Recent content by EROCO

I use a 20 moa rail and do not use the stop. Barrel is 28" and I shoot from 100 to 1300 regularly. I had the melonite treatment done and after 1100 rounds it shoots better than ever. The scope is perfect for matches where the user is not fidgeting with the settings too much, the little quirks...

I also own a vortex razor hd, and a new Nightforce competition scope and hands down for optical performance it's IOR all the way. It's just a heavy beast and parallax adj is a pain, other than that it does what it's supposed to do better than anything I've seen.. By the way I shoot a custom...

I have been shooting mine for a couple of years now and love it. The optical performance of this scope is amazing and will be tough to beat. I have won a few 1K matches with this thing so far and still going strong. The only thing I don't like about it is the parallax adjustment being way...

Re: Fired some 260 out of my 308 by accident Yes it was a bit quieter.. I just had the boxes of ammo switched, the brass after firing looks like a 308 brass now.. I won't take any chances, I'm throwing away the 3 brass cases..

Re: Fired some 260 out of my 308 by accident Lol, thanks .. It happened, I didn't hit jack.. Brass is trashed, lol

Could I have hurt the barrel on my 308? I was not able to fire another 308 through round at the range because I could not chamber a 308 because of unburrnt powder that was spilled on the chamber that had to get cleaned out. Am I screwed? Thanks.

Re: how has no one posted the new 1 mile Bushnell LRF I want

I am trying to find out what part number there is from Sinclair. I need a Sinclair cleaning rod guide for my JP AR in 260, I am seeing one for an AR 308 and AR 243 but none for an AR 260. If I have to choose would a 243 bore guide work? Thanks.

Re: Capability of 260/6.5x47 vs 308 If this is your first rifle, I think 308 would be a good choice. Having sad that, generally a 308 would deliver more energy on target for ranges below 5-6 hundred yards without too much penalty compared to a 6.5mm in terms of windage and bullet drop.

Re: 260 cal, 123 VS 139 Lapua scenar Thanks BoilerUp!! I'll take a look at the Berger's.

Re: 260 cal, 123 VS 139 Lapua scenar <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: turbo54</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: EROCO</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div...

Re: 260 cal, 123 VS 139 Lapua scenar <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: turbo54</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: EROCO</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Ballistic calculator...

Re: 260 cal, 123 VS 139 Lapua scenar Ballistic calculator results only using iSnipe. I'm trying to decide which bullet to go with for 1000 yd matches.

Re: 260 cal, 123 VS 139 Lapua scenar Actually I did just that but forgot to include that.. At 1000 yds, 5 mph wind at 270 deg, the 123 has a total windage of 24.7 while the 139 has 31.1 which is quite a significant advantage for the 123.. Time in flight is 1.30 and 1.36 respectively..

123 scenar 3050 FPS mv 600 yd drop 9.02 1000 yd drop 21.68 139 scenar 2890 FPS mv 600 yd drop 10.2 1000 yd drop 24.0 Fired from a PACNOR 28" barrel at 4400 alt, 70 deg ambient temp Calculations were run from my iSnipe calculator. Does this data look right to you folks? I ask because the...