Wells Fargo sues Gunwerks in Federal Court

Status
Not open for further replies.
#5
Kinda always wondered how they went from this dinky little company to what they offer without a large investment - and their guns were way overpriced to get a broad customer base.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seymour Fish
#6
Maybe not anti gun games- it says that Gunwerks applied for and looks like they got a $3M grant and a $3M loan to expand their facilities that's a lot of money. The article says they defaulted on a Wells Fargo loan and that they stopped paying sales tax, which if true would be pretty convincing evidence that they are financially insolvent which wouldn't have anything to do with anti gun politics.

I hope they make it, besides that I hate to see it when good gun companies go under, Phil Velayo and Caylen Wojcik both worked for them and they're as good guys as they get.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: alwaywatchyoursix, Eric_F, silentheart and 4 others
#12
I'm not taking Wells Fargo's side- I agree they're a bad bank and I think nobody else who's posted in this thread is taking the banks side. I just think that none of us know what the real story is, but everyone knows nobody gets away with not paying their taxes so if they stopped paying sales taxes to Wyoming, they had real serious problems beyond whatever their situation with Wells Fargo was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hollowoutadime, silentheart and IW21
#13
Seemed like nice guys ,I watched quite a a few of there tv episodes. But there gun systems was way over priced. Seems like they where trying for upper end clients, but There's only so many of those .hope they make, might be pretty tough in this economy right now
 
  • Like
Reactions: seansmd
#15
This news should come as a surprise but really doesn't. When you think about all the R&D that had to go into developing the Revic scope, Kestrel killer, rangefinders, etc., it all had to add up. I haven't ever seen any of their equipment being used at matches. It seems like they have a bunch of great innovation, but that doesn't mean squat if it doesn't sell. I'm definitely not taking Wells Fargo side because of their own shady business practices, but this doesn't look good. It's really unfortunate if this is the end for Gunwerks. They definitely had great vision and innovative products, and it will be unfortunate to lose that ingenuity.
Hopefully Phil's ties weren't too deep with Gunwerks and he will be able to weather this storm. Of all the things Gunwerks might have screwed up, hiring Phil as a trainer and representative wasn't one of them. Either way, he should be able to find gainful employment with other companies who could use his service; just sucks he just bought a house.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike4837, reximus and BLKWLFK9
#17
Doesn't seem to be an anti-gun anything nor are there any national implications for this case. This is pretty run-of-the-mill stuff with little in terms of expectation of new case law resultant from any judicial ruling.

Federal court is the appropriate venue because diversity of citizenship exists (parties of the suit are from different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 USD).

This looks like a case in which a bank wants to recover money they loaned to a borrower and it appears that Gunwerks borrowed too heavily and then violated their agreements and debt covenants with Wells Fargo. They fell too far behind on their loans and ended up owing too much money to other creditors, including the government. Furthermore, if WF is to be believed, they removed their deposits from Wells Fargo in violation of the agreements to keep their accounts with WF.

I really don't see anything alarming here except that Gunwerks is likely going to be under different ownership soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alwaywatchyoursix, silentheart, Ravenworks and 4 others
#18
m1match said:
Maybe not anti gun games- it says that Gunwerks applied for and looks like they got a $3M grant and a $3M loan to expand their facilities that's a lot of money. The article says they defaulted on a Wells Fargo loan and that they stopped paying sales tax, which if true would be pretty convincing evidence that they are financially insolvent which wouldn't have anything to do with anti gun politics.

I hope they make it, besides that I hate to see it when good gun companies go under, Phil Velayo and Caylen Wojcik both worked for them and they're as good guys as they get.
Click to expand...
The owners will blame the patsy cfo and walk away clean. 6 million in loans and grants and a bunch of tax money received through sales sounds like a damn good score to me. You gotta sell a shit load of gun stuff to earn 6 million plus in profit. The owner realized that and decided to take the money instead of working the rest of his life to repay the loans. The owner can now retire comfortably with the money he stole and enjoy life. They should jail his ass until he repays every dime he owes Uncle Sam including the grant money. Otherwise us taxpayers just took it up the ass again. Smdh
 
  • Like
Reactions: Triple BB, Ravenworks and candyx
#19
BadAccountant said:
Doesn't seem to be an anti-gun anything nor are there any national implications for this case. This is pretty run-of-the-mill stuff with little in terms of expectation of new case law resultant from any judicial ruling.

Federal court is the appropriate venue because diversity of citizenship exists (parties of the suit are from different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 USD).

