• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

PortaJohn

qReC0i8mz7v2.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: HD1911, Josh1978, UKDslayer and 10 others
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: Beefmanne, gigamortis, 10ring'r and 1 other person
Longshot231 said:
There is plenty of ink devoted to say there is no corroboration that Yamamoto made the following statement:

"You cannot invade mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass."

Well then, how did it get started? Supposedly it was written in the writings of Gordon Prange, the Chief Historian on MacArthur's staff. However, that statement cannot be found in Prange's documents.

It must have got started somewhere. It is likely that was Yamamoto's sentiments. After all, he spent some time in the United States. He attended Harvard from 1919 to 1921. Then he attended the US Naval War College in 1924. He was reputed to have traveled the US extensively in those years. Although I doubt he would have time to travel while attending the War College.

Nevertheless, he had to have known of the fondness Americans had for firearms. This would have been at a variance to the culture he was brought up in. The "gun culture" for lack of a better characterization would have made a deep impression on him.

There are plenty of writings and eyewitness accounts of him expressing his disagreement with attacking the United States. Not only were his misgivings a result of seeing the military-industrial might of the US but knowing that Americans have been raised to be "bitter-clingers" since childhood.

So while I don't disagree with you completely, I will say that even though we can't find proof that was a direct quote from Yamamoto, his sentiments were such that he could have said it.

I read that MacArthur never said, "I shall return." The first time he said this it was, "I will return." The War Department felt that "shall" had more impact than "will." After that he always said, "I shall return."

What cannot be disputed was MacArthur's resolve in get back to the Philippines.

Napoleon is often quoted as saying, "Never interrupt your enemy while he is making a mistake." That wasn't a direct quote either. If I recall correctly, it was in a much longer discourse with one of his cavalry commanders. Nevertheless, that dictum is one which Ole Boney lived by. It's one that all good military commanders should abide by as well.

Nathan Hale supposedly never said, "I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country." This is based on the writings of a British Officer who witnessed Hale's execution. The line came from a play that was popular in the early 18th century.

Being an educator, Hale would have been familiar with the play and famous quote. I have no doubt that it could have been made up and embellished by Colonial journalists who wanted to whip up the anger of freedom loving Americans. It worked.

Maybe before starting out on his spy mission, Hale made the statement to a friend. Maybe he told a captor or another witness this before he was led to the noose. We won't ever know. What we do know, from everything else is that this is the way Nathan Hale felt.

The gospel writers attributed many statements made by Jesus. We would put those statements in quotation marks today and even cite chapter and verse from the New Testament epistles. The gospel writers, given the way the Kone Greek was written more or less encapsulated all of his statements into what looks like direct quotes to us today. One can say the same thing over and over again in many different ways.

So my statement was not meant to be a direct quote but to capitalize on Yamamoto's very accurate assessments of US capabilities at that time and tie it in with the fact that we enjoy the felicities of freedom backed up by a shit load of guns and ammunition in light of the unrealistic attitude of those that want to put us in concentration camps.

Even Yamamoto expressed a lack of temerity on attacking the US with rifles behind every blade of grass. Let them try that and watch millions of "Huckleberries" sprouting in lawns and gardens throughout America
Click to expand...

Yada
Yada
Yada
Not reading it, read it before.
It all means one thing.
No evidence he ever said it, nor wrote it.

This is how revisionist history starts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eostech, M8541Reaper and OldSalty2
Just caught a conspiracy (overreach IMHO) theory on the link between the COVID internment camps soon to hit Washington state and their "passing laws to destroy the bodies with lye and wash them down the drain to be put on your foods" by Health Ranger. I spent about 3 hours down that rabbit hole and thought I'd share MHO so you don't waste your time.

I thought I knew about "alkaline hydrolysis" aka "green cremation" or "aquamation" that the "sustainers"/"environmentalists" are pushing as a cleaner cheap form of burial and way to save space. I knew human remains were put in a stainless steel vat, mixed with water and "lye" , stirred at high temperature and pressures, and the family may receive a product only slightly different from traditional incinerator/heat cremation ashes, and then there was something about "fertilizer for the garden" I must admit I dismissed. So, the bones do indeed produce a white powder.

