No guns for tyrannies

918v

918v

Rapper on benefits
Full Member
Minuteman
Jul 15, 2007
10,088
10,363
Miserable CA
#1
It’s time to confiscate guns from tyrannies. They are a threat to the intergalactic community. Reeducation, not guns, is the answer. Freedom loving Americans should be given the seized guns on a lottery basis.
 
Last edited:
#2
918v said:
It’s time to confiscate guns from tyrannies. They are a threat to the world community. Reeducation, not guns, is the answer. Freedom loving Americans should be given the seized guns on a lottery basis.
Click to expand...
Great idea.......the last people who should have guns are tyrants!! Now, what about trannies.......should they have guns??
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 91Eunozs and jr81452
#7
This is the gayest thread yet.

Gayer than JD vance in drag.
1757179309037.png

Gayer than Z man being Vances power bottom.

1757179352849.png


Gayer than Trump giving it to the Devil.

1757179448100.png


fuck you and you pro Nazi ideology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jr81452
#15
Sorry, but not going to advocate taking guns from trannies.

Lockinig them up... medicating them into comas... whatever.

But first the Trannies then the Veterans, then the Republicans then everyone.

Trannies have a Second Amendment right. They even have a right to dress like chicks.

When they are mentally-ill... lock them away. But taking away their tools (That's funny right there) is not going to solve the problem.

Sirhr
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jsp556, Bbob and jr81452
#16
sirhrmechanic said:
Sorry, but not going to advocate taking guns from trannies.

Lockinig them up... medicating them into comas... whatever.

But first the Trannies then the Veterans, then the Republicans then everyone.

Trannies have a Second Amendment right. They even have a right to dress like chicks.

When they are mentally-ill... lock them away. But taking away their tools (That's funny right there) is not going to solve the problem.

Sirhr
Click to expand...

This thread is about tyrannies. You know, governments who oppress the people.
 
#22
sirhrmechanic said:
But first the Trannies then the Veterans, then the Republicans then everyone.
Click to expand...

Thats exactly how the order of things would go in this backwards world. In reality, it’s the nut bag democrats killing people; they are the ones who should be restricted from having guns. Actually, it would be better to stop glorifying the ones doing the shooting and stop framing them as the victim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 918v and sirhrmechanic
#23
I'm a strict Constitutionalist and I believe it means EXACTLY what it says in plain English. And I am eternally grateful that we have a Constitution otherwise we would be liable, just to name one small example, to have the same crap that's going on in the UK where people are being jailed for speech (and in one case, thought as the person was praying silently)...not to even mention being jailed for a fucking pocket knife. Guns....fuggetaboutit.

The 2nd A is very clear...and yes, I did not include the preparatory phrase that the libtards try to interpret to be some sort of restriction on the part that is the actual individual right....the very clear noun and the verb of this right.

"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"

Therefore, although I think the whole tranny thing is insane and I object to many aspects of leftists promotion of the same, I will never support denying a Constitutional enumerated individual right to a broadly defined "group".

We do have restrictions on enumerated rights...such as the 2nd A.... for specific individuals based on that individual's specific actions...but not their membership in some amorphously defined group.

That which can be used against some group we don't belong to can then be used against us. The Constitution applies to all American citizens....even those who belong to groups we find objectionable.

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
—Martin Niemöller
Click to expand...

I am a strict Constitutionalist....and I'm happy with that.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: KYAggie, LuckyLuke80 and jr81452
#24
Disarming tyrannies is easier said than done. I mean, by definition of a tyranny “they” got power somehow and said tyrannies control the laws and the force. I hate this talk of using laws to disarm this group or that group because that is too easy to turn around on others. Also, if we as law abiding gun owners get that mentality we are no better than the elitists who say “we can have this privilege, but you can’t unless you join us.”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Blue Sky Country
BREAKING: ATTENTION ALBERTA, CANADA GUN OWNERS: Do NOT comply with disarmament.
Replies
9
Views
855
Ronws
Ronws
Fx51LP308
Show yer Peacemakers, folks!
Replies
102
Views
3K
Douglas-001
Douglas-001
PatMiles
Report: LGBTQ Flocking to Gun Ranges Ahead of Trump Inauguration!
Replies
48
Views
2K
clark33
clark33
sirhrmechanic
Blue on blue.... they are eating their own!
Replies
24
Views
2K
Im2bent
Im2bent
Jgault
One of the 2nd amendments blood enemies actually gets it, or says she does
Replies
69
Views
3K
Pok
P
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts