• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Gunsmithing Thread locker when and when not to use

jackinfl

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Dec 19, 2008
836
164
Fort lauderdale, Fl
I have some questions regarding thread lockers. I was taught years ago every screw gets blue loctite. I have since evolved and began reading the instructions... Some manufacturers say just use torque, some say to use blue loctite some say use the vibra tite products. Let's talk scope cap screws and Pistol red dot mounting. Let's keep in mind duty related firearms that will sit in cars for miles and miles of good vibrations prior to being deployed.

Is it the thread of the screw that dictates the need of thread locking compound? Fine VS Coarse? Is it the amount of torque the head of the screw can take when removing. If you use thread locker and torque it in at 12 in. LB., it's going to take more than that to remove it and defeat the thread locker.

Thanks, I really appreciate learning from this group. There are so many extremely talented people here, @Terry Cross @LongRifles Inc. @MikeRTacOps and many more.
 
I have some questions regarding thread lockers. I was taught years ago every screw gets blue loctite. I have since evolved and began reading the instructions... Some manufacturers say just use torque, some say to use blue loctite some say use the vibra tite products. Let's talk scope cap screws and Pistol red dot mounting. Let's keep in mind duty related firearms that will sit in cars for miles and miles of good vibrations prior to being deployed.

Is it the thread of the screw that dictates the need of thread locking compound? Fine VS Coarse? Is it the amount of torque the head of the screw can take when removing. If you use thread locker and torque it in at 12 in. LB., it's going to take more than that to remove it and defeat the thread locker.

Thanks, I really appreciate learning from this group. There are so many extremely talented people here, @Terry Cross @LongRifles Inc. @MikeRTacOps and many more.


I spent a great deal of time researching this very subject 15 or so years ago. That rabbit hole eventually leads to an introduction to a guy named Jerome Sailing up in the Pac North West. His job at the time was to do nothing more than design fasteners used in the airplane industry.

Screws and bolts work because they are a spring. The tension (tensile) is created because the helical feature on the screw mates with the opposing side and the fastener begins to elongate (grow in length) as the rotation increases. This is because the head of the fastener serves as the point where all the tensile load originates from.

Where things start to fall apart:

Were working with materials as an end-user that we don't always understand or even know what they are. Steels vary and so does aluminum. 7075 AL behaves much, much differently than 6061. A steel screw can easily deform the pocket that the head registers off of and this will mess with a given torque value. This is amplified by screws that have a small surface area under the head, such as the typical 8-40 screw used to attach an M700 base.

Next is the amount of torque applied to the fastener. The real goal here is not to torque the thing to a value of "X" but to turn it far enough for the fastener to elongate and apply the tensile load without going too far and causing it to yield or fail. It doesn't take much either.

Case in point: ARP (Automotive Racing Products) makes fasteners for race car stuff. Engines, etc... Rod bolts are a critical component to any engine. For a 2000 series bolt to apply the correct load it needs to grow .006" to .0065" in overall length when tightened. Less than 2 sheets of notebook paper. That's a fastener that sees an absurd about of abuse for millions of duty cycles. Now compare that to a 6-48 base screw.

Last, the pitch. Thread pitches are important because it has to do with the materials being used. Aluminum and plastics are weaker than steel. So, the thread pitch in those types of alloys are typically coarser. This is because there is a greater difference between the root diameter and the major diameter. The cross-section of the thread increases which spreads the loading forces over a greater surface area. The quality of the surface finish on the fastener hear matters big time as well. A shitty thread will chew on an opposing thread made of AL or plastic. It doesnt take long for the screw to erode the flanks of the internal threads and weaken it.

The bad side of this is that the root diameter of the fastener is also affected. A 6-32 screw for example is probably one of the worst as the root diameter is quite small. This means you have to be more careful as it's an easy screw to ruin or break. It's one reason why 6-32 thread taps are notorious for failing at a rate that exceeds a lot of others. It's just a shit design because the tool lacks the cross-section to support it properly as it does the work. The screws suffer the same condition. On that note know that there's a variety of ways to create a thread. Forming and rolling is always prefered when possible as it has higher material density and that makes for a stronger part. Cutting a thread is probably the weakest of all of them.

