Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Watch Out for Scammers!
We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!
Good day so I had a look at a zeiss s3 4-25 and Leupold mark 5hd in a shop and too me the Leupold looked a lot better couldn’t really focus the zeiss at further distances do you guys think it was a defected scope or does the Leupold just have better glass.
Some people say the Athlon Cronus btr has better glass than a razor and the maven has better glass than the Athlon I would like to hear from Someone who has looked at each of these scopes.
You sort of had me make up my mind in the beginning but towards the end you have me deciding again. The lr you have was it one of the first scopes to hit the market ? And can anyone else comment about the eyebox and glass of the lr
O You explained it perfectly when you say the lr has better resolution does that mean the ability to refine detail ? I am going to be putting the scope on a very light setup for hunting mainly and I’m going to have a heavy barrel for a phew comps that I’ll attend so I might be leaning more...
O oo ok I understand I’m selling a pm2 5-25 and was just wandering if I should get a used zp5 mr4 for or just pick up a new lr instead for less. Somone said that the zp5 has a better eye box, less ca and a nicer ret so I am just wandering if that is all true because it could just be their opinion
Can anyone who has one perhaps take through the scope pics at the range just so some of us can get a better idea of the reticle and Ca if anyone has free time at the range.