This looks like a case in which a bank wants to recover money they loaned to a borrower and it appears that Gunwerks borrowed too heavily and then violated their agreements and debt covenants with Wells Fargo. They fell too far behind on their loans and ended up owing too much money to other creditors, including the government. Furthermore, if WF is to be believed, they removed their deposits from Wells Fargo in violation of the agreements to keep their accounts with WF.

I really don't see anything alarming here except that Gunwerks is likely going to be under different ownership soon.
Click to expand...
I agree but it should be in federal criminal not civil.
 
#21
I wonder how much the coronavirus played into this. Seems like they might have made an ill timed expansion push.

Given the nature of their customer base - well heeled hunters with more money than time, no hunt this season = no purchase.
 
#22
physguy88 said:
I wonder how much the coronavirus played into this. Seems like they might have made an ill timed expansion push.

Given the nature of their customer base - well heeled hunters with more money than time, no hunt this season = no purchase.
Click to expand...
My guess would be none. I don't think their financial problems happened within the last three months that train left the station way before anyone ever heard of coronavirus....IMO
 
  • Like
Reactions: silentheart, Ravenworks, Steel head and 3 others
#23
I hate banks. They don’t build those huge edifices with their own money. The money comes from their customers/victims. However Gunwerks aren’t innocent victims of predatory lenders. They screwed everyone they possibly could as long, hard, and often as they could. They took 3mil from WF, another 3mil from the Government, another stack from collecting taxes they never paid. They have employees that won’t get paid for their labor and customers that paid for products they’ll never receive. You can believe the owner isn’t gonna loose his home or car like the employees. No way, he’s hiding out sipping on drinks with little umbrellas in them counting that money. So don’t cry to much for that POS. Save them tears for the employees living from paycheck to paycheck and the customers who are waiting on stuff they paid for that’ll never come. Just saying
 
  • Like
Reactions: rookie7, Seymour Fish, chuey and 4 others
#26
BadAccountant said:
Doesn't seem to be an anti-gun anything nor are there any national implications for this case. This is pretty run-of-the-mill stuff with little in terms of expectation of new case law resultant from any judicial ruling.

Federal court is the appropriate venue because diversity of citizenship exists (parties of the suit are from different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 USD).

This looks like a case in which a bank wants to recover money they loaned to a borrower and it appears that Gunwerks borrowed too heavily and then violated their agreements and debt covenants with Wells Fargo. They fell too far behind on their loans and ended up owing too much money to other creditors, including the government. Furthermore, if WF is to be believed, they removed their deposits from Wells Fargo in violation of the agreements to keep their accounts with WF.

I really don't see anything alarming here except that Gunwerks is likely going to be under different ownership soon.
Click to expand...
Clearly, you have a blind eye to Wells Fargo business practices. They were the third highest foreclosing bank in the housing crisis that started in 2008. They got shitloads of money to help restructure a lot of those loans and all they did was pocket it.

The City should bear some responsibility here too. A $3M grant? With no due diligence about how this was going to benefit them, they just want more businesses to come in so they handed off $3M in a grant of taxpayer money? In conjunction with this, neither did the bank do any research on how this could work.

Lastly yes, Gunwerks is ultimately responsible. Did they take advantage of any business consultants? Financial consultants? Engineering/Technical consultants? Before Wells Fargo jumps in and tries to take everything, there needs to be some serious sit-down negotiation as to where this should be going. Not like Wells Fargo to give a shit about customers. If they do take anything, they also need to split it with the City, as they put out $3m as well. Or wherever the grant money came from. This had to be a situation where Gunwerks at some point quit working with the city or state and Wells Fargo. Or maybe Wells Fargo just wants it all.

FWIW, hell yeah I've got an axe to grind with Wells Fargo. I got a VA loan through them and two months later I'm told it won't work out and if I don't refinance with a FannyMae they'll jack me out of my house. They knowingly wrote up the VA loan with the house undervalued. After they told me they had that issue straightened out.

Because at the time I didn't have a quick option, I had to do that. I then spent the next six months trying to get my VA funding fee back. So, fuck Wells Fargo. With a big stick. With little busted off branches on it. Repeatedly.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Captrjc, rookie7, Amanda4461 and 3 others
#27
Hi,

So according to ATF Manufacturing Records:

2018: 983 Rifles
2017: 782 Rifles
2016: 702 Rifles

Guys, just based off those numbers and the average price of their rifles there is just no way the banks and sales tax should not have been paid and paid in timely manner.

Are banks HORRIBLE? YES.....
Do banks close on unpaid loans everyday from damn near every industry sector? YES...
Do banks "entice" companies to take out more loans than they could payback per the finance reports? YES...
Do banks "REQUIRE" you to take those loan amounts? NO...
Do banks have the right to recover their assets? Yes
Do business OWNERS (not an employee) have the obligation to pay their business loans? ABSOLUTELY...