Thread lockers:

Thread lockers are basically sugar. Under pressure, the fluid transforms into a crystalline-like structure that will grow, fill a void, and exert some pressure. That pressure is what makes them stay put and why they require more effort to remove. It's not glue or adhesive. It's important to understand that. The bad side of LT is that it can break down if exposed to heat, excessive strain, or certain chemicals. It's why it is never used on things like head bolts, studs, or connecting rod bolts on an engine. Those depend on preloading the fastener during assembly.

All this is great, but what does it mean?

If you have 6-48 or 8-40 base screws, a dab of blue is not a bad thing. IF your base lacks any kind of lug feature that transfers recoil directly to the base it is a good idea to periodically check your screws AND I would recommend replacing them once a year if its on a light gun chambered in something big and nasty. (EDIT: Assuming this is a gun you shoot a lot, a safe queen is likely going to be fine although it never hurts to PM your stuff) I have personally witnessed scopes and bases flying off of rifles at events because of recoil-induced failure. None of those guns had a keyed base that interfaced with the receiver. They merely flopped the base to the top of the receiver and relied on the screws to hold everything together. Remember what I said: Screws work by acting as a spring in a tensile type load. During recoil, the load changes, and its also being applied at a right angle to the screw. Shearing forces are a completely different animal and it's really not how a puny 6-48 should be used when heavy optics are being attached to it. Adding the mass of rings and the riflescope works against you because it is now the job of those little guys to accelerate and decelerate the optic and all the related parts n pieces every time the gun goes bang. Rings are usually different because they work in tension. There are typically no shear loads applied or they are quite small. A typical STENAG base/ring setup might be the exception but those screws are typically pretty big and have plenty of cross-section to tolerate the loads being applied. Those rings are also often lugged so that they'll key into the base itself.

Base screws: The math that Jerome and I did suggests that the material we used at Nesika for guard screws could not exceed 40 inch-pounds. That was 303 stainless. Carbon steel (8620 or 1018 is very common) will tolerate a higher load. 50-60 inch-pounds seems to be the industry standard here. I would not recommend Loctite just because it's going to eventually lead to problems. These screws only work in tension as they should. Recoil is handled by the lug on the receiver and the well in the stock.

We can run down the whole list of possible parts, but this covers the big stuff.

Hope it helped.
 
Last edited:
Basically if the gun is going to be subjected to constant or frequent vibrations I will threadlock everything unless it is specifically contraindicated.
Educate yourself before blasting everything with threadlocker though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Average guy
You are probably better off replacing fasteners than using threadlocker. Its common in aircraft and other high precision environments to replace the fastner every time you take it off the part.

Like Chad said the fasteners stretch , which means they are yeilding. Depending on the material, heat treating, ect. the elasticity of the material may or may not return. So the next time you put it in there it will not have the same spring effect which is the force holding the shit together. You will have to apply more force to stretch the fastner futher to get it tight. This increases the chance of the fastener failing. This will jack up your torque numbers.

If you ever get a chance to take a metalurgy class, I would highly recommend it. Its facinating how different materials react and even the same materials with different tempers, heat treating or extreme cooling.

As someone who repairs small arms, there are few things I hate more than people who slather threadlocker on everything. Broken and chipped tools, having to drill out fastners and spending time cleaning up the mess from the shot. Not to mention firearm manufactures tend to not use quality Grade 8/9 US made fastners so they fail much easier. They get charged a whole lot more than anyone else.
 
OP - you mentioned you were taught to put blue on basically everything.

You ever had a something come loose when using it?
 
All thread lockers are not equal nor do they function in a similar fashion.

