Someone murdered Charlie Kirk

You and I clicked.
So it was a small high explosive? Sure doesn’t look like a blast wound.

Shaped charge? Or projectile coming out of the mic? How did they keep it pointed the right direction as it flopped around with his tshirt?

I say nope.
Having the detonator where he touched his shirt seems dumb too. Let’s have a setup so there’s an obviously out of the ordinary movement people will notice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makinchips208

IMG_7823.jpeg
 
Even the very liberal snopes says some of this is bs

Magically after they see everyone supporting TPUSA rumors of child trafficking and working as a trump honeypot start, not suspicious at all. Definitely couldn’t be far left psy-ops
 
You know who hates Jews and the Nation of Israel more than the some of the folks here? The Roman Catholic Church. The Vatican hates Jews and killed Charlie because of his Israel views and his following .., kinda kidding, but kind not really. Atleast they had something to gain from it. Figure while we got em coming, I may throw another conspiracy theory in the hole and see what we come up with .
 
You know who hates Jews and Israel more than the some of the folks here? The Roman Catholic Church. The Vatican killed Charlie because of his Israel views and his following .., kinda kidding, but kind not really. Atleast they had something to gain from it. Figure while we got em coming, I may throw another conspiracy theory in the hole and see what we come up with .
IMG_7837.gif
 
About 19:08 can hear the shot come from his right, that deflates the "shot from behind" BS.



Video is weird, uploaded video maybe more so.

Several people clearly visibly react all at the same time a split second before the report. The dark haired guy to the right of the kid being interviewed visibly flinches, the heavy chick over his left shoulder throws her hands up, the skinny chick over his right shoulder stands up ... you can see them all the way on the other side of the courtyard reacting.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ken226
Video is weird, uploaded video maybe more so.

Several people clearly visibly react all at the same time a split second before the report. The dark haired guy to the right of the kid being interviewed visibly flinches, the heavy chick over his left shoulder throws her hands up, the skinny chick over his right shoulder stands up ... you can see them all the way on the other side of the courtyard reacting.

You can see the Asian kid next to the one talking visibly flinch before the report. And yeah, that heavy girl throws her hands up. Some others do react before the camera picks it up. I wonder if it's something to do with whatever device is recording. Some smartphones (like iPhones) have automatic background sound cancelling and/or gain-limiting filters. For example, if I try to record loud music, like a concert, on my iPhone it automatically limits the loud noises by turning the gain down on the mic and compressing the audio.

But yeah, that video (which I've seen before) is odd.
 
I wonder if it's something to do with whatever device is recording

I think it's a combination of frame rate and audio track sync in the original video and maybe an artifact of conversion on upload.

In my limited experience, video and audio are usually recorded on separate channels.
 
You know who hates Jews and the Nation of Israel more than the some of the folks here? The Roman Catholic Church. The Vatican hates Jews and killed Charlie because of his Israel views and his following .., kinda kidding, but kind not really. Atleast they had something to gain from it. Figure while we got em coming, I may throw another conspiracy theory in the hole and see what we come up with .
 
You know who hates Jews and the Nation of Israel more than the some of the folks here? The Roman Catholic Church. The Vatican hates Jews and killed Charlie because of his Israel views and his following .., kinda kidding, but kind not really. Atleast they had something to gain from it. Figure while we got em coming, I may throw another conspiracy theory in the hole and see what we come up with .
Early in his career he was very much an Israel apologist but the last few years and especially the last months he was a very outspoken critic of/about the state of Israel.
 
At the risk of ridicule and white knight attacks…

I just get the heebie jeebies when I hear Ms. Kirk speak. When she says “Charlie baby” and especially when she was speaking at the memorial and publicly forgave the shooter …. I just get the impression of some performance and I can’t shake it.

I have talked to my sister and wife and they see it as well. I don’t want it to be a product of an overly jaded perspective so I have sat on it a while to see how I feel with some more time. It isn’t subsiding.

I am certainly not asserting that she is behind some conspiracy, just that something doesn’t seem genuine.

Flame proof underwear are donned so …
 
At the risk of ridicule and white knight attacks…

I just get the heebie jeebies when I hear Ms. Kirk speak. When she says “Charlie baby” and especially when she was speaking at the memorial and publicly forgave the shooter …. I just get the impression of some performance and I can’t shake it.

I have talked to my sister and wife and they see it as well. I don’t want it to be a product of an overly jaded perspective so I have sat on it a while to see how I feel with some more time. It isn’t subsiding.

I am certainly not asserting that she is behind some conspiracy, just that something doesn’t seem genuine.

Flame proof underwear are donned so …

Well, TPUSA in and of itself is a performance piece. Charlie's whole "prove me wrong" act he did at college campuses had nothing to do with wanting to be proven wrong, but rather a performance. Hence why he always wanted to talk to the people first who disagreed with him the most because he knew that would get him the most attention for his organization. And in all fairness, it's not just Charlie and his organization, but rather it's everything in politics that's nothing more than a performance. All these political rallies with pyrotechnics and musical performances and celebrity appearances. It's literal performance art and we eat it all up.
 
At the risk of ridicule and white knight attacks…

I just get the heebie jeebies when I hear Ms. Kirk speak. When she says “Charlie baby” and especially when she was speaking at the memorial and publicly forgave the shooter …. I just get the impression of some performance and I can’t shake it.

I have talked to my sister and wife and they see it as well. I don’t want it to be a product of an overly jaded perspective so I have sat on it a while to see how I feel with some more time. It isn’t subsiding.

I am certainly not asserting that she is behind some conspiracy, just that something doesn’t seem genuine.

Flame proof underwear are donned so …

My wife and I agree with you, she actually said it first when Erika spoke the first time. I saw it but was factoring in the grief part. Now after her second speech, her attitude and phrasing doesn't seem right to me. Something is off.
Personally I do not see TPUSA succeeding long term.
 
Do you have a mouse in your pocket?

Am I lying that we eat it all up? I normally don't like speaking for others, but some folks are afraid to say the quiet part out loud out of fear of ridicule or ostracization. As time goes on more and more people will bury those fears and speak more openly for themselves.
 
My wife and I agree with you, she actually said it first when Erika spoke the first time. I saw it but was factoring in the grief part. Now after her second speech, her attitude and phrasing doesn't seem right to me. Something is off.
Personally I do not see TPUSA succeeding long term.

SIMPS love her. They all seem to *need* to be led by a female.

I cannot think of less of a display of traditional family values than a mother diverting her attention away from two very young children at this time.

I will not support TPUSA




IMG_7450.jpeg