Well, regrettably, either my hand loading sucks or my shooting does. Actually, probably both...
Absolutely impossible to determine any significant difference in performance between the two seating depths. If anything, the 2.80 shot better/tighter, but that might have just been me having my shit slightly more together for rounds 15-25.
None of the 130 or 140 hand loads (ran all 40 today) grouped as well as factory Hornady AG 140 BTHP or S&B 140 FMJ (which my range was selling for $22 a box...I might just go back and buy the rest for short range practice).
I accidentally dumped my LabRadar data for the 130 @ 2.80. It was a bit faster than the 2.85 as one would expect. No pressure on any of the brass today. KRG SOTIC w/ 22" barrel. Here's the 130:
CHG WT | AVG MV | MVs | | | | |
42.3 | 2820 | 2807 | 2828 | 2801 | 2811 | 2804 |
| | 2820 | 2839 | 2813 | 2853 | 2819 |
SD: | 16.5 | AVG MV (-9) | 2816 | SD (-9) | 12.2 | |
ES: | 52 | | | ES (-9) | 38 | |
I only did the extra calcs minus shot 9 because it was 2x SD above the average.
If anyone's curious, that tracks with 42.7 grains in QuickLoad, @61346 psi. Of course, QL is only so-so in terms of reliability here because it's waaaay off on 6.5 CM case volume. I usually tweak until I get the velocity right and then look at the pressure curve if working backwards from real world data.