Search results

OK so I have a new marlin 917 vrx I am setting up. I've done the Boyd's tacticool stock conversion. My optic is the Burris Mtac 4.5-14x42. I installed the DIP 25 MOA rail and Burris xtr lows. So here is my issue. I need another 1/2-3/4" for eye relief in the scope to be comfy on the gun...

does anyone have the skinny on the vortex tactical rings? Vortex Tactical - Tactical 30mm Ring Low trying to figure out who they are similiar too. at first i thought they were the same as the burris xtr's, but the measurements seem to be different. are they the same as the weaver...

narrowed it down to these two. cant decide between them. i like everything about the vortex, but i want to be able to dial like the mueller. Mueller 4.5-14×40AO Tactical or the Crossfire II 4-12x40 AO with BDC

picked up a heavy barrel .17hmr. going to put it in a boyds tacticool and use it for varmint/bench shooting. what do you all think for an optic choice?

I was recently given a Marlin 917VRX purchased from Bi-Mart. It has the black synthetic stock with the built in trigger guard (one piece). I want to purchase this: Boyds: TACT MARLIN® 917 CLIP FEED BBC LAM STK W/BLK TEXT F TactiCool What do I need to get to make this conversion work as...

did a search. the site went into system overload with too many results. cannot figure out how to word it. so i am just going to ask. Same old story I am sure. I have a hunting rifle, sportster barrel, ADL, chambered in .270 win. I do not have the means to purchase a new rig right now, so...

ok, first i will start with the details of the rifle. i have an AR15 built off of mega recievers. it has a 4 lb timney trigger, nsr ff rail, and the barrel is a daniel defense 16" s2w in 5.56 (suppose to hold 1 moa, we shall see). i am building a spr/do it all rifle. my optic of choice is...

i have an ar15 spr with a 16" barrel in .223/5.56 that i am building. i am driving myself crazy deciding on an optic zoom range for this rifle. i have decided for sure i want the vortex pst ffp. and i have narrowed it down to the 2.5-10x32 or the 4-16x50 ffp models. i can get the 4-16 now...

Alright. I am pretty confused and not sure what to do. I am building an SPR. I keep reading that a 1-4 is the best suited for an AR. I am really drawn to the vortex scopes. However, I am really drawn to the new 2.5-10 x 32 FFP viper pst. But I am worried that I will hate this scope on...

i am confused trying to figure this out. does vortex make a scope that is FFP mil/mil in the 2/3ish to 10/15ish range that is NON illuminated? i dont need illumination and do not want to spend the extra for that feature, but would like FFP help?

which and why? i cannot decide. this optic will live its life on two different guns. my SPR AR15 (16", 5.56) and my Rem 700 .270. it will do everything from target shooting all the way up to elk hunting and all varmints inbetween.

what is the prefered brand? will mount on AR.

i currently own a brand new basic 597. have not shot it that much. maybe 20 rounds. http://www.remington.com/products/firearms/rimfire/model-597/model-597.aspx i find myself wanting to build a .22 trainer. would like heavy barrel, boyds tacticool, bipod, etc. now, here is the...

new to the AR scene. Need an optic for it. I already have a red dot to try. What the gun will be used for is 50-400 yard target and varmint hunting. Coyotes, prarie dogs, etc. budget is $500 and down. I dont be any means needs a scope that cost as much as my rifle. This is not something...

ok, i have been reading and searching and reading on this forum trying to gain as much knowledge as i can to make a decision on a bolt rifle. i apologize up front as i am still a newb to precision shooting and am trying to gain knowledge from you great group of men and ladies here. so here is...

new to the forum here and am trying to do some research for the last couple days. i am having some trouble with the search function though. trying to search for topics relating to various factory rem 700's in .308 and their differences (i know, very noob thing to do), but i am getting very...