you’ve heard?

    View thread

BREAKING: Multiple churches bombed in Sri Lanka. UPDATE: 207 killed

  • Haha
Reactions: TheMammoth
Is it weird that the pakistani dude that runs my favorite gas hole, that I've helped with English, college theses, etc, and general "how to win at America"... I keep trying to convince this dude that halal slaughter and the way I do deer are not ALL that different and he should try some?

Keeps insisting that unless the prayer happens it just ain't gonna be kosher.
 
Thank god. We never would have known, otherwise. Oh wait...God...don’t want to be called a blasphemer.
F76EFA44-F4AC-4952-A3DE-70923BCEF490.gif
 
By command, I will not eat halal meat. By practice, I eat no kosher meat. There are many reasons for this. YouTube has various videos explaining them.

I generally stick to what is considered "clean" food in the Mosaic law, but as it was written thousands of years ago before they made it into this big mess of traditions. The basic idea was pretty simple actually & for the most part rather flexible & straight forward.... before a couple millennia of lawyers got involved. (But one has to make exceptions for bacon and ham from time to time because well...)

However most don't realize how much stuff in packages in the grocery store actually has a basic kosher approval rating symbol on it these days.
 
@TheMammoth

Read this and insert Afghans with Muslims. Then you might get a glimpse of the difference between Sikh and Muzzies.



I am well aware of the difference between a Sikh and a *redacted*. I didn't know he was either, and I honestly don't care. There's enough to shit on him for without it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Veer_G and Bender
No link , but local news service mentioned that Sri Lankan Police say ‘ early indications ‘ are that the
attacks are coordinated retaliation for NZ mosque attack . What a surprise .....

Well if one sides nutters really wanted to make a difference with the other side's nutters, you'd think they'd go after each other instead of innocent civilians. It's almost as if someone is whispering in ears to foment an agenda.

Peace and safety, it's whats for dinner.

Followed by a good helping of sudden destruction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blue Sky Country
Well if one sides nutters really wanted to make a difference with the other side's nutters, you'd think they'd go after each other instead of innocent civilians. It's almost as if someone is whispering in ears to foment an agenda.

Peace and safety, it's whats for dinner.

Followed by a good helping of sudden destruction.

Exactly. If they really want revenge for the Christchurch shooting, they'd find a way to get inside Brandon Tarrant's prison cell and gut him with a fillet knife, slowly and painfully. Targeting civilians is simply the most pussy thing to do. Unless it is done with the sole agenda of terrorizing and forcing compliance from the general population, which is precisely the aim of Islamist extremism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W54/XM-388
Exactly. If they really want revenge for the Christchurch shooting, they'd find a way to get inside Brandon Tarrant's prison cell and gut him with a fillet knife, slowly and painfully. Targeting civilians is simply the most pussy thing to do. Unless it is done with the sole agenda of terrorizing and forcing compliance from the general population, which is precisely the aim of Islamist extremism.
Bullshit...
They'd do it whether there was a Christchurch killing or not.
What was the excuse for Bataclan?
One looks at history going back in their region/influence and sees conquest.
The entire Med is a story book of the "peaceful" influence they've delt for 1400 years.

R
 
Bullshit...
They'd do it whether there was a Christchurch killing or not.
What was the excuse for Bataclan?
One looks at history going back in their region/influence and sees conquest.
The entire Med is a story book of the "peaceful" influence they've delt for 1400 years.

R


That is basically the point of the final sentence in the post. It is sheer aggression, intimidation, and forced conversions to their ideology which motivates their actions.
 
I’m almost more upset with all the people that want to have sanctuary cities and act like your racist just because you notice how even Obama tried to say ft hood wasn’t a Muslim thing. It should be harder for terrorists and illegals to walk around.. not harder for the sheep and sheepdogs.
 
I'm to the point of who cares. I put rags in the same category as rats, wolves, an libturds. They leave me alone, I'll do the same, they what to play fuck around, I'll use the standard SSS that has worked for years upon years. Maybe it's time we allow the weak to get killed off, Mother-nature does it all the time. Gov on every level has assigned a dollar amount to life on every level, could be time for the weak that has caused this, to pay up,...
 
Exactly. If they really want revenge for the Christchurch shooting, they'd find a way to get inside Brandon Tarrant's prison cell and gut him with a fillet knife, slowly and painfully. Targeting civilians is simply the most pussy thing to do. Unless it is done with the sole agenda of terrorizing and forcing compliance from the general population, which is precisely the aim of Islamist extremism.
Brandon Tarrant was a lone lunatic who managed to do allot of damage, as lone lunatics are wont to do because there's really no way to defend against them except to always be armed and ready to draw down (which most of us probably are). They are literally disarming their own people over this and ensuring that the next attack will be equally horrific. Because NZ is run by socialist retards.

Those who attacked in Siri Lanka were part of a large terrorist organization and the attacks were coordinated. They're not crazy. They're ideological fanatics. Not the same thing, but they CAN be hunted down and destroyed. But, that's not really going to stop what's been going on for 1,400 years with only a few pauses and resets.

Apples and oranges.
 
It's somewhat open to interpretation in Acts, but my personal theology is not to call either any person or any food "unholy" or "unclean" unless it is a truly, physical/literal condition. As it pertains to religious dietary laws I'm ambivalent.

I am about as adventurous as it gets. I will try anything, and find myself liking almost everything that doesn't make me sick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: armorpl8chikn
Bullshit...
They'd do it whether there was a Christchurch killing or not.
What was the excuse for Bataclan?
One looks at history going back in their region/influence and sees conquest.
The entire Med is a story book of the "peaceful" influence they've delt for 1400 years.

R

We got tares in the wheat that have all influence over politics, economics, education, and all religions (atheism included). Four wings on one ugly bird that has been building this monster in front of us for millennia. The first builders of cities these tares are. They are there for a purpose and we are to leave them alone.

When all is said and done, every soul that has walked this earth will look back and reflect on what happened and they will see with full knowledge just how easily in ignorance they and their ancestors where played for fools to hate on and kill each other.
 
Was mainly addressing the first part.

R


I see. There, I was just 'splaining what a real act of 'revenge' would be like. In most real life cases of vengeance, as well as in movies, the person seeking revenge usually goes after the direct source of his pain and suffering, and not go Law Abiding Citizen on that person's whole neighborhood. Historically, politically or religiously motivated groups who do the latter lose support from the public very quickly.