There are a variety of Loctite style thread fasteners that require anaerobic, i.e. reduced / absent oxygen presence, conditions to cure and form an adhesive bond once the fastener is mated to its part. The purple / blue styles are designed for simple disassembly without use of heat application, whereas the red style often will require ~500 deg F of heat application to break the adhesive polymer down.

There are polymer compression liquids, brand names like Nylok etc applied to one side of fastener threads to create a counter pressure force to prevent vibrations to loosen fasteners from their mate. These are generally applied in a commercial setting to fasteners.

Vibra-tite VC-3 style are similar to Nylok products except available for the average joe to apply to fasteners; in contrast to Loctite variants where one color of adhesive is applied, then fasteners mated, Vibra-tite is applied to the fastener to cure / dry THEN the fastener is secured to its mate. Vibra-tite style products do not require heat to release the frictional bond and are meant for use / reuse so this style / or Nylok is commonly applied to rear sight set screws to allow for adjustment of the sight after assembly; unlike Loctite products.

There are ceramic based adhesive products such as Rocksett, that mfg's commonly include for assembly of muzzle brakes / suppressors since the adhesive is stable to 2000 deg F. However simple water immersion, not heat, is employed to dissolve the adhesive for parts disassembly.

Obviously, anti-seize products are the anti-thesis of applying fastener adhering products.

An example of Nylok, note the application is not circumferential on the fastener threads rather it acts like a soft hydraulic compression (spring-like as LongRifles discussed); Vibra-tite is best applied in a similar fashion.

A few years ago, I made this chart as a self-reminder and interesting to choose fasteners based on length and TPI when an option as you can see length of fastener thread engagement changes quite dramatically, usually for the better, as TPI increases.

M&P9 Set Screw with Red Nylok  copy.png
Screen Shot 2021-03-09 at 6.45.28 PM.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: E. Bryant
Chad has given a very good explanation. At work we use torque turn and hydraulic tension in many applications to apply obscene torque to fasteners. It takes a lot to get 200+ Ksi fasteners to act as a spring. The engineering that goes into a simple washer used in a high load bolted joint is impressive. We typically have the loctite boys around once a year to remind us of how we are actually supposed to use their products.
As Chad pointed out one of the easiest things to do is allow the fastener to apply the clamp load and make another feature take the shear load.
Kyle
 
Like Chad said the fasteners stretch , which means they are yeilding.

Incorrect - "standard" fasteners are not designed to yield when properly torqued. Modern "torque-to-yield" fasteners obviously are, hence the name.

Theoretically, a properly-torqued standard fastener has an infinite life. Look at the guys who change tires on their track cars once a weekend for years; those lugs might have hundreds of tightening cycles, and none of those have degraded the fasteners' performance. Which brings us from theory to practice; what eventually happens in the real world to even properly-designed fasteners that threads will gall or become otherwise damaged. Even threads which are not damaged may eventually provide an every-changing relationship between torque and preload, which ain't good. This has traditionally been the reason for not reusing fasteners in aerospace applications.

Torque-to-yield (TTY) fasteners are not used in any firearm with which I'm familiar (although I wouldn't be surprised in the least if they've snuck into some modern .mil stuff because a defense contractor got bored). In automotive applications, they tend to be a specialty bolt to control this yielding process (read: not break when torqued a good quarter-turn past the yield point). Interestingly, many TTY fasteners can be reused if one does not attempt to make them yield on the following cycle(s). This is not endorsed, but it's been done enough where engineers cannot flatly deny that it can be done (although we'll still mumble something under our breath as we walk away).

In guns, so many fasteners are complete clusterfucks (Chad went into several examples) and proper installation techniques simply don't apply, and instead we use band-aids like threadlockers (or just say "fuck it" and start gluing parts together).
 
You are probably better off replacing fasteners than using threadlocker. Its common in aircraft and other high precision environments to replace the fastner every time you take it off the part.

Like Chad said the fasteners stretch , which means they are yeilding. Depending on the material, heat treating, ect. the elasticity of the material may or may not return. So the next time you put it in there it will not have the same spring effect which is the force holding the shit together. You will have to apply more force to stretch the fastner futher to get it tight. This increases the chance of the fastener failing. This will jack up your torque numbers.

