Re: 1911 Reliability?
I have two 1911's, one is a NH Talon that is "broken in" and the other is a Dan Wesson CCO that is nearly new. Two weeks ago at the range both weapons ran perfectly with 230 WWB, 230 Federal Premium HST +P, as well as 185gr. Winchester Silvertips. The Dan Wesson had just been cleaned and lubed by me while the NH was on it's third range trip without a cleaning, just a little lube on the rails as it is my daily carry gun. Are they as reliable as a Glock? Maybe not but I don't throw my sidearm in the mud.
I will say that I think that whole pistol reliabilty thing is a little out of hand these day, or maybe I'm just lucky(doubtful). I've been the owner of a Bersa .380 ACP (GASP) for 18 years, a Taurus PT101 .40(ULTRA GASP) for 16 years, a HK USP Compact .40(about two years before I sold her), a Beretta Custom Carry 9mm for ten years, the NH Talon for 7 years, a Browning Buckmark .22 for 4 years, and the new Dan Wesson for two months. I've NEVER had any of the following pistols jam, Not even the Bersa or Taurus.
I really think if you keep them clean and don't feed them shit ammo most, if not all, will be fine. I will add that I've never been to a two/three day pistol course where you go through 1500 rounds. But think about it, is that really anywhere close to the abuse that a normal pistol will endure.....Unless you are a sniper dropped behind enemy lines in a Rambo movie, NO!
If you are looking for a SHTF pistol to last forever, get a glock, otherwise I think a 1911 that is properly cared for will fullfill almost anyone's needs in a sidearm, just my two cents.
Edit to add: If you are into competitive shooting and do shoot thousands upon thousands from your pistol weekly, I think that you are bound to have parts wear out to the point that they need replaced. Does one handgun design lend itself to lasting longer than another? Maybe, but I'll say this.......probably the most durable/reliable gun that I've ever owned(the HK) I couldn't hit shit with. So all that durabilty was useless to me.