Re: 1903 Springfield vs 1917 Enfield.iu
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Is there a major difference in accuracy, or reliability?</div></div>
Yes and no. Both are extremely reliabile. I have both, when it comes to shooting, I can shoot the 1903a3 much better, its faster and smoother in the rapid fire stages of the GSM matches.
Fact is I've never found a smoother working bolt action rifle then my SC 'a3.
Now I agree that in reality its the shooter. In slow fire my Eddystone M1917 is about as accurate as my 'a3, but over all, the a3 is more accurate.
Both are shot in CMP GSM matches. GSM stands for Grand, Springfield and Military (other vintage military rifles). Notice the Springfield has its own catagory. The M1917 is put into a class with "all other" vintaged military rifles.
Go to the scores posted in the above links, you'll notice the Springfield scores are higher then the others, including the Garand.
Don't get me wrong, I have no problem with my M11917, wouldn't trade it for anything, but its not as smooth as my M1903a3. From the bench there isn't much difference, but for over all shooting, as in CMP-GSM games, the M1903a3 has the edge when you're talking about slow fire, offhand (standing) and rapid fire. A huge advantage is the windage adjustments on the 1903a3s.
Best senario would be to get both.
Many people don't understand the sights on the M1917. When the sight leaf is folded down, its sighted in for a battle sight zero of 400 yards. To shoot other yardage, such as 100, 200 etc, you use the leaf sight in the up right position.
With quick shots with the Model 1917, be careful to use the front sight, and not one of the ears, that will get you sooner or later. Teaches you to pay attention.