Sincerely,
Theis
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThePretzel, Shootin25, armorpl8chikn and 27 others
#29
Not sure how many read the article. It mentions sales tax quit being paid late 2018. Every state is different, so I can only speak from mine but when you exceed X amount of sales tax revenue, you have to pay it monthly. Also sounds like the 3m grant was for the facility, which the tax payers still own technically. Gunwerks was only renting it. Did you catch the accruing monthly interest payment of 20k? Wholly crap, that’s a lot of interest. The article also reads they sold off equipment that was being used as collateral, along with moving cash. Not mention other creditors they refused to disclose. What a mess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: silentheart, Ankeny and THEIS
#32
Gunwerks did something most of us could only dream of. They took a well written business plan and robbed a bank, the government and the tax man. Nobody involved will see the inside of a jail either. They’ll stand there with their bare face hanging out and swear they don’t know what happened to all that money. Hell, they might even cry for the cameras and talk of having lost everything. Then get into a luxury car and go back to a plush home. They won’t sell their stuff to pay their employees for work performed or refund customers money for products they paid for and will never receive. Like someone else said this didn’t happen over night or over a few months, no sir. Gunwerks bled that money off slowly so not to draw attention to the scam and to give them a little deniability when the shit hit the fan. You can bet that money is safely hidden away until this mess is over. The government needs to squeeze the bastards like they do dead beat dads. Lock that ass up in the booty farm until the government and customers money magically reappears. Let Wells Fargo learn their lesson the hard way just like they do to their customers. That should leave the owner at least a million bucks, but possibly more. I guarantee you the owner would be more than happy to come up with the money to forego being passed around like a bag of chips at a pot party. Treat him like the criminal he is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rookie7, silentheart, Steel+Killer and 3 others
#33
physguy88 said:
I wonder how much the coronavirus played into this. Seems like they might have made an ill timed expansion push.

Given the nature of their customer base - well heeled hunters with more money than time, no hunt this season = no purchase.
Click to expand...
Well since they stopped paying sales tax in 2018....I don't think beer was a factor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Steel+Killer
#34
THEIS said:
Hi,

So according to ATF Manufacturing Records:

2018: 983 Rifles
2017: 782 Rifles
2016: 702 Rifles

Guys, just based off those numbers and the average price of their rifles there is just no way the banks and sales tax should not have been paid and paid in timely manner.

Are banks HORRIBLE? YES.....
Do banks close on unpaid loans everyday from damn near every industry sector? YES...
Do banks "entice" companies to take out more loans than they could payback per the finance reports? YES...
Do banks "REQUIRE" you to take those loan amounts? NO...
Do banks have the right to recover their assets? Yes
Do business OWNERS (not an employee) have the obligation to pay their business loans? ABSOLUTELY...

Sincerely,
Theis
Click to expand...
Would those manufacturing numbers include their $800 GRB action?
 
#36
  • Like
Reactions: Secant
#37
candyx said:
If he gets away with it good for him he should share his tricks with others. Bust your ass and take huge risks and then you have to give the government 35% off the top so Pelosi can give it to some illegal alien so he can stay home and fuck his wife all day while you sweat to keep up.
Click to expand...

Except the employees you fuck over......
 
  • Like
Reactions: silentheart, Steel+Killer, Steel head and 1 other person
#38
Dthomas3523 said:
Except the employees you fuck over......
Click to expand...

Hi,

AND Customers!!!!
Yet the end users of products in this industry somehow look at long lead times as a sign of quality and praise...yet this exact situation is why such crazy lead times should be looked down upon.

Sincerely,
Theis
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clownbuster, Shootin25, rookie7 and 8 others
#39
I doubt his initial intent was to defraud anyone. He likely made poor decisions, poorly timed.

I also would not jump to concluding criminal intent, fraud or that owner is prospering. It could be the case but might not.

Those who make unfounded accusations are actually sharing insight into their character and motivations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bender, Captrjc, MarinePMI and 6 others
#40
sandwarrior said:
The City should bear some responsibility here too. A $3M grant? With no due diligence about how this was going to benefit them, they just want more businesses to come in so they handed off $3M in a grant of taxpayer money?
Click to expand...
Something to note here; local/city grants are VERY rarely made in cash... they're almost always in the form of taxes (usually property) that won't be owed. I can't speak to this particular situation, but that's what I saw when my then-girlfriend worked for a small-ish city in Texas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lariat, spife7980 and RTH1800
#41
candyx said:
If he gets away with it good for him he should share his tricks with others. Bust your ass and take huge risks and then you have to give the government 35% off the top so Pelosi can give it to some illegal alien so he can stay home and fuck his wife all day while you sweat to keep up.
Click to expand...
No real secret in that. Any attorney could do help and keep you out of jail.
 