But about the rest of the remains, what would be the majority of the body - well that actually usually just goes into the local sewage system (down the drain). That then is typically reconstituted as "Biosludge" along with solid remains from regular sewer processing that is converted to "organic fertilizer" and offered to farmers. Yes, so the technically if you choose this method of disposal for loved ones they literally could be fertilizer your veggies. Not put on your food per se but...yes fertilizer, you get the idea.

Will this method be used by interment camps to "hide bodies"? No, I doubt it. Why? First of all, this process is legal only in about 20 states so far (a few more are considering it), but it does require those facilities to be have the right set up, and it typically takes much longer (8+ hours depending on temperature) than standard cremation. It technically is "greener" in terms of gases produced etc. than traditional cremation but we know that is a ruse to TPTB in terms of practicality. Don't really see any advantage of this method over cremation for just convenient disposal other than maybe a little more clandestine in no smoke being produced.

Now the topic of Biosludge is a worthy topic in and of itself - since there is no regulation of the "soil" or "fertilizer" produced. Any and everything flushed down a toilet or sink, including from industrial plants, is included and not subject to any regulation. It is typically marketed as "organic fertilizer", but can literally contain a lot of sh*t besides excrement (street & pharmaceutical drugs, toxic chemicals, infectious organisms). Health Ranger did do a good documentary on this topic, free on Brighteon, that at 2x speed takes about 35minutes and was interesting if not disconcerting. But I give a thumbs down to the alkaline hydrolysis link-to-the-camps hype. The Biosludge documentary is pre-Covid, 2018.
www.brighteon.com

Biosludged - Full Documentary - closed captioned (English)

Brighteon.com is a leading online free platform that empowers free speech, allowing individuals to freely share videos and express their thoughts without any form of censorship. Join us today and be part of our community.
www.brighteon.com www.brighteon.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: AllenOne1
UKDslayer said:
So who has been invited to speak at Davos, a.k.a. World Economic Forum? China's Xi, and our Fauci


He basically applauded Xi for China's control of "disformation" and implies we should get rid of our first amendment.
Click to expand...

Watch 12:05-14:10. @12:50 "...extraordinary successful protective vaccine..." What the fuck? Guess we measure "success" differently.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: 10ring'r
UKDslayer said:
Will this method be used by interment camps to "hide bodies"? No, I doubt it. Why? First of all, this process is legal only in about 20 states so far (a few more are considering it), but it does require those facilities to be have the right set up
Click to expand...
Maybe you remember the EPA mine cleanup that poisoned everyone downstream?

14 Aug, 2015
55cdfdf7c361881c588b4567.jpg


As Native American tribes are struggling to cope with a toxic spill caused by an Environmental Protection Agency contractor that turned a river in Colorado orange, a letter from a retired geologist has emerged, that warned of the risk a week beforehand.

A contractor for the EPA released some three million gallons of toxic mining sludge on August 5 while attempting to clean up an abandoned mine near Silverton, Colorado. The waste flowed into Cement Creek, and has since contaminated the Animas River, San Juan River, and the Colorado River in Utah.



This one got even less attention:

Pro .gov Tip: don't test for "rocket fuel' and you won't find "rocket fuel" in the water supply. ;)

Is That Rocket Fuel Contaminating Your Water? - Scientific ...​

https://www.scientificamerican.com › article › perchlorate-contamination-regulation-water
Is That Rocket Fuel Contaminating Your Water? ... Almost overnight, it seemed, perchlorate was turning up everywhere, including the Colorado River, which provides water for 20 million people.
 
Last edited:
SQ54 said:
What’s the difference between this and my debit card? (said the smartass) Asking for a friend.
Click to expand...

It removes the easy option for in person transactions that are not traceable. I see physical cash as a deterrent from extreme government measures to control people's money. If they push too hard too fast, people will abandon traceable transactions & start using cash. If physical money is removed, it will be easier to do a sweeping takeover leaving people with less immediate methods of avoidance.