If you ever get a chance to take a metalurgy class, I would highly recommend it. Its facinating how different materials react and even the same materials with different tempers, heat treating or extreme cooling.

As someone who repairs small arms, there are few things I hate more than people who slather threadlocker on everything. Broken and chipped tools, having to drill out fastners and spending time cleaning up the mess from the shot. Not to mention firearm manufactures tend to not use quality Grade 8/9 US made fastners so they fail much easier. They get charged a whole lot more than anyone else.


I think you may have missed this part:

Next is the amount of torque applied to the fastener. The real goal here is not to torque the thing to a value of "X" but to turn it far enough for the fastener to elongate and apply the tensile load without going too far and causing it to yield or fail. It doesn't take much either.
 
I think you may have missed this part:

Next is the amount of torque applied to the fastener. The real goal here is not to torque the thing to a value of "X" but to turn it far enough for the fastener to elongate and apply the tensile load without going too far and causing it to yield or fail. It doesn't take much either.
I appologize if I was not more specific or got the terminology wrong. By yield i mean stretch. The concern is with fatigue and cycles that effect the fastner. The fastner will work harden and become brittle as it stretches and then tries to return to non stressed state. Atleast thats how it was explained to me.
 
I appologize if I was not more specific or got the terminology wrong. By yield i mean stretch. The concern is with fatigue and cycles that effect the fastner. The fastner will work harden and become brittle as it stretches and then tries to return to non stressed state. Atleast thats how it was explained to me.

There will be no work hardening without plastic deformation, and theoretically there should be no plastic deformation in a properly-torqued non-TTY fastener. In practice, we might see a very small amount of stretch during the first full torque cycle if the fastener is not properly stress-relieved or otherwise conditioned (similar to a spring taking a "set" during its first full cycle), but nothing should move after that.

If you had a high-quality bolt and an equally high-quality nut (something from Holo-Krome or Unbrako, or one of 'dem fancy ARP head studs), you could run torque cycles until your arms fall off, or until the threads get bunged up from whatever random contamination makes its way into the threads. Once again, there are countless examples of this in the automotive world, because that industry (both OE and aftermarket) is pretty darn good about designing fasteners in a safe and economical fashion. (As an FYI, stuff exposed to extreme thermal events is a whole 'nother story, which is why the industry occasionally stubs its collective toe on things like exhaust manifold bolts).

But what happens in firearms is that some dimwit designs a threaded joint that has about 1-1/2 threads of actual engagement, and the bolt/screw is way too small, and the internally threaded part is way too soft or the starting thread is poorly formed or whatever, and the joint is put into single sheer, and then some hamfist comes along and tries to torque using the German spec (Gütentiet). And yeah, something sure as fuck is going to yield in that situation. But that doesn't mean that it should, or that it would have if designed and implemented correctly.
 
No sir, but I have stripped heads trying to move parts around.
Late to the show.

Good stuff above.

I will add: Anytime a thread locker is used or suspected to be used, a soldering gun can be the tool of choice. Place the tip of the heat element on the head of the fastener and heat on High for about 10-15 seconds. Heat will soften the thread locker adhesive and should allow removal.

Exception is RockSet for obvious reasons.

./
 
We tried a soldering iron but for some reason we still couldn’t get these 3” bolts to move with an 1 1/2” impact. Our tool of choice is a rose bud! Just kidding, please don’t take a rose bud to your scope rings.
Kyle
 
  • Like
Reactions: Terry Cross
I use blue Loctite on the scope base screws and suppressor QD mounts. Use a torque wrench for the ring screws. Haven't had any come loose yet.
 
I spent a great deal of time researching this very subject 15 or so years ago. That rabbit hole eventually leads to an introduction to a guy named Jerome Sailing up in the Pac North West. His job at the time was to do nothing more than design fasteners used in the airplane industry.