#43
jcmullis2 said:
The owners will blame the patsy cfo and walk away clean. 6 million in loans and grants and a bunch of tax money received through sales sounds like a damn good score to me. You gotta sell a shit load of gun stuff to earn 6 million plus in profit. The owner realized that and decided to take the money instead of working the rest of his life to repay the loans. The owner can now retire comfortably with the money he stole and enjoy life. They should jail his ass until he repays every dime he owes Uncle Sam including the grant money. Otherwise us taxpayers just took it up the ass again. Smdh
Click to expand...

this is really an overly simplified view on business.
Now I agree if a company/ceo/owner takes the loans the grants the investments and funnels it into their personal accounts and skips town. Absolutely lock them up. That is fraud.

that doesn’t appear to be the case here be cause the R&D was done the product line was created the marketing was done and they were actively selling their products and best I know keep up with their sales.

this “simply” looks like a case where business leadership over estimated the availability in the market place and sold a bank on the same vision.

companies fail. In this case the product seems generally sound and depending on the internal structure and condition which none of us know, a company will come in scoop it up for pennies on the dollar and move forward without the burden of the original R&D
 
  • Like
Reactions: RTH1800
#44
BurnOut said:
Something to note here; local/city grants are VERY rarely made in cash... they're almost always in the form of taxes (usually property) that won't be owed. I can't speak to this particular situation, but that's what I saw when my then-girlfriend worked for a small-ish city in Texas.
Click to expand...
Normally, that's true. This was a grant, per the article, and that is cash. Often funneled all the way from the Federal Gov't.

I gotta ask too, how do you get someone's business records? Isn't that just like business tax return? I did not know the public has access to that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IronOperator87 and reximus
#46
Regardless of the personalities and reputations of the players involved, my own take on stuff like this is pretty straight forward. If you take the loan out, you owe it back. Business, student, mortgage...if you owe, you owe. The choice to take someone else's money comes with some significant strings attached, but it is a choice with all the responsibility it entails.
 
#49
DJL2 said:
Regardless of the personalities and reputations of the players involved, my own take on stuff like this is pretty straight forward. If you take the loan out, you owe it back. Business, student, mortgage...if you owe, you owe. The choice to take someone else's money comes with some significant strings attached, but it is a choice with all the responsibility it entails.
Click to expand...

This is certainly true. But remember when you go to an institution like a bank for a business loan it is different than say a subsidized student loan.

that student loan comes with very minimal barriers to obtain it. Basically just proof that you couldn’t pay for the tuition on your own. (Over simplified yes) and the rates on return of the subsidized loan are low typically under market value. So you owe what you owe

the bank is effectively partnering with you. They can say no for any reason they can evaluate the risk and set the rate and terms accordingly. So no that doesn’t give people the right to stiff them, but is a business fails that bank had the opportunity to vet the idea, the people the market And sometimes the banks get it wrong and they will gut stuck eating it.

our economy thrives off upstart small business. It is important that we continue to allow the flow of finance for that to happen. Overall the banks aren’t hurting or going under as a result of their bad guesses. He’ll go back to the 90s and you have Chase bank restructuring all of their loans to President Trump because they over leveraged themselves and he was defaulting. They couldn’t take that big of a hit so they restructured and it kept both parties afloat.


we don’t have a full story but that very well may have already happened hear and they still couldn’t make good on it or Wells Fargo didn’t feel it was worth their time, or flat out the bank realized they own something of value and if the owners defaulted guess what they could suck it up and flip it for more.
again when you get a loan especially if that size you are effectively taking on a new business partner...the bank. And that business partner has more power and resources than you do. And if you allow them to have the leverage they may just push you out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lariat, bachelorjack and reximus
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

PatMiles
Judges Reject Washington State’s Effort to Shut Down Federal Deportation Flights.
Replies
26
Views
2K
TexPatriot
T
PatMiles
BREAKING: Trump to Sue Joe Biden’s DOJ Over Unprecedented Mar-a-Lago Raid for $100 Million
Replies
13
Views
975
Atomic_Lobster
Atomic_Lobster
lash
In Another Shocking Revelation…
Replies
17
Views
1K
lash
lash
Dead Eye Dick
So blasted Typical
Replies
7
Views
746
sirhrmechanic
sirhrmechanic
Death From A Distance
GOP Lawsuits Challenge Overseas Ballots In Key Swing States
Replies
3
Views
357
lonegunman762x51
lonegunman762x51
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts