On the one I currently have, I got an AAC upper with the KAC URX2 handguard (it was built exactly as I wanted it at the time, save for the fact it had mid instead of rifle length handguards). With the thin barrel, it is quite light. The SDN-6 suppressor works well, but mount has play. It currently has a Leupold Mk.4 2.5-8x, but I may put a Browe optic on it later. Titanium, batt. illuminated reticle, ex-Trijicon guy's startup bussiness, reticle similar to the Leupold .300BLK reticle and not the useless ACOG BLK reticle. Check it out: nice, compact titanium ACOG-esque 4x combat optic, dual illum. BDC for the BLK with interesting features. NV settings so it works with clip ons. Nice caps and the ARD threads in. Uses a CR123 or 3v DC battery jack.
But the little .300BLK impressed me, it did more than I expected it to. It exceeded my expectations by far. I figured it would be primarily limited to this 200m or so range I normally shoot at, but found it shot very easily at those distances, with either supers or subs, given appropriate elevation changes on the scope --which I found I still had plenty left to go. I suspect subs peter out between 250-350ish, but the supers could go quite a bit further. So I'd like to try one built a little better, but still light. In fact, lighter.
For another I'm building, I'm thinking of going with a quality 14.7" stainless, deep and wide fluting on a heavy or medium contour, twist to be determined, but barrel should weigh in at around 1 pound and with a blind pinned Wilson GI type flash hider/mount, PRI carbon fiber handgaurds (or possibly a carbine length KAC URX3) and a 17 oz. Wilson Combat titanium suppressor. I like the VLTOR uppers for strength, but for lightweight, I'm gonna stick with a good, quality forged upper and lower. Maybe a Mega, they are local (and I have one laying around). CTR stock. I like JP Ent. Full Mass BCG best of any other, period, but may try their low mass setup in this one. That about does it, the rest is sort of user specific, like triggers (some Geissele I'm sure) and grips and bipods and other accessories.
I'm building a light 6.5Grendel to these specs too, but with the VLTOR upper and Satern barrel. It'll use the same suppressor and have a USO 1-6x DFP scope/dot. Should have it done... In about 2 years.
I'll probably go with the Browe on this .300 too unless someone else comes up with another one I like better, or if I don't like the first one I get. Right now there are two reticles it seems: the ACOG and Browe/Leupold (which is much better IMO). There is the EOTech one, but also doesn't take full advantage of this cartridge like the ACOG, and you literally have to determine what range that second dot is for by trial and error with subs once you get a super zero. With the Browe (or Leupold) you can zero one side or the other and it works with most light supers and 220 subs.
Now if you can get an SBR, well, then things open up quite a bit. That is what I wanted, but we can't have that here, hence the blind pinned mount to save the extra inch or so (which doesn't interfere with barrel removal, only the gas block). Good looking SBR .300bbls. look, to me, to be the heavy Noveske barrels by far. AAC makes one as well, a light 8.5"? and it isn't too bad either (the 16" light barrel is pretty accurate so far) but it uses their SDN-6 mount, unless you take that off. The flash suppressor mount itself works very well too. Personally, I'd use a different suppressor, a lighter one that either threads on or has a stable QD mount that locks up tight. Probably that EOTech you mention, maybe another, maybe an Aimpoint Micro (T1?). .300Blackout is really good for a PDW type weapon, it doesn't lose too much velocity in the short barrels compared to 5.56, but functions just like the familiar M4. Wish we could have SBR's, there are only a couple I want and this is one of them. Only thing better would be a side folding stock...