Sure people can barter, but that is a much higher friction alternative to money, which is why money is the main method across the globe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gigamortis
KZP said:
It removes the easy option for in person transactions that are not traceable. I see physical cash as a deterrent from extreme government measures to control people's money. If they push too hard too fast, people will abandon traceable transactions & start using cash. If physical money is removed, it will be easier to do a sweeping takeover leaving people with less immediate methods of avoidance.

Sure people can barter, but that is a much higher friction alternative to money, which is why money is the main method across the globe.
Click to expand...
www.apmex.com

Buy 2022 1 oz Silver American Eagle Brilliant Uncirc | APMEX

2022 1 oz American Silver Eagle Coin BU | Largest selection & fast free shipping on orders $199+.
www.apmex.com www.apmex.com


just sayin’
 
SQ54 said:
www.apmex.com

Buy 2022 1 oz Silver American Eagle Brilliant Uncirc | APMEX

2022 1 oz American Silver Eagle Coin BU | Largest selection & fast free shipping on orders $199+.
www.apmex.com www.apmex.com


just sayin’
Click to expand...

Private transactions sure, that's an alternative. Assuming the person receiving it is wiling to risk a counterfeit coin or has knowledge/equipment to test authenticity. Precious metal coins won't work at the majority of retailers if physical cash is deleted from the economy. It will have to be traded in for FedBux at online or physical major retailers.

I'm also going to count on the government becoming aggressive in banning precious metals/cash alternatives being used as currency to discourage that from becoming normal in anyway if "underground economies" grow. Become a snitch, get a $50k FedBux deposit into your digital wallet.
 
KZP said:
Private transactions sure, that's an alternative. Assuming the person receiving it is wiling to risk a counterfeit coin or has knowledge/equipment to test authenticity. Precious metal coins won't work at the majority of retailers if physical cash is deleted from the economy. It will have to be traded in for FedBux at online or physical major retailers.

I'm also going to count on the government becoming aggressive in banning precious metals/cash alternatives being used as currency to discourage that from becoming normal in anyway if "underground economies" grow. Become a snitch, get a $50k FedBux deposit into your digital wallet.
Click to expand...
I'm sure you already know how to test

 
  • Like
Reactions: KZP
KZP said:
Private transactions sure, that's an alternative. Assuming the person receiving it is wiling to risk a counterfeit coin or has knowledge/equipment to test authenticity. Precious metal coins won't work at the majority of retailers if physical cash is deleted from the economy. It will have to be traded in for FedBux at online or physical major retailers.

I'm also going to count on the government becoming aggressive in banning precious metals/cash alternatives being used as currency to discourage that from becoming normal in anyway if "underground economies" grow. Become a snitch, get a $50k FedBux deposit into your digital wallet.
Click to expand...
Gold/silver coin is legal in Texas and several other states.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim Out
SQ54 said:
Gold/silver coin is legal in Texas and several other states.
Click to expand...

For now. If the Fed moves to delete cash I'm not sure how each state will react. That's why I expect initially it will not be for everyone, just major banks, then large corporations slide in etc. until it eventually covers every person.

This move could be what really starts to split states from Federal participation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SQ54 and Jim Out
UKDslayer said:
Just caught a conspiracy (overreach IMHO) theory on the link between the COVID internment camps soon to hit Washington state and their "passing laws to destroy the bodies with lye and wash them down the drain to be put on your foods" by Health Ranger. I spent about 3 hours down that rabbit hole and thought I'd share MHO so you don't waste your time.

I thought I knew about "alkaline hydrolysis" aka "green cremation" or "aquamation" that the "sustainers"/"environmentalists" are pushing as a cleaner cheap form of burial and way to save space. I knew human remains were put in a stainless steel vat, mixed with water and "lye" , stirred at high temperature and pressures, and the family may receive a product only slightly different from traditional incinerator/heat cremation ashes, and then there was something about "fertilizer for the garden" I must admit I dismissed. So, the bones do indeed produce a white powder.

But about the rest of the remains, what would be the majority of the body - well that actually usually just goes into the local sewage system (down the drain). That then is typically reconstituted as "Biosludge" along with solid remains from regular sewer processing that is converted to "organic fertilizer" and offered to farmers. Yes, so the technically if you choose this method of disposal for loved ones they literally could be fertilizer your veggies. Not put on your food per se but...yes fertilizer, you get the idea.

