All,
I've just recently had a chance to take out a rifle that was recently built for me. One thing that I've noticed is that it won't eject lapua brass. I've tried virgin and FL size lapua and it won't eject the cases consistently, loaded or unloaded(<5% ejection). The cases are just dumped on the follower. It's also a bit tougher (marginal) to chamber the lapua brass over remington brass. It will eject remington brass (100%). All brass is at the minimum trim to length tolerances. The lapua neck is at .292 on unfired brass, .294 on loaded cases and ~.295 on fired cases.
The second thing that was noted is that ejector marks are evident at 41.5gr H4350, which is the suggested starting load from the Hogdon website for the 142's. I realize that lapua is thicker, and I could have a hot lot of powder, but that doesn't explain the ejection issue. These were loaded up to test out the rifle and perform a break in.
Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
260 tactical match reamer, .298Nk with 0.088FB
I've just recently had a chance to take out a rifle that was recently built for me. One thing that I've noticed is that it won't eject lapua brass. I've tried virgin and FL size lapua and it won't eject the cases consistently, loaded or unloaded(<5% ejection). The cases are just dumped on the follower. It's also a bit tougher (marginal) to chamber the lapua brass over remington brass. It will eject remington brass (100%). All brass is at the minimum trim to length tolerances. The lapua neck is at .292 on unfired brass, .294 on loaded cases and ~.295 on fired cases.
The second thing that was noted is that ejector marks are evident at 41.5gr H4350, which is the suggested starting load from the Hogdon website for the 142's. I realize that lapua is thicker, and I could have a hot lot of powder, but that doesn't explain the ejection issue. These were loaded up to test out the rifle and perform a break in.
Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
260 tactical match reamer, .298Nk with 0.088FB