Screws and bolts work because they are a spring. The tension (tensile) is created because the helical feature on the screw mates with the opposing side and the fastener begins to elongate (grow in length) as the rotation increases. This is because the head of the fastener serves as the point where all the tensile load originates from.

Where things start to fall apart:

Were working with materials as an end-user that we don't always understand or even know what they are. Steels vary and so does aluminum. 7075 AL behaves much, much differently than 6061. A steel screw can easily deform the pocket that the head registers off of and this will mess with a given torque value. This is amplified by screws that have a small surface area under the head, such as the typical 8-40 screw used to attach an M700 base.

Next is the amount of torque applied to the fastener. The real goal here is not to torque the thing to a value of "X" but to turn it far enough for the fastener to elongate and apply the tensile load without going too far and causing it to yield or fail. It doesn't take much either.

Case in point: ARP (Automotive Racing Products) makes fasteners for race car stuff. Engines, etc... Rod bolts are a critical component to any engine. For a 2000 series bolt to apply the correct load it needs to grow .006" to .0065" in overall length when tightened. Less than 2 sheets of notebook paper. That's a fastener that sees an absurd about of abuse for millions of duty cycles. Now compare that to a 6-48 base screw.

Last, the pitch. Thread pitches are important because it has to do with the materials being used. Aluminum and plastics are weaker than steel. So, the thread pitch in those types of alloys are typically coarser. This is because there is a greater difference between the root diameter and the major diameter. The cross-section of the thread increases which spreads the loading forces over a greater surface area. The quality of the surface finish on the fastener hear matters big time as well. A shitty thread will chew on an opposing thread made of AL or plastic. It doesnt take long for the screw to erode the flanks of the internal threads and weaken it.

The bad side of this is that the root diameter of the fastener is also affected. A 6-32 screw for example is probably one of the worst as the root diameter is quite small. This means you have to be more careful as it's an easy screw to ruin or break. It's one reason why 6-32 thread taps are notorious for failing at a rate that exceeds a lot of others. It's just a shit design because the tool lacks the cross-section to support it properly as it does the work. The screws suffer the same condition. On that note know that there's a variety of ways to create a thread. Forming and rolling is always prefered when possible as it has higher material density and that makes for a stronger part. Cutting a thread is probably the weakest of all of them.

Thread lockers:

Thread lockers are basically sugar. Under pressure, the fluid transforms into a crystalline-like structure that will grow, fill a void, and exert some pressure. That pressure is what makes them stay put and why they require more effort to remove. It's not glue or adhesive. It's important to understand that. The bad side of LT is that it can break down if exposed to heat, excessive strain, or certain chemicals. It's why it is never used on things like head bolts, studs, or connecting rod bolts on an engine. Those depend on preloading the fastener during assembly.

All this is great, but what does it mean?

If you have 6-48 or 8-40 base screws, a dab of blue is not a bad thing. IF your base lacks any kind of lug feature that transfers recoil directly to the base it is a good idea to periodically check your screws AND I would recommend replacing them once a year if its on a light gun chambered in something big and nasty. (EDIT: Assuming this is a gun you shoot a lot, a safe queen is likely going to be fine although it never hurts to PM your stuff) I have personally witnessed scopes and bases flying off of rifles at events because of recoil-induced failure. None of those guns had a keyed base that interfaced with the receiver. They merely flopped the base to the top of the receiver and relied on the screws to hold everything together. Remember what I said: Screws work by acting as a spring in a tensile type load. During recoil, the load changes, and its also being applied at a right angle to the screw. Shearing forces are a completely different animal and it's really not how a puny 6-48 should be used when heavy optics are being attached to it. Adding the mass of rings and the riflescope works against you because it is now the job of those little guys to accelerate and decelerate the optic and all the related parts n pieces every time the gun goes bang. Rings are usually different because they work in tension. There are typically no shear loads applied or they are quite small. A typical STENAG base/ring setup might be the exception but those screws are typically pretty big and have plenty of cross-section to tolerate the loads being applied. Those rings are also often lugged so that they'll key into the base itself.