Will this method be used by interment camps to "hide bodies"? No, I doubt it. Why? First of all, this process is legal only in about 20 states so far (a few more are considering it), but it does require those facilities to be have the right set up, and it typically takes much longer (8+ hours depending on temperature) than standard cremation. It technically is "greener" in terms of gases produced etc. than traditional cremation but we know that is a ruse to TPTB in terms of practicality. Don't really see any advantage of this method over cremation for just convenient disposal other than maybe a little more clandestine in no smoke being produced.

Now the topic of Biosludge is a worthy topic in and of itself - since there is no regulation of the "soil" or "fertilizer" produced. Any and everything flushed down a toilet or sink, including from industrial plants, is included and not subject to any regulation. It is typically marketed as "organic fertilizer", but can literally contain a lot of sh*t besides excrement (street & pharmaceutical drugs, toxic chemicals, infectious organisms). Health Ranger did do a good documentary on this topic, free on Brighteon, that at 2x speed takes about 35minutes and was interesting if not disconcerting. But I give a thumbs down to the alkaline hydrolysis link-to-the-camps hype. The Biosludge documentary is pre-Covid, 2018.
www.brighteon.com

Biosludged - Full Documentary - closed captioned (English)

Brighteon.com is a leading online free platform that empowers free speech, allowing individuals to freely share videos and express their thoughts without any form of censorship. Join us today and be part of our community.
www.brighteon.com www.brighteon.com
Click to expand...
No regulations for making fertilizer? Come on man, what year of you think this is? :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Sewage sludge is not allowed in anything OMRI listed or Certified Organic.

www.epa.gov

Biosolids Laws and Regulations | US EPA

Information related to biosolids laws and regulations
www.epa.gov www.epa.gov

www.epa.gov

Agriculture Nutrient Management and Fertilizer | US EPA

Fertilizers and soil amendments can be derived from raw materials, composts and other organic matter, and wastes, such as sewage sludge and certain industrial wastes. Overuse of fertilizers can result in contamination of surface water and groundwater.
www.epa.gov www.epa.gov

Sewage sludge that is used in agriculture is regulated under the Clean Water Act, and is currently subject to concentration limits for the following metals:
  • arsenic
  • cadmium
  • copper
  • lead
  • mercury
  • molybdenum
  • nickel
  • selenium
  • zinc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: armorpl8chikn and UKDslayer
  • Like
Reactions: bab029
Nancy said the democrats in the house are the greatest collection of intellect and integrity,........BWAHAHAHAHAHAH....... i cant even type it all out without laughing.....
 
www.thegatewaypundit.com

UPDATE: Elections Expert Reveals Over 550,000 Registered Voters In Wisconsin Have a Registration Date of 1/1/1918 - 115,252 of Them VOTED in 2020 (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Julian Conradson

On Wednesday, the Wisconsin Assembly held another election integrity hearing to present evidence of voter fraud and irregularities that have been found in their investigation of the rigged 2020 election.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com

UPDATE: Elections Expert Reveals Over 550,000 Registered Voters In Wisconsin Have a Registration Date of 1/1/1918 – 115,252 of Them VOTED in 2020 (VIDEO)​

 
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: HD1911, gigamortis, 10ring'r and 5 others
there is SO much fraud in tax returns... TONS... if this is a step to try to crack down on it.. I'm all for it.
I also think EVERY child credit must have a SS#. That's one of the biggest scams, fake/ghost kids.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Lowlight
I need the account Not the Fucking Story
Replies
56
Views
2K
sirhrmechanic
sirhrmechanic
Lowlight
Some of you guys are in for a surprise
Replies
661
Views
18K
Gunfighter14e2
Gunfighter14e2
Lowlight
The Everyday Sniper Podcast: New Training Seasons Starts Now
Replies
0
Views
133
Lowlight
Lowlight
Lowlight
Hide TV Training Videos
Replies
0
Views
187
Lowlight
Lowlight
Lowlight
RifleKraft - Sniper's Hide May 15th, 16th, & 17th Cameo, Colorado
Replies
0
Views
283
Lowlight
Lowlight
Top Bottom
Back