Interesting that the officers have given up the high ground to the protesters and have instead chosen the undefendable low ground. Need to be a little smarter than this. Tactical advantage is a thing.
I'd like to know how many of these people are US Citizens. My guess is < 10%. At that point, we should declare that this is a hostile invasion and the 10% are guilty of sedition and are enemy combatants (though I think that went to SCOTUS under Bush).
If these were US Citizens protesting I'd be a bit more sympathetic to actually PROTESTING (not rioting) even if I disagree. Because the no-clot-shot folks could have been caught in a situation, truckers in Canada definitely were (no 1A there though). 1A cannot be trampled (though it is daily as we now have rules protecting the elite political class from even seeing protests with standoff zones under the name of safety [not liberty]). However, this is NOT a protest under any guise.
Yet, the press continues to be unable to distinguish an actual RIOT and INSURRECTION from the crap that happened on Jan 6 (though I'm not in support of just marching through buildings either for multiple reason- though we know within a degree of certainty it was a set-up).
Bring out the water (?) canons with that blue dye. Or maybe make it day-glow magenta dye indellible for 6months-1 year!! THIS malarky in KaliForni is 100% why we MUST, under all costs, control our own freaking border.
Or, when real bullets fly from the other side (arguably in every state with concealed carry they've displayed the use of deady force by tossing rocks nd scooters at moving vehicles) do the Guard members have authorization to shoot back? IIRC, Reagan allowed the use of real bullets in the 60s during the riots then.
Act Blue or Soros?
justthenews.com