Base screws: The math that Jerome and I did suggests that the material we used at Nesika for guard screws could not exceed 40 inch-pounds. That was 303 stainless. Carbon steel (8620 or 1018 is very common) will tolerate a higher load. 50-60 inch-pounds seems to be the industry standard here. I would not recommend Loctite just because it's going to eventually lead to problems. These screws only work in tension as they should. Recoil is handled by the lug on the receiver and the well in the stock.

We can run down the whole list of possible parts, but this covers the big stuff.

Hope it helped.
You certainly know your screws. Great explanation of how it all works.
 
While we are out here in the weeds...

One comment for the crowd thinking replacing screws every time they are removed is the way to go...

In SOME assembly procedures (especially ones that don't call for lubrication of the threads) you will call for replacement of the fastener. The main reason (that I am aware of) for this is that the fastener is not likely to achieve the same clamping force on the subsequent applications

To explain: if you take a load cell and a new fastener and nut... Very first time you assemble it to a specific torque value you will achieve a clamping force value that it was intended to. Now if you take the torque off the fastener and turn around and torque it again (exact same fasteners and torque here as nothing has changed) you will get a lower clamping force. This clamping force will continue to fall over the next few assembly process and will vary based on size and material of the fastener.

Now if you take the same load cell and a new fastener, but apply lubrication this time... You will actually have to assemble to a lower torque value in order to achieve the same clamping force. (This is why your numbers are lower for lubricated torque as you can exceed elastic deformation on the fastener if using the same non lubricated torque value) so let's say this time you use a torque value that is 75% of the dry torque value and it yields the same clamping force as dry on the first assembly. Now remove the torque from the fastener and tighten to the same 75% of dry torque again and magically in comparison to the dry assembly your clamping force is drastically more consistent in subsequent assembly processes.

Now to the last monkey wrench... When you use this load cell and assemble with a substance such as blue loctite... You will see results that resemble the lubricated values in consistency and clamping force, as well as gaining a little extra security while shock loading the fastener. Downfall being it does take a little more to remove the fastener...

In conclusion... There may be some merit to the gentlemen's thoughts that you should treat blue loctite like franks red hot... It's not the fix all answer to everything, but there are a couple benefits that go along with it's use
 
Other than using too high strength of a thread locker that requires heat to remove, on something that you can’t heat up, there’s never really an application where thread locker is a bad idea that I can think of on a firearms application.

So for be the question is usually what thread locker to use. I put loctite blue or vibratite on almost everything. Red loctite on anything that can take heat a torch or heat gun for a few seconds if needed.



Edit: There are a couple threaded firearm applications I didn’t think about that I don’t loctite. I’ve never loctited barrels to actions, action screws, or optic ring/mount to base nuts or screws simply because they’re the ones that are often on and off and I’ve never had one loosen when properly torqued. Locker still wouldn’t hurt anything most likely.

I’ve got exceptions to this too though. I‘ve always taken suppressor mounts on and off every thorough barrel cleaning to get the crown good and remove the debris between the muzzle and brake/FH so I pull them regularly but they all get red loctite because I’ve had them loosen with proper torque. It’s already time consuming putting it in a barrel vise and getting tools out so I’ve never really seen using a heat gun or torch each time as an issue. Takes 15-20 or so seconds going around it with a small propane torch, 45 seconds with a heat gun and a minute to brush and acetone the threads.

Also, blue loctite works great for some surface to surface applications. I’ve always put a few dabs between bases and actions on rifles and shotguns and any thing else like pistol optic plates and such where moisture and rust could be an issue. I’ve never once removed one and had any rust present, but I’ve taken plenty of bases off of guns that were only mounted for short periods, some new guns coated in oil, that had surface rust. It also fills voids, essentially bedding the surfaces.

I love loctite if you can’t tell.
 
Last edited: