Look, I am about as anti-democracy as anybody you will find, but that doesn't change the facts about the legitimacy of government. There are plenty of legitimate non democracies, even ones I detest and would never support, but governments depend on being seen as legitimate for their continued existence. An election being overturned by nine unelected judges, likely in a 5-4 vote, is not good for legitimacy. Hence my earlier comment that in a case like this it benefits the lawyers not to keep any information secret, because only a groundswell of public opinion could lead to an overturn that would be seen as legitimate. I'm not saying I like it any more than you do, but it is the fundamental understanding of power in politics.
Sorry if I have offended so many on here by giving my analysis. It is how I honestly see it, not how I wish it to be.