At least 80M seem to be ...its clear where the other side stands.we're much too sophisticated today to start killing each other over idealistic differences.
We want to see your skills! Post a video between now and November 1st showing what you've learned from Frank's lessons and 3 people will be selected to win a free shirt. Good luck everyone!
Create a channel Learn moreAt least 80M seem to be ...its clear where the other side stands.we're much too sophisticated today to start killing each other over idealistic differences.
No I don't think sowe're much too sophisticated today to start killing each other over idealistic differences.
F the Chinese. They import grain from us because they cannot feed themselves. While they slap together the latest i-phone in a few high tech cities, the majority of their empire walks behind oxen carts. The only power they have currently is by virtue of our greed.China already has subverted our government, inflicted uncalculated intangible losses via Wuhan, has had our lunch and working on dinner....
Which reminds me - Texas needs to audit recent state & local elections...After you finish throwing them out don't forget the root of the problem, democrats.
I was going to say Alaska until you added in Federal rules and control.Guess who has the best supply of that. All without federal taxes or control and rules.
And no rainbow Sh*t...I would think it would have a lot of red in it.... a lot of red
I hate to rain on your parade but the north still beats the south from a GDP standpointThe south was an agrarian economy with little industry and few natural resources that the north needed.
Today it's about as 180 degrees from that as anyone can imagine.
Not to mention that if things come to blows, it won't be two organized armies duking it out across fields. It will be much more personal.....shall we say?
Thats a nice thought but thats not how commies work. Theres no options. Do it our way or receive a pellet at the base of your skull.i have advocated for a separation for awhile now.
it would actually be very easy and i would think both the progressives and conservatives would go for it,
on the surface it would still be the united states
but there would be two distinctly different gov'ts governing their respective side
one side could be the progressive utopia they dream and jerk off too.
the other side would be the conservative backwoods paradise a lot of us here on the hide seem to enjoy.
the president effectively becomes like the King or queen of england ....no real power just a figurehead or ambassador if you will. evry year or two or four years the president is elected from the other side. to make it fair again, no real authority
each side would have it own governing body, exc, leg and jud
each side would be able to live the life their side favors
you would not HAVE to move but may choose too if your living in the part that is opposite to your thinking
the split would be diagonal from southern california to somewhere through NY with the northern parts and most of cali going to the left (it already is for the most part) the lower portion would be conservative
both sides would access to ports, mountains, beaches, Canada and mexico
no check points or anything just a sign stating you are entering the CSA (conservative states of america) and a sign saying you are entering the SBSA ( shit bag states of america) lol or something like that
corporations stay put ( at least initially)
Nothing changes with the military
nothing changes with states money ( at least initaly)
..thats it LOl simple.
You are clueless.Yes, he did that while allowing military bases to bring in thousands of illegals...he's got some explaining to do...and the gun laws do not take affect until Sept. 1, it could be a long six weeks.
He may not control bases, but he controls the highways immediately beyond them...and most were shipped via busses not planes.You are clueless.
Texas doesn't own or controll federal military bases.
At the moment Govenor Abbott has no controll of them.
So don't go blaming that shit on him.
Actually you have a point on that but I was talking from the view of states that might want to leave and know not much about Alaska's politics.I was going to say Alaska until you added in Federal rules and control.
would actually be very easy and i would think both the progressives and conservatives would go for it
He may not control bases, but he controls the highways immediately beyond them...and most were shipped via busses not planes.
Besides, the way I see it, with so many of the red states being incredible moocher states propped up by the wealth of blue states,
I think after a while most folks will have preferred a massive asteroid impact instead or better yet rethought the whole red state vs blue state thing and realized it's not that bad.
Besides, the way I see it, with so many of the red states being incredible moocher states propped up by the wealth of blue states, it's probably better to leave the idea of secession alone while things are still going good. They get to complain loudly while those blue dollars get re-directed to them and they also get wildly outsized representation in DC too. Why upset so many advantages?
He may not control bases, but he controls the highways immediately beyond them...and most were shipped via busses not planes.
And hence therein lies the dilemma. This ain't happening. If anyone is being shown a door its "domestic terrorists". The youth don't know enough about history and are easily brainwashed. The marxists ruling the show...they have been at this game a long time and frankly we have already taken too much time to respond. This didn't "just" happen Nov. 3.I don’t want to secede. I want America to be run and governed according to the constitution again. If the libs don’t like it, there’s the door, get the fuck out. Make them leave for those socialists utopias they blather on about want to emulate so much.
Granted it will take some time to get up to speed for most of the states but people need to know going in that things will be different for awhileThere's a pretty interesting novel that came out recently on this subject that paints a realistic scenario for a 21st century American civil war and it's pretty bleak, for both sides.
People get pretty emotional about this stuff, but I don't think they realize just how bad everyone's lives would be if the union split. You dream of SHTF scenarios? This is worse, way worse in the long run. I think after a while most folks will have preferred a massive asteroid impact instead or better yet rethought the whole red state vs blue state thing and realized it's not that bad.
Besides, the way I see it, with so many of the red states being incredible moocher states propped up by the wealth of blue states, it's probably better to leave the idea of secession alone while things are still going good. They get to complain loudly while those blue dollars get re-directed to them and they also get wildly outsized representation in DC too. Why upset so many advantages?
I kinda had cross border raids in mind.Not to mention i am advocating for an amicable and peaceful solution to two opposing sides with little to no common ground. I would love nothing more if not one shot is fired. we can still be americans just different ways we choose to live our life.
You must live in one of them 10th A states that legalized drugs.
Take another pill.
While the red/blue state contributions may be skewed toward blue, that doesn’t really mean anything if there was a split. Republicans at least say they want limited gov and what better way to spark an economic boom than to establish at least a limited constitutional republic again. If they really mean what they say and property rights were respected and enforced equally the new country would be an economic powerhouse in no time at allThe truth hurts sometimes, doesn't it? If you were expecting a PC answer like "all states contribute equally and get participation trophies too!" you came to the wrong forum...right? Look, I'm just telling it like it is: most red states leach more and most blue states contribute more, so the red states seceding is kind of a foolish idea just based on economics alone.
By the way, my only pills are Cabozantinib for cancer and Ambien for PTSD. But have you tried the Red State Koolaid these days? It only comes in orange flavor and I hear it'll really give you thin skin and an outsized ego.
I hate to rain on your parade but the north still beats the south from a GDP standpoint
GDP by State 2023
worldpopulationreview.com
Florida only ranks high due to tourism
It also does not include underfunded entitlement liabilities, a huge weight around CA's neck.GDP doesn't mean shit. It includes a shitload of non-value adding industries like finance, law, real estate, and sundry service jobs.
That shit doesn't sustain when there's no fuel and food.
The truth hurts sometimes, doesn't it? If you were expecting a PC answer like "all states contribute equally and get participation trophies too!" you came to the wrong forum...right? Look, I'm just telling it like it is: most red states leach more and most blue states contribute more, so the red states seceding is kind of a foolish idea just based on economics alone.
By the way, my only pills are Cabozantinib for cancer and Ambien for PTSD. But have you tried the Red State Koolaid these days? It only comes in orange flavor and I hear it'll really give you thin skin and an outsized ego.
How is that different then what we already have?it will tough for people living along the new border. you can live according to your sides laws BUT
BUt
make a wrong turn and it could go downhill real quick
example
if your a libtart don't be carrying drugs and looking for a safe needle shooting spot and make a wrong turn and go into the conservative section. your going to be taken in.
also
if your a conservative
don't be on your way to church carrying your pistol and make a wrong turn into the SBSA
at this point
the gov'ts will have to arrange an exchange centers one for one.
these are just two examples of the too numerous scenarios we are sure to face.
Hawaii will go back to the natives, quite fastWell, I hate to see Hawaii go, but if they are liberal in mind-set anyway...
Lets see how much gdp they pump out without food, or without an underlying product for their institutions to service. Wall street won't mean nearly as much in that setting. They might have a tough time with a lot of their energy resources gone. This has all been gamed in multiple simulations. The biggest we know of is during the Obama administration. They ran it multiple times trying to change the options to favor the liberal side. It never ends well for them. They always end up the losers. The only thing that seems to change is time and how many die in the process. The longest sim I saw was 4 years I think, but the outcome was the same.I hate to rain on your parade but the north still beats the south from a GDP standpoint
GDP by State 2023
worldpopulationreview.com
Florida only ranks high due to tourism
Mountain + South need to band together and they'd have the rest of the regions under control in no time.
You are talking about a federal govt that lit a building on fire and murdered innocent women and children, and then posed for photos over the burned corpses.....all because of SUSPECTED "illegal guns" ( which were never found BTW)...Not to mention i am advocating for an amicable and peaceful solution to two opposing sides with little to no common ground. I would love nothing more if not one shot is fired. we can still be americans just different ways we choose to live our life.
80mm plus 1At least 80M seem to be ...its clear where the other side stands.
so history isn't your best subject I take itThe biggest mistake that time around was not destroying literally everything and everyone south of the MD line.
Davis should have been drawn and quartered in public in the center of Richmond followed by the razing of the entire city.
No quarter